![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Oct 2004 15:30:43 GMT, Jim Vincent wrote:
snip Then again, with a T-tail, the elevator is no longer essentially in rotation, but also in translation, so there that to consider too... Jim Vincent N483SZ illspam Jim, Why does the elevator have more translation on a T-Tail than on a conventional one please ? (I presume you are referring to translation in a direction normal to the tailplane surface) Bemused John G. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 'T' configuration gets the tail out of the way
of crops when field landing and consequently helps to be prevent it from being ripped off! I should imagine that this would be a rather expensive mistake?! It also provides an end plate for fin and so potentially reduces drag, although I'm not sure by how much. At 11:06 26 October 2004, Stefan wrote: Pro T-tail: It's in the clean air. Contra T-tail: Huge torque forces. The torque forces are more easily mastered when the planes are small. There are biz jets and turboprops with T-tails. On the other hand, all serious acro planes, gliders included, have 'conventional' tails. Stefan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:46:18 +0200, Marian Aldenhövel
wrote: I have noticed that most if not all modern gliders are built with a T-Tail (not sure about the term, I am talking about the elevator being located at the top of the tailfin). While most power-aircraft I know right up to the airliners have it at the bottom. What are the aerodynamic or constructive reasons for that? A T-Tail has significantly less interference drag (Interferenzwiderstand) than a conventional one. Since its weight is located on top of the vertical stabilizer (Seitenflosse), fuselage structure needs to be stronger, but the additional weight is acceptable for a glider that needs to have as little drag as possible. Bye Andreas |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What about the pilatus B4 then?
Rgds, Derrick Steed |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Derrick Steed" wrote in message ... What about the pilatus B4 then? Rgds, Derrick Steed Whats your point the B4 is a T Tail, I fly one Peter. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Seddon" wrote in message ... "Derrick Steed" wrote in message ... What about the pilatus B4 then? Rgds, Derrick Steed Whats your point the B4 is a T Tail, I fly one Peter. Oh you mean modern, well it is of sorts. Peter. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Additionally the T-Tail acts like a large Winglet on the end of the
vertical stab and improves the effectiveness of the vertical Stab and Rudder. Also it only has 2 intersections as opposed to 4 on a conventional tail. Plus it is easier to mount a one piece removable stab on top rather than in the middle of the vertical stab. Brian Marian Aldenhövel wrote in message ... Hi, I have noticed that most if not all modern gliders are built with a T-Tail (not sure about the term, I am talking about the elevator being located at the top of the tailfin). While most power-aircraft I know right up to the airliners have it at the bottom. What are the aerodynamic or constructive reasons for that? Ciao, MM |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Or even the Salto
At 12:48 26 October 2004, Derrick Steed wrote: What about the pilatus B4 then? Rgds, Derrick Steed |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What about the pilatus B4 then?
It has a T-tail too;-) Seriously, every design is a trade off between structural weight and performance issues such as wetted area and configuration. The B-4 is an aerobatic glider with very good glider performance, about 35:1. It has a shorter distance from wing to tail compared to most gliders and a larger cross section. That allows the structure to handle the torsional forced induced by the T-tail. In fact there are two models, one for limited aerobatics, the other for full. The main difference is a stiffening plate at the tail. Jim Vincent N483SZ illspam |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Vincent" wrote in message ... What about the pilatus B4 then? It has a T-tail too;-) Seriously, every design is a trade off between structural weight and performance issues such as wetted area and configuration. The B-4 is an aerobatic glider with very good glider performance, about 35:1. It has a shorter distance from wing to tail compared to most gliders and a larger cross section. That allows the structure to handle the torsional forced induced by the T-tail. In fact there are two models, one for limited aerobatics, the other for full. The main difference is a stiffening plate at the tail. Jim Vincent N483SZ illspam There are actually 3 variants 4 if you count the fixed U/C one they are B4 PC11 B4 PC11A B4 PC11AF Peter. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tail Skid Help / Advice | Ray Lovinggood | Soaring | 3 | January 2nd 04 08:16 PM |
AH64 tail rotor | CivetOne | Rotorcraft | 3 | October 23rd 03 07:18 PM |
Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! | Bruce E. Butts | Owning | 1 | July 26th 03 11:34 AM |
Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! | Bruce E. Butts | Piloting | 1 | July 26th 03 11:34 AM |
The prone postion for tail gunners versus turrets. | The Enlightenment | Military Aviation | 8 | July 22nd 03 11:01 PM |