A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

wing levelers



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 27th 05, 09:17 AM
Roger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:10:45 -0500, "Peter Dohm"
wrote:

In an effort not to go too far beyond my own knowledge, I'll avoid detail.

My best recollection, being about twenty years from being current as either
a pilot or a technician, is that "wing leveler" is a very missleading term
applied
to a single axis auto-pilot. Typically, the single axis would be yaw
(heading)


Try a Cherokee. They turn just fine using the ailerons with very
little adverse yawh.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
and would have been accomplished be slaving to either a rate gyro (such as
a turn coordinator or turn and slip) and a potentiometer, or a system of an
air jet and heated resistors, to provide a correction signal with
considerable
integration (a/k/a damping or low pass filtering). Although it would seem
intuitive to have the wing leveler steer the plane with the rudder and have
the dihedral roll the wings, the only systems that I have seen used the
ailerons and depended on the vertical stabilizer to keep the resulting yaw
within reason.

If you are still interested in learning more about how autopilots work, I
would
suggest trying to obtain some of the factory trianing manuals for the
technicians who will work on them. Try Bendix/King, S-Tech, and others.
Some books may also be available at college bookstores on booksellers
like Borders or Barnes & Noble.




"Dick" wrote in message
. com...
Sitting around the hanger and discussing the possibility of somehow using
off-the-shelf electronic/computer components or gadgits for semi-automatic
wing leveling on lightly loaded, short wingspans.

Not being computer guys, the current thought is that something should be

out
there that is available cheaply and modifiable to use a simple wing
leveler.

Having heard someplace that automotive computers, as an example, sense

data
millions of times leads us to believe that sensing the wing tip initial
movement and counteracting very very quickly would be a good thing.

As an example: One fellow pictured a rolling ball bearing inside a tube
somehow activating a magnetic switch which in turn pulses a dc linear

motor
to operate the aileron minutely.

We are not sure how to detect the very earliest initial wing tip movement

or
drive the small trim type motor and would appreciate some thoughts or

site
recommendations to investigate.

Thanks, Dick




  #2  
Old February 26th 05, 06:27 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From the model airplane world here is a product that controls both
pitch and roll.

http://www.futaba-rc.com/radioaccys/futm0999.html

It operates by optically referencing the horizon. So your day VFR
application would be a coincident limitation.

I don't know how current autopilots mechanically couple to the flight
controls but there are very large hobby servos that could probaby be
powerful enough to nudge the controls back and forth in response the
the control unit.

You could either just use their sensor and build your own controller or
attempt to use their controller.

BTW- The vibrating piezo gyros used for RC helecopters have some slow
drift so you can't use them directly but they do have a lot of promise
still for a stabization system. In the hobby application they act more
as dampers than absolute references as the horizon would be for the
earlier mentioned method. So the hobby gyro could counteract bumps but
the steady state error would have to be maintaned by the pilot.

Regards

Dick wrote:
Sitting around the hanger and discussing the possibility of somehow

using
off-the-shelf electronic/computer components or gadgits for

semi-automatic
wing leveling on lightly loaded, short wingspans.

Not being computer guys, the current thought is that something should

be out
there that is available cheaply and modifiable to use a simple wing
leveler.

Having heard someplace that automotive computers, as an example,

sense data
millions of times leads us to believe that sensing the wing tip

initial
movement and counteracting very very quickly would be a good thing.

As an example: One fellow pictured a rolling ball bearing inside a

tube
somehow activating a magnetic switch which in turn pulses a dc linear

motor
to operate the aileron minutely.

We are not sure how to detect the very earliest initial wing tip

movement or
drive the small trim type motor and would appreciate some thoughts

or site
recommendations to investigate.

Thanks, Dick


  #3  
Old February 26th 05, 11:27 PM
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote:

From the model airplane world here is a product that controls both

pitch and roll.

http://www.futaba-rc.com/radioaccys/futm0999.html

It operates by optically referencing the horizon. So your day VFR
application would be a coincident limitation.

I don't know how current autopilots mechanically couple to the flight
controls but there are very large hobby servos that could probaby be
powerful enough to nudge the controls back and forth in response the
the control unit.


The servos you describe would be strong enough in a small aircraft since
autopilots I have worked on don't move the primary control surfaces
directly. They move trim tabs.

You could either just use their sensor and build your own controller or
attempt to use their controller.

BTW- The vibrating piezo gyros used for RC helecopters have some slow
drift so you can't use them directly but they do have a lot of promise
still for a stabization system. In the hobby application they act more
as dampers than absolute references as the horizon would be for the
earlier mentioned method. So the hobby gyro could counteract bumps but
the steady state error would have to be maintaned by the pilot.


There are pizeo gyros out there that are less drifty. If you have the
money go look at Crossbow. Their systems are interesting. Among other
things they make AHRS and INS modules.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #4  
Old February 27th 05, 06:25 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Trim tabs you say- Well that makes a lot of sense then. Some nice big
servos embedded in the wing and horizontal stab could do double duty as
conventional trim and with addition of controller, an automatic
stabilazation system.

  #6  
Old February 28th 05, 09:06 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thats what is done on RC Heli's, the rate gyro directly sums into the
normal command. The only control you have is the gain on the gyro and
I'd guess you'd have to adjust this to particular aircraft and
preference of the pilot.

I assume the gyro(s) would be pretty near the center of motion along
with the pilot, but why is this a requirement? Doesn't any ridged part
of the aircraft experience the same yaw,pitch,roll accelerations? One
possible implimentation could be a gryo co-located with the actuator
(servo) that controls that axis.

I think this would replace manual trim because if you could do the
stability control, you sure as heck could make it move back and forth
in response to a 3 position toggle switch.

If it breaks you fly without trim till you land. I think there is some
rule that the aircraft must be controllable with any trim to it's full
limit.

  #7  
Old March 2nd 05, 07:37 AM
Roger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:12:06 GMT, "Dick" wrote:

Sitting around the hanger and discussing the possibility of somehow using
off-the-shelf electronic/computer components or gadgits for semi-automatic
wing leveling on lightly loaded, short wingspans.


To paraphrase the manual for my auto-pilot. When encountering more
than moderate turbulence, turn off the autopilot. I believe Pete
touched on this as well.

The same is true for altitude excursions.

Mine can do a much better job of holding altitude and attitude than I
when the going gets really rough.

That's when I turn it off and manually hold the attitude (more or
less).

Yes it can be done and I'd think the simplest would be to get a solid
state gyro, or turn coordinator... and build around that.


Not being computer guys, the current thought is that something should be out
there that is available cheaply and modifiable to use a simple wing
leveler.


All it takes is money. The less ingenuity, the more money.


Having heard someplace that automotive computers, as an example, sense data
millions of times leads us to believe that sensing the wing tip initial
movement and counteracting very very quickly would be a good thing.


Counteracting very quickly with a lightly loaded wing could possibly
break something very quickly as well.


As an example: One fellow pictured a rolling ball bearing inside a tube
somehow activating a magnetic switch which in turn pulses a dc linear motor
to operate the aileron minutely.


Rule number one...no... sorry that one is already taken. An airplane
and any thing in it does not know up from down in anything except
straight and level flying. However a gyro tends to stay in the same
position you put it when starting out, so it makes a good reference
platform. (as long as you don't do anything drastic to confuse it such
as causing it to tumble)
I haven't seen any prices on the components for a solid state gyro.


We are not sure how to detect the very earliest initial wing tip movement or
drive the small trim type motor and would appreciate some thoughts or site
recommendations to investigate.


Find an old DG, or TC and experiment from there.
Build in sufficient disconnects so if it goes TU you can put the
greasy side on the bottom again.

You can over-ride a wing leveler or AP, but it always gives me a
strange feeling to be telling the airplane to do one thing when it's
fighting me to do something else and its attempt is readily apparent.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com

Thanks, Dick


  #8  
Old March 2nd 05, 04:30 PM
Pete Schaefer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Roger" wrote in message
...
To paraphrase the manual for my auto-pilot. When encountering more
than moderate turbulence, turn off the autopilot. I believe Pete
touched on this as well.


Driving an auto-pilot too hard can put your servos on the rate limit. On a
rate limit, a servo develops serious amplitude-dependent lag, which can
destabilize your loop closures. THe way arount this problem? Big, huge,
powerful, fast servos. This solution opens up a whole other can of worms.

All it takes is money. The less ingenuity, the more money.


Being intimate with the hazards associated with such a project, I would
never recommend this as a casual development project. In this case, less
ingenuity means great exposure to serious hazards. It all seems so simple in
concept, but the devil.......

Counteracting very quickly with a lightly loaded wing could possibly
break something very quickly as well.


And that's just one of the hazards.

I haven't seen any prices on the components for a solid state gyro.


The ones the R/C guys use, which are, in my opinion, quite rugged and
accurate enough for this kind of an application, pretty innexpensive. I
think I saw one model that sold for under $200. Systron-Donner makes
single-axis chips for (working from memory) under $500. Full 6-dof Motion
Packs go for around $20k. I think Crossbow has a 6-dof package for under
$12k.

Build in sufficient disconnects so if it goes TU you can put the
greasy side on the bottom again.


Yup. On the stick. Fly it with a gun to it's head.




  #9  
Old March 3rd 05, 06:36 AM
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Pete Schaefer wrote:

snip
I think Crossbow has a 6-dof package for under
$12k.


Crossbows prices have dropped over the past 2 years. The AHRS they had
at $10K is now under $8K per UI of 1.

Now if the made and interface to drive synchro instruments....

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #10  
Old March 3rd 05, 09:02 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You can get really nice R/C servos for way under $100. Ball
bearingsand the works. The quarter scale size servos would probably be
about right to fly a control surface.

Piezo gyros are also under $100 for R/C applications.

Regards

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ANG Woman Wing Commander Doesn't See Herself as Pioneer, By Master Sgt. Bob Haskell Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 March 18th 04 08:40 PM
Wing tip stalls mat Redsell Soaring 5 March 13th 04 05:07 PM
Props and Wing Warping... was soaring vs. flaping Wright1902Glider Home Built 0 September 29th 03 03:40 PM
Can someone explain wing loading? Frederick Wilson Home Built 4 September 10th 03 02:33 AM
An Affordable Homebrue 60 in DS machine Grant Soaring 0 August 8th 03 03:52 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.