![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Oscar wrote: To re-phrase: are FS2004, SFSPC, etc just games to be enjoyed or are they valid teaching tools? Is there any place for simulators in the learning process? Does anybody here use sims regularly (say over the winter month) as a substitute for real gliding? One more pictu http://bauerj.fw.hu/SOTS/eddigiek_12_01.jpg It was done from all igc files what we did in sots. We know Minden quite well from sots. It was funny to see the face of a pilot flown there, when after a fairly long discussion about the Minden mountains, it turned out that I wasn't there at all. ![]() Nowadays we fly on Sion scenery. That is also seems to be realistic. /Jancsika |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
YES, flight sims DO have LIMITED value in training for real-life soaring but
most gloss over details that every student encounters and must know. Each program has its good points and shortcomings, and unfortunately the hardest thing to simulate is low-speed handling; just what real-life students need most practice with. Your interest is in learning for real-life, so I'll list my suggestions in order of flight model accuracy, from easiest to most realistic. http://www.sfspc.de/index_e.htm SFSpc is a fun game but not the best teacher for real life. It is engaging but too easy to use. Tow and winch practice don't show realistic airspeed and slack-line issues. Thermals are unrealistically cylindrical and smooth. Thermals realistically start/stop with tops/bottoms instead of just shutting off. All SFSpc thermals drift with the wind, where IRL some do ("bubble" types, once well above ground level) and some don't ("fountain" types continuously flow from a trigger point on the ground and SLANT as they rise; performing "turns about a point" on a breezy day is a skill this program won't bring up). Pitch and speed control is too easy. Yaw control is WAY too simple and needs a LOT of improvement; once established in a turn it does not require inside rudder and outside aileron as a real aircraft does. MS Flight Simulator is fine for flight well above stall speed and I love it for keeping instrument skills up in the deep winter, but I can't recommend it for teaching flight close to stall speed (e.g. thermalling). Mind you, I use FS 2004 a LOT because I like the graphics; everyone has a price. http://www.x-plane.com/ X-plane is my favorite for rotary-wing practice and it does have a respectable flight model. I miss the fun of competing sailplanes on a cross-country task so I rarely spend more than 15 minutes soaring with it. The graphics are about on par with SFSpc. Aero-tow and winch launch are moderately accurate. http://www.sailorsofthesky.com/ SOTS has possibly the best graphics, and very accurate handling. Spin recovery may be MORE difficult than IRL, but that teaches you NOT to spin without planning (and always plan for the possibility). SOTS thermals do not drift with the wind. Like SFSpc they are cylindrical and too smooth. I don't recall having to work upwind to avoid being pushed out of a thermal, but that's because I sometimes use the delightful autopilot to thermal for me. Slack-line problems on tow are not part of this program. I'm thrilled to hear a new release is planned, as it is my current favorite soaring simulator. http://www.silentwings.no/ Silent Wings (still in beta) is my top pick for realistic aero-tow handling, and the graphics are more than satisfactory. The aero-tow is EXCELLENT because it is the only program that simulates slack-line problems. There is no winch option. The beta has no wake turbulence from the tow plane so that reminder is missing if you drift high/low on tow or when "boxing the wake". The beta can't be stalled or spun, but the crossed controls needed during low-speed circling feels JUST right. Inertia feels right too; press and release the rudder and the nose oscilations damp slowly just as they should. This makes three-axis control while thermalling in ragged lift feel VERY real. This is (currently) the only program to model thermals as less than mathmatically perfect cylinders from bottom to top. Thermals appear to drift with the wind and clouds swell and fade noticably over time. If the first released version of Silent Wings adds stall/spin then it may become my top pick. The developers' hearts seem to be in the right place. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gliding, Vintage Book 1932 Motorless Flight FA | Sarah Mc. | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | November 5th 04 11:40 PM |
Gliding Vintage Book 1932 Motorless Flight FA | Sarah Mc. | General Aviation | 0 | November 5th 04 01:09 AM |
Gliding Vintage Book 1932 Motorless Flight FA | Sarah Mc. | Soaring | 0 | November 5th 04 01:07 AM |
Zimbabwe gliding facilities ? | not@top-post | Soaring | 6 | September 28th 04 05:22 AM |
vPos - Realtime presentation of gliding | Jan Olav Endrerud | Soaring | 2 | June 16th 04 04:53 PM |