![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Blanche Cohen" wrote in message
... I live in the Rocky Mountain area and Angel Flight here is really necessary. All too many of our pax are nowhere near a major airport or even a train station. True, my perspective is colored by my own local experiences with AF. Here in the northeast, AF is often a matter of convenience (albeit a significant one!) rather than necessity. --Gary |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary wrote:
Here in the northeast, AF is often a matter of convenience (albeit a significant one!) rather than necessity. A 4 year old child loses both kidneys and is on dialysis. He needs a transplant and the doctor who is to perform the transplant is 8 hours away by car. His family hears about Angel Flight and asks for help. Angel Flight Northeast steps in and is able to fly this boy and his mother to the transplant and for every follow-up appointment over the next year (from Rochester, NY, to Boston) to see if the kidney is being rejected. Convenience or necessity? A woman is in the late stages of cancer and is close to death. She wants more than anything else to witness her daughter's wedding, which is located in the middle of Maine, far from any commercial airport. She is unable to make the seven-to-ten hour car ride and cannot fly the airlines due to her lower immune system. She hears about Angel Flight and is able to get a flight from Teterboro to mid-Maine. She witnesses her child's wedding, then dies sometime soon thereafter. Convenience or necessity? Gary, I don't mean to stir the waters here with you, but I do perceive flying for AF a bit differently than my interpretation of how you perceive it. I perceive it as more of a necessity for these people than a convenience. How many of AF's patients would opt to skip an important follow-up appointment if they were faced with a long car ride each month? -- Peter R. (via cumbersome Google Groups) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
True, my perspective is colored by my own local experiences with AF.
Here in the northeast, AF is often a matter of convenience (albeit a significant one!) rather than necessity. On the Gulf Coast, it's a matter of necessity. We're very spread out here. There are major cancer facilities in Houston and San Antonio, and effectively nowhere else in the area. I've flown patients in from all over Texas, Arkansas, Missisippi, and Louisiana. They're looking at 6-12 hour drives to make Houston - and usually flying them in by airline is no faster (or cheaper!) because we're looking at commuter airlines making connections. Many of these people simply can't make the trip - it's just too rough. The only realistic option for them is medical charter - which most insurance (including Medicare) won't pay for. What's more, medical charter is significantly more expensive than my airplane - in part because their pilots and mechanics need to be paid, while I fly and turn wrenches for free, and in part due to regulatory costs (which have NOT given them a better safety record than Angel Flight). I agree that in the NE, Angel Flight is probably more a matter of convenience than anything else, but here in the sparsely populated parts of the country it's a matter of life and death for many. Unfortunately, all too often they die anyway. Most of the patients I fly are very old and very sick. I've flown for Angel Flight a little over four years, and tonight I fly my 50th mission. Most of the people I have flown are dead. Once, I actually took a woman home (to someplace in Louisiana that was hours away from the nearest airport with commuter service) who was told by her doctors that they had tried all they had, and there were no more experimental treatments for which she qualified. All they could give her was something to ease the pain, and the local sawbones could do it just as well. They were sending her home to die. It is the nature of experimental treatments that most of the patients don't make it. Some do. Sometimes the patient pulls through. I recently heard from a patient who had not flown with us in months. When I first started, he would be here every week or two and I flew him several times. Then he sort of disappeared from the mission rosters, and I assumed the worst. He had some sort of leukaemia, after all. But it turned out he was simply down to a two visits a year now, for monitoring. He is in remission. Sometimes, you win one. It makes it easier to keep going. Michael |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixed | What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixe | Military Aviation | 3 | August 21st 04 12:40 AM |
Logging approaches | Ron Garrison | Instrument Flight Rules | 109 | March 2nd 04 05:54 PM |