![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mark Smith wrote: wrote: Mark Smith wrote: ... Hand proping is also done but as a last resort when the battery is dead. They do start easily when hand propped, but it takes a healthy pull on a blade, then staying out of the way. Some pushers with tails make getting away from the prop a physical excercise too. Thanks, and thnaks to the rest who responded as well. Supposedly with the adoption of the Light Sport Aircraft regs the FAA will soon begin stricter enforcement of the FAR 103 weight limits. where are they going to get the hundreds of new inspectors to do this effort, 'Fat' ultralights will have to get an airworthiness certificate as Experimental Light Sport Aircraft, or be converted to lawn ornaments. actually, homebuilt is still available for us, no lawn ornaments. that statement was made by an FnAA employee who got canned from the sprot pile it program, she is no longer around, I heard it from an EAA guy who recently gave us a very informative talk on the new LSA regs. He said that 'lawn ornament' was becoming popular jargon at the FAA. Don't non-FAR 103 compliant homebuilts require an airworthiness certificate? (That is what I wrote.) Won't homebuilts now be Experimental Light Sport Aircraft?, Is that the part I got wrong? What if the 'homebuilt' was a factory built 'Fat' ultralight? I heard it from an EAA guy who recently gave us a very informative talk on the new LSA regs. So I was thinking about how to get as large an engine as possible, like maybe a Zenoah G-50 on something like a Sadler Vampire while keeping it under 254 lbs. A 'sneaky' way to get a few more lbs might be to install the lightest BRS possible and then take the maximum weight allowance for a BRS. ... getting the smallest one may be false safety as it may be too small for the gross, depending on the pile it weight E.g. lightest possible should be read lightest that is adequate for gross weight. Was your spell checker that substituted 'pile it' for a typoed 'pilot'? Actually a propos considering the context.... -- FF |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Mark Smith wrote: wrote: Mark Smith wrote: ... Hand proping is also done but as a last resort when the battery is dead. They do start easily when hand propped, but it takes a healthy pull on a blade, then staying out of the way. Some pushers with tails make getting away from the prop a physical excercise too. Thanks, and thnaks to the rest who responded as well. Supposedly with the adoption of the Light Sport Aircraft regs the FAA will soon begin stricter enforcement of the FAR 103 weight limits. where are they going to get the hundreds of new inspectors to do this effort, 'Fat' ultralights will have to get an airworthiness certificate as Experimental Light Sport Aircraft, or be converted to lawn ornaments. actually, homebuilt is still available for us, no lawn ornaments. that statement was made by an FnAA employee who got canned from the sprot pile it program, she is no longer around, I heard it from an EAA guy who recently gave us a very informative talk on the new LSA regs. He said that 'lawn ornament' was becoming popular jargon at the FAA. Don't non-FAR 103 compliant homebuilts require an airworthiness certificate? (That is what I wrote.) Won't homebuilts now be Experimental Light Sport Aircraft?, Is that the part I got wrong? What if the 'homebuilt' was a factory built 'Fat' ultralight? I heard it from an EAA guy who recently gave us a very informative talk on the new LSA regs. most don't know much about the regs as much of the so called regs haven't been written/approved, and are being changed as special interest groups complain, this whole rule was written by those who don't fly much about planes they don't fly at all,,,,,,, So I was thinking about how to get as large an engine as possible, like maybe a Zenoah G-50 on something like a Sadler Vampire while keeping it under 254 lbs. A 'sneaky' way to get a few more lbs might be to install the lightest BRS possible and then take the maximum weight allowance for a BRS. ... getting the smallest one may be false safety as it may be too small for the gross, depending on the pile it weight E.g. lightest possible should be read lightest that is adequate for gross weight. Was your spell checker that substituted 'pile it' for a typoed 'pilot'? Actually a propos considering the context.... -- FF typin in the dark with two fingers makes appropriate typos come and go, if i like one, it stays, experimental homebuilt is separate from sprot pile it, the full typo just for you any ultralight may be disassembled, rebuilt, and N numbered as a homebuilt, that is what should have happened to stay legal for the past twenty years or more, with sprot, several new classifications are available, but all require special inspectors, many hours of schooling to inspect your own plane, many many more to actually work on it none of this required with ex homebuilt, -- Mark Smith Tri-State Kite Sales http://www.trikite.com 1121 N Locust St Mt Vernon, IN 47620 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark Smith" wrote Hand proping is also done but as a last resort when the battery is dead. They do start easily when hand propped, but it takes a healthy pull on a blade, then staying out of the way. Does the fact that the two strokes have a gearbox, make the hand propping harder? My guess is yes. -- Jim in NC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
"Mark Smith" wrote Hand proping is also done but as a last resort when the battery is dead. They do start easily when hand propped, but it takes a healthy pull on a blade, then staying out of the way. Does the fact that the two strokes have a gearbox, make the hand propping harder? My guess is yes. -- Jim in NC actually, since the engines are much smaller than the typical GA tractor motor, and the gearbox gives you a speeup in the process, I feel they are as easy plus or minus a bit either way, if things are right, prime, throttle opening, general condition, first pull starts are more the norm than not, same goes for hand propping -- Mark Smith Tri-State Kite Sales http://www.trikite.com 1121 N Locust St Mt Vernon, IN 47620 |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 02:31 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | September 2nd 04 05:15 AM |
BSFC vs gas mileage, 2 stroke vs 4 stroke | Jay | Home Built | 10 | August 24th 04 02:26 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |