![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 01:46:46 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote: Man, as an owner, I'd kill the avionics tech that made it "non-swingable" (or whatever). Just think of the billions of hours of billable tech time wasted because they have to take the seats out, etc., in order to get at the backside of things... Oh, wait... Ah. I get it now. ;-) One of my top ten favorites was an old V-tail Bananer that had fixed nuts on the aft (aircraft aft) side of the instrument panel. Which basically meant pulling an instrument required getting to the screw heads. Get the picture? Gotta admit Jay, I get a kick out of youse guys carrying on about having to get behind the panel. To steal/paraphrase a line from a plumber friend of mine-your **** (or your **** jobs) is my bread and butter. All kidding aside, minimal access combined with tight quarters and marginal engineering makes it really tough to root around behind-the-dash without messing things up. Even if you're skilled and very, very careful. TC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
: Wouldn't it be awesome if someone came up with an STC'd Cherokee panel : that had a piano hinge at the bottom, so that we could simply flip the : panel down, and get at the back of the radios, instruments and : switches? I fixed, uh, a landing light wire on an almost new Mooney a couple weeks ago. That huge circuit breaker panel on the right side is a swing out panel, at least on M20R airplanes. It slides out about 6" then swings open so that you can get at the back of the 1,000,000 circuit breakers installed in it. It was pretty nifty. -- Aaron C. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Wouldn't it be awesome if someone came up with an STC'd Cherokee panel that had a piano hinge at the bottom, so that we could simply flip the panel down, and get at the back of the radios, instruments and switches? Is there some reason this hasn't been attempted? As atleast one other has pointed out, the Cherokee panel is structural, and modifications to it must be done with this in mind. I doubt that a flip down panel could be accomplished and the structural nature of the panel be preserved. One note of interest... Cherokee Six/Saratoga class Pipers, that have a baggage compartment in between the cabin and the engine, have removable panels that allow access to the back of the instrument panel. --- Jay -- __!__ Jay and Teresa Masino ___(_)___ http://www2.ari.net/jmasino ! ! ! http://www.oceancityairport.com http://www.oc-adolfos.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay,
There is a simpler solution. My Husky has a panel that screws into the panel. Loosen the screws and pull out the 4 insturments attached. You now have a big hole that alllows pretty good access to everything. Still, its not always easy. But every round instrument comes out without too much trouble. Doubt if there is any retrofit of such a panel on your Cherokee though. BTW a new panel is MAJOR bucks, so any retrofitting wouldn't be cost effective anyway. Whatever you do make CERTAIN the none of the wires are getting tangled with you yoke arm etc. I've seen where travel got restricted on the yoke due to adding some wiring and the tech not taking that into account. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I did a Glastar panel, and seeing that the landing gear
sockets would dig into my back, and the stick would be in the way in any case, I designed the central radio stack to carry hinges on each vertical edge, and the left and right panels were swung at this point. Several screws along the top and bottom edges kept things closed. It took a bit more hose and wire, and attention had to be paid to just where you located the six flight instruments so that the outer ones wouldn't snag the frame, but it worked like a charm and it made finishing the airplane so easy and servicing the systems even easier. The only visible evidence that things were different were the piano hinges, just visible beside the radios. Dan |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The only visible evidence that things were different were the piano
hinges, just visible beside the radios. Dang, Dan, that's EXACTLY what I want. I wonder if the new glass panels in Pipers (with the Avidyne system) and Cessnas (with the Garmin stuff) have some easier way to get at the back-side of things? Since they had to re-design the whole panel for the displays, I sure hope they took this into account. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is the wrong thread to post this to, Jay, but in response to your
Seattle question, let me second the advice of the guy who suggested you stay in downtown Seattle. If you can afford it, the Edgewater, at the north end of Elliott Bay is a beauty. There's lots right there along the waterfront, and the acquarium is a don't-miss-it attraction. And like the fellow said, from Elliott bay, just drive south on the Viaduct, get on West Marginal, and you're at the museum of flight. And if you've got business, send Mary and the kids on a day trip to Victoria on the catamaran ferry. Do not under any circumstances book a hotel anywhere near Seatac airport. Even the nice hotels are soul-less (The Mariott gets credit for trying--nice atrium.), and the stuff in-between is all fast-food, lap-dancing, and mini-indian casinos with pawn shops across the street. (OK, there's also some neighborhood Halal groceries and an upscale Larry's supermarket..) The good brewpubs are in the Ballard neighborhood or between there and the Fremont neighborhood. If you find yourself in Fremont, ask for directions to the Troll bridge. (not a pub). In Ballard, you should visit Archie McPhee. (Which seems to have moved to Market from Stone Way.) Don |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck Mar 5, 8:17 pm show options
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.owning From: "Jay Honeck" - Find messages by this author Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 04:17:12 GMT Local: Sat, Mar 5 2005 8:17 pm Subject: Why not a hinged panel? Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse The only visible evidence that things were different were the piano hinges, just visible beside the radios. Dang, Dan, that's EXACTLY what I want. I wonder if the new glass panels in Pipers (with the Avidyne system) and Cessnas (with the Garmin stuff) have some easier way to get at the back-side of things? Since they had to re-design the whole panel for the displays, I sure hope they took this into account. I bet not. It would cost too much and require the hoses and wiring to be suitably restrained to avoid fouling the control column, yet moveable to allow the panels to open. Works well on stick airplanes. Which, incidentally, are REAL airplanes, especially if they have the little wheel in back (I'm ducking...). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trying to find the Boeing 737-300 Photo Real Panel for FS98(antique;-) | Heiko Brandstaedter | Simulators | 0 | October 7th 04 02:42 PM |
C182 Glass Panel | Scott Schluer | Piloting | 15 | February 27th 04 03:52 PM |
replacing plastic panel overlay w/aluminum | Dave | Owning | 7 | January 10th 04 10:52 PM |
Air Force Academy Review Panel Releases Report | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 19th 03 03:45 AM |
Air Force Museum forms review panel | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 2 | August 29th 03 04:41 PM |