![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steve.T" wrote in message
ups.com... Do yourself a favor and finish your Private in the plane you soloed in. Remember, your solo sign-off is a type rating! That means you will have to be signed off for solo for each type of aircraft you will fly. C150 and C152 require a sign-off for each. Single Engine Land below 12,500 lbs MaxGW do not require "type ratings". Only insurance companies require " insurance signoffs" to fly different models of aircraft... Not the FARs... (at least in US) .. most sign offs for small fixed gear trainers can be completed within one hour by a competent pilot and CFI. Transition checkouts to "complex" or "high performance" SEL aircraft will require additional training. BT |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Either way (hi or low wing) be sure you get experience with aft CG.
The 172 elevator forces really go down with aft CG. Actually 172s handle better with rearward CG, and the worst handling is full fuel and two in front only. I suspect Cherokees would be the same way. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Metavalent" wrote in message .verio.net... What are your aircraft recommendations for a new student? My own perspective: C-152 -- money saver(if your weigh less than 160lbs); PA28-161 or 181 -- least hours to get your Private Pilot Certificate; C-172SP -- pricey, but new and nicely equipped; SR22 -- more expensive, but you get cutting edge technology and performance. I trained in Warriors and switched to a 172N after getting my license. I found the Warrior easier overall, particularly in crosswinds. The Warrior is less sensitive in pitch and has less adverse yaw, so it doesn't force you to learn to use the rudder as much. However, both are fairly tame and the performance envelope is similar enough that switching wont be too challenging. If you switch, you may spend 5 or more hours re-developing your feel for the plane. Figure that as a cost versus sticking with the 172SP. Personally, if I ran the world, I would strip every piece of avionics out of primary trainers except for a transponder and com radio. Airspeed, altimeter, and tachometer are the only instruments you need to be learning about at this stage. -cwk. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BTIZ wrote:
"Steve.T" wrote in message Do yourself a favor and finish your Private in the plane you soloed in. Remember, your solo sign-off is a type rating! That means you will have to be signed off for solo for each type of aircraft you will fly. C150 and C152 require a sign-off for each. Single Engine Land below 12,500 lbs MaxGW do not require "type ratings". Only insurance companies require " insurance signoffs" to fly different models of aircraft... Not the FARs... (at least in US) .. most sign offs for small fixed gear trainers can be completed within one hour by a competent pilot and CFI. Transition checkouts to "complex" or "high performance" SEL aircraft will require additional training. I think what Steve was referring to is student pilot limitations. I solo'd in a C172 and did both my x-countries in the C172. I bought the PA28 before I completed training. That meant the CFI had to approve me for solo in the PA28. A couple hours more training then he signed me off. In the back of my logbook there's a section on Endorsements. The first solo endorsement reads "...is competent to make safe solo flights in a Cessna 172 only with prior knowledge and consent..." The second endorsement reads "...is competent to make safe solo flights in a PA28A and C172 in winds less than 15 kts..." The second one was when I was allowed to go other places, too. Yes, fuel management is different. On the other hand, if electricity fails, the manual flaps still work just fine. As I said, for most differences, it's really just a religious (or political) issue. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok... that makes more sense... but it is not a "type rating"....
We do the same here with our students.. most make their first solo in the SGS 2-33A, two seats.. then we cut them loose solo in the SGS 1-26D, single seat.. cockpit check and a sign off.. standard wording about an instructor on the field with knowledge of the students intent BT "Blanche Cohen" wrote in message ... BTIZ wrote: "Steve.T" wrote in message Do yourself a favor and finish your Private in the plane you soloed in. Remember, your solo sign-off is a type rating! That means you will have to be signed off for solo for each type of aircraft you will fly. C150 and C152 require a sign-off for each. Single Engine Land below 12,500 lbs MaxGW do not require "type ratings". Only insurance companies require " insurance signoffs" to fly different models of aircraft... Not the FARs... (at least in US) .. most sign offs for small fixed gear trainers can be completed within one hour by a competent pilot and CFI. Transition checkouts to "complex" or "high performance" SEL aircraft will require additional training. I think what Steve was referring to is student pilot limitations. I solo'd in a C172 and did both my x-countries in the C172. I bought the PA28 before I completed training. That meant the CFI had to approve me for solo in the PA28. A couple hours more training then he signed me off. In the back of my logbook there's a section on Endorsements. The first solo endorsement reads "...is competent to make safe solo flights in a Cessna 172 only with prior knowledge and consent..." The second endorsement reads "...is competent to make safe solo flights in a PA28A and C172 in winds less than 15 kts..." The second one was when I was allowed to go other places, too. Yes, fuel management is different. On the other hand, if electricity fails, the manual flaps still work just fine. As I said, for most differences, it's really just a religious (or political) issue. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
well.. at least leave them a wet compass for the cross country work.. LOL
of course they will really learn compass lead/lag problems (BTW, I think it is one of the required instruments..) BT "Colin W Kingsbury" wrote in message nk.net... "Metavalent" wrote in message .verio.net... What are your aircraft recommendations for a new student? My own perspective: C-152 -- money saver(if your weigh less than 160lbs); PA28-161 or 181 -- least hours to get your Private Pilot Certificate; C-172SP -- pricey, but new and nicely equipped; SR22 -- more expensive, but you get cutting edge technology and performance. I trained in Warriors and switched to a 172N after getting my license. I found the Warrior easier overall, particularly in crosswinds. The Warrior is less sensitive in pitch and has less adverse yaw, so it doesn't force you to learn to use the rudder as much. However, both are fairly tame and the performance envelope is similar enough that switching wont be too challenging. If you switch, you may spend 5 or more hours re-developing your feel for the plane. Figure that as a cost versus sticking with the 172SP. Personally, if I ran the world, I would strip every piece of avionics out of primary trainers except for a transponder and com radio. Airspeed, altimeter, and tachometer are the only instruments you need to be learning about at this stage. -cwk. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow! Awesome responses. Thanks so much. I do have to say that my CFI
has done a great job in making this the case. Even with the fancy electronics at hand, he smacked me down if I even THOUGHT about going for the flashy gadgets. He's very much of the school described below and I'm grateful for it! well.. at least leave them a wet compass for the cross country work.. LOL of course they will really learn compass lead/lag problems (BTW, I think it is one of the required instruments..) BT Personally, if I ran the world, I would strip every piece of avionics out of primary trainers except for a transponder and com radio. Airspeed, altimeter, and tachometer are the only instruments you need to be learning about at this stage. -cwk. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Metavalent" wrote Are you posting in plain text? Check your settings. It is the norm to use plain text instead of html on the newsgroups. Thanks -- Jim in NC |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, if you look at requirements for a student pilot, they must be
signed off for each type of aircraft they will fly solo. Kind of a Type Rating if you think about it. And while a student, I think a CFI can't sign you off until you can prove you can do slow flight, stall recovery and controlled landings in that particular type of plane. When I first soloed, I did it in a C152. Because we had done training in the C150 at that point, all I had to do for my instructor was make two landings w/o him having to say or do anything - he then signed me off for the C150. After my PP, I was checked out in a C172 w/in 2 hours total time. All I had to do was prove that I could land the plane, and do slow flight. All the insurance company wanted was a CFI to say I could handle the plane. Later, Steve.T PP ASEL/Instrument |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Using Thunderbird and HTML always turned off! I hate html in email, much
less usenet! Anathema! However, looks like if I hit reply to a message composed in HTML, thunderbird assumes the recipient prefers that? Will keep an eye on it, for sure. Morgans wrote: "Metavalent" wrote Are you posting in plain text? Check your settings. It is the norm to use plain text instead of html on the newsgroups. Thanks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
WINGS: When do the clocks start ticking? | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 6 | February 3rd 04 03:01 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |