![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Andrew wrote: ATC says "radar contact, 20 miles south of XYZ, proceed on course". Do you acknowledge this transmission? Yes. How about when ATC says "altimeter setting 2992" on your first contact after a handoff? Does this require acknowledgement? No, none is desired either. In the past, I've acknowledged such things if the controller was not busy. But I've heard all kinds. Some people read back the altimeter setting. Worst of the bunch. I've even heard people reading back the "radar contact" message. I feel that this is a waste of bandwidth. Yes. However, I don't know what ATC prefers. Do they want read back for everything, No. or should we shut up as much as possible? Pretty much. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, Newps said:
How about when ATC says "altimeter setting 2992" on your first contact after a handoff? Does this require acknowledgement? No, none is desired either. However, some Canadian controllers, if you don't read it back, will give it to you again. But other Canadian controllers say it's not required. You can't win. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ Knuth is definitely the ******* something from hell. I just admire him from a distance, it's safer. -- Peter da Silva |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was flying through Chicago last night, VFR outside class B. The
controller was busy. When he said "01U radar contact, xx miles from yy" I decided to not say anything back. He was busy talking to many airplanes. A few minutes later, he repeated the "01U radar contact, xx miles from yy". I guess he wanted an acknowledgement, even though he was busy. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've found that in the Midwest, they like a response even if they are busy.
I've found that down south when they are busy, they want you to keep quiet. I try to go with the flow but realize that you don't know what the flow is on initial call up. Jim "Andrew" wrote in message ups.com... I was flying through Chicago last night, VFR outside class B. The controller was busy. When he said "01U radar contact, xx miles from yy" I decided to not say anything back. He was busy talking to many airplanes. A few minutes later, he repeated the "01U radar contact, xx miles from yy". I guess he wanted an acknowledgement, even though he was busy. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andrew" wrote in message
I was flying through Chicago last night, VFR outside class B. The controller was busy. When he said "01U radar contact, xx miles from yy" I decided to not say anything back. He was busy talking to many airplanes. A few minutes later, he repeated the "01U radar contact, xx miles from yy". I guess he wanted an acknowledgement, even though he was busy. He *needs* an acknowledgement. moo |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
"Andrew" wrote: I was flying through Chicago last night, VFR outside class B. The controller was busy. When he said "01U radar contact, xx miles from yy" I decided to not say anything back. He was busy talking to many airplanes. A few minutes later, he repeated the "01U radar contact, xx miles from yy". I guess he wanted an acknowledgement, even though he was busy. Just respond back something like 7-sierra-papa...just last of your tail# is sufficient typically -- Chris Schmelzer, MD Capt, 110th Fighter Michigan ANG University of Michigan Hospitals Ann Arbor, MI |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
In the past, I've acknowledged such things if the controller was not busy. But I've heard all kinds. Some people read back the altimeter setting. Worst of the bunch. Tough cookies. You're getting it read back because that's my memory aid. ![]() -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter R." wrote in message
... Newps wrote: In the past, I've acknowledged such things if the controller was not busy. But I've heard all kinds. Some people read back the altimeter setting. Worst of the bunch. Tough cookies. You're getting it read back because that's my memory aid. ![]() It's better than just a memory aid (though that's useful too). A readback of information like that is critical to air safety. No big deal if you get the last digit wrong, but if you mess up something to the left of the decimal, that's serious business. Best to check and make sure you heard it right the first time. A controller that thinks it's dumb to read back the altimeter setting is probably not even listening to the readback. Obviously in that situation, the readback is useless. But other controllers aren't so inconsiderate. Of course, as the FAA has recently decided, if ATC fails to correct an incorrect readback, the pilot is still to blame for whatever happens subsequently. It's no wonder at least one controller has such a blasé attitude about the issue. He's safe, dumb, and happy sitting in his chair, while the pilot takes all the risk. Pete |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... It's better than just a memory aid (though that's useful too). A readback of information like that is critical to air safety. No big deal if you get the last digit wrong, but if you mess up something to the left of the decimal, that's serious business. Best to check and make sure you heard it right the first time. Altimeter settings don't tend to vary a great deal from one controller to the next. If you're issued one that differs by more than a few points from the previous then it's a good idea to check on it. Of course, as the FAA has recently decided, if ATC fails to correct an incorrect readback, the pilot is still to blame for whatever happens subsequently. The FAA never made any decision like that or changed the requirements for controllers to verify readbacks. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
Altimeter settings don't tend to vary a great deal from one controller to the next. If you're issued one that differs by more than a few points from the previous then it's a good idea to check on it. I rarely get an altimeter setting from a controller anyway. I make a point of picking up the setting from AWOS stations in flight and from ATIS before arrival or departure. As long as you tell the controller you have the ATIS, about the only time they'll give you the setting is as a gentle notice that you don't seem to be flying at the altitude at which you're supposed to be. George Patterson There's plenty of room for all of God's creatures. Right next to the mashed potatoes. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What F-102 units were called up for Viet Nam | Tarver Engineering | Military Aviation | 101 | March 5th 06 03:13 AM |