![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Orval is correct on the miscellaneous parts that will need attention -
corroded wheel hups cause @250 per half, hydraulic actuators about the same. There is a SB1006 on wing corrosion that requires that the tanks be pulled (might as well do that anyway to replace the hoses as they will be cracked by now). It's likely that Lycoming will insist that the engine core be junked on rebuild. VREF is 10-15% high. In pristine condition, I'd guess the plane might be worth $80K, but people who pay to put aircraft in pristine condition usually lose 50% of the cost of doing so. If you want a nice Arrow, buy one in which someone has already invested that premium. It NEVER pays to buy a project unless you can do virtually of the work yourself, and even at the cost of the parts will just about equal the gain in value. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 9-May-2005, "Paul kgyy" wrote: VREF is 10-15% high. In pristine condition, I'd guess the plane might be worth $80K If you mean "otherwise pristine but with a run-out engine," then the $80K figure is probably too high. But if you can find a very clean Arrow III with the avionics described in this thread, including a Garmin 430, with a zero time or near zero time engine for $80K I would be stunned. II think it would sell very quickly for $10K more. -- -Elliott Drucker |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ORVAL FAIRBAIRN wrote:
In article , "Dude" wrote: "Steve Foley" wrote in message ... Figure out what it would cost to pay to get it fixed, and what it would be worth after the repairs. Subtract the repair cost from the final value - that's what you should pay. If you do the work yourself, you should pocket the savings, not the current owner. That will get you the high end value. Another thing to do is factor in risk. In this case, Chuck and his buddies have less risk because they know the plane. However, the likely sales price is what someone else, who doesn't know anything about the plane other than what they can see or pay to find out, is likely to offer. The second method will get a low end, where they should probably start their negotiations. If the operator has been cutting corners on maintenance, you could be surprised at the kind of fleas hiding in that dog! I would expect worn gear trunions, old hoses, leaky fuel bladders, corrosion, a prop that needs expensive AD compliance, crazed glass -- just to name a few starters. That's what I was thinking, and why to me the value of the plane would be $0. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2005-05-07, Chuck wrote:
So, he obviously can't get what he'd like for the plane. The big discussion in the shop area has been what the plane might be worth. And whether it might be worth trying to pick up cheap and fix up. That's easy -- nobody discounts a plane by an amount equal to the cost of the maintenance required to bring it up to full value. For some reason airplanes are sold with a huge "package discount". I could never afford to buy all of the parts required to build my Comanche (much less assemble them!) for what I paid to get it complete and already assembled. -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This may help:
We replaced the engine in our '79 Arrow IV (T-tail) a few months ago with a Lyc. factory reman and overhauled the prop at the same time. The only things we didn't relace firewall-forward were the exhaust and the alternator, both of which were only a couple of years old. We now figure the plane has a market value right around $90K. It has a very nice exterior (maybe 8.5/10) and a not bad interior (solid 7/10). Very well equipped. including backup electric AI, but no panel-mount GPS. VERY well maintained by a top shop. To turn your "dog" into a plane like ours, you would probably have to spend: 27K for a reman engine and prop o'haul (including installation) 15K for new paint and interior maybe 10K to resolve other misc. problems. Add another $2K if the Piper service bulletin on fuel hoses has not been done. This assumes no major problems with the airframe, but does assume some needed work on the landing gear (like main gear bushings). The Garmin 430 probably adds $5K to the value, and maybe 3K premium for the straight tail vs the T. That works out to about $46K, based on the 90K starting point. So an asking price of $50K is not wildly optimistic. I'd guess that of the costs listed above, A&P labor probably amounts to around $7K to $12K, so if you have the time and inclination, and if the seller will take $45K, you might just have a good deal. One final consideration: the lead time for reman and factory o'haul IO-360s from Lycoming can get long. We had to wait many weeks for ours. You can use that time to do the paint, interior, and other stuff (assuming the needed services are available at the field where the plane is), but you are likely to be grounded for a long time after the purchase. -- -Elliott Drucker |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chuck,
There is a myth about "project airplanes" that somehow the numbers will work out. They rarely do. It almost never happens that the purchase price is low enough to make it worthwhile. A neglected plane has all sorts of "surprises" in store. Planes not only need repair, they need constant upgrading and replacement of old "stuff" that may not have broken yet. I'm sure the Arrow you are looking at has none of this done. Also, getting an airplane in such poor condition back to flying snuff usually take LOTS of time on the phone and LOTS of time needling suppliers to get stuff fixed and LOTS of time going up blind alleys locating parts. Are you guys trying to take on a 12-18 month project? Do you want to fly or to get a risky education while fixing? If you want to fly, get the money and buy a decent bird. 99 times out of 100 it will cost way LESS than what you are contemplating. There is really no way to make this work. Even at salvage value of about $18k, once you add it up, it still makes little sense. $25 k for the engine and firewall forward, $10k for the paint job, $6k for the interior rehab. You are in the mid 50s. All you need is a bad call from the prop shop to put you over budget compared to getting a ready-to-go bird. Add in a couple of cracked landing gear components and you are really under water. This all assumes the avionics are recent vintage and working properly- bet they are not. MAYBE it would work if one of you is an A&P with a place to work on it AND you got it for free. This does not sound silly if you think about it objectively. Would you buy a house under the terms proposed? Probably not. I would not recommend going into this transaction. I would rather spend the 12-18 months trying to find the right plane. Good Luck, Mike Hi everyone, I thought I'd throw this out for discussion and see what comes from some of the experienced people on the list. I'm helping out some at a local school. The owner of the school is a REAL penny pincher. He scrimps and saves anywhere he can. He'd reuse oil if he could (he already fights with the A&Ps about reusing old spark plugs). But in the process, he's let his fleet go to hell -- and I mean REALLY to hell. .stuff snipped about the plane |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the collector car world the wisdom is that it takes twice as much to make
a number 3 into a number 2 than the difference between them at purchase. You can never (completely) restore low mileage into a high mileage vehicle. The poster seems to be agreeing with some of what was suggested in the earlier "used aircraft valuation" thread. I particularly note the opinion that "MAYBE it would work if one of you is an A&P with a place to work on it AND you got it for free." The only guarantee seems to be that there WILL be maintenance costs and that they will almost always be more numerous AND larger than we would hope. Blue skies to all "Mike Spera" wrote in message ink.net... Chuck, There is a myth about "project airplanes" that somehow the numbers will work out. They rarely do. It almost never happens that the purchase price is low enough to make it worthwhile. A neglected plane has all sorts of "surprises" in store. Planes not only need repair, they need constant upgrading and replacement of old "stuff" that may not have broken yet. I'm sure the Arrow you are looking at has none of this done. Also, getting an airplane in such poor condition back to flying snuff usually take LOTS of time on the phone and LOTS of time needling suppliers to get stuff fixed and LOTS of time going up blind alleys locating parts. Are you guys trying to take on a 12-18 month project? Do you want to fly or to get a risky education while fixing? If you want to fly, get the money and buy a decent bird. 99 times out of 100 it will cost way LESS than what you are contemplating. There is really no way to make this work. Even at salvage value of about $18k, once you add it up, it still makes little sense. $25 k for the engine and firewall forward, $10k for the paint job, $6k for the interior rehab. You are in the mid 50s. All you need is a bad call from the prop shop to put you over budget compared to getting a ready-to-go bird. Add in a couple of cracked landing gear components and you are really under water. This all assumes the avionics are recent vintage and working properly- bet they are not. MAYBE it would work if one of you is an A&P with a place to work on it AND you got it for free. This does not sound silly if you think about it objectively. Would you buy a house under the terms proposed? Probably not. I would not recommend going into this transaction. I would rather spend the 12-18 months trying to find the right plane. Good Luck, Mike Hi everyone, I thought I'd throw this out for discussion and see what comes from some of the experienced people on the list. I'm helping out some at a local school. The owner of the school is a REAL penny pincher. He scrimps and saves anywhere he can. He'd reuse oil if he could (he already fights with the A&Ps about reusing old spark plugs). But in the process, he's let his fleet go to hell -- and I mean REALLY to hell. .stuff snipped about the plane |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is an airplane shaped hole in the air you are going to fill with
money... Run screaming for the exit while you have the chance... denny |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The frustrating part of buying airplanes like this is that, yes, you
might be able to make it work out if you could buy it for $20K, but if the seller hangs in there, eventually someone will pay too much for it. Heck, he can do a $12K field overhaul and peddle it to another flight school or to someone who doesn't want to pay more than $200 for a pre-buy inspection. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What this owner should do is find a mid-time used engine from a junk
yard or such. Then he would have a non-runout cruddy rental airplane at the right investment level. It's hard to discount the price enough to reflect the major. And even if had a zero time engine all the sudden, it wouldn't be worth what you think cuz the airframe is barking. I second the poster who was worrried about gear parts--they are a problem on this airplane. Betcha the prop needs some expensive parts too!! Risk is pretty high even at zero investment. Bill Hale |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fun weekend buying an Arrow (long) | Jack Allison | Owning | 44 | April 20th 05 12:29 PM |
Fun weekend buying an Arrow (long) | Jack Allison | Piloting | 45 | April 20th 05 12:29 PM |
Getting used to the Arrow...and I like it...a lot! | Jack Allison | Piloting | 37 | April 19th 05 03:56 PM |
Ongoing Arrow alternator/charging problem | Chuck | Owning | 6 | December 22nd 04 01:18 AM |
CF-105 AVRO Arrow etc. | Ed Majden | Military Aviation | 4 | February 22nd 04 07:00 PM |