A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Another Intercept, but this time it's different



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 28th 05, 03:24 AM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 27 May 2005 10:00:15 -0700, "aluckyguess" wrote in
::

I thought he went above 18000 feet and not talking to approach.and that was
why they detained him.


No mention of that at the link in the article that started this
thread:

PALMDALE, Calif. — A small plane that repeatedly ventured close to
restricted air space at Edwards Air Force Base (search) was
intercepted by two F-15 fighter jets (search) Thursday and
escorted to a local airport. The FBI was interviewing the pilot
and a passenger, officials said.

The twin-engine Aero Commander plane was spotted flying in the
high desert north of Los Angeles for several hours during the
afternoon at about 18,000 feet and could not be identified or
contacted by the Federal Aviation Administration, agency spokesman
Donn Walker said.

The plane approached restricted air space several times and the
FAA (search) notified Western Air Defense (search), which
scrambled military jets, officials said.

The aircraft was escorted to Palmdale Airport, FBI spokeswoman
Laura Eimiller said. It wasn't immediately clear why the pilot
didn't respond or what the plane was doing near the air base.

  #2  
Old May 28th 05, 05:16 AM
Montblack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

("Larry Dighera" wrote)
[snip]
The twin-engine Aero Commander plane was spotted flying in the
high desert north of Los Angeles for several hours during the
afternoon at about 18,000 feet and could not be identified or
contacted by the Federal Aviation Administration, agency spokesman
Donn Walker said.



Possible radio problems in a 150 - ok. Harder to swallow when it's an Aero
Commander.

OT - Speaking of Aero Commanders, I saw the Pella Windows corporate jet a
few weeks ago at the Pella, Iowa airport open house. Talked with the crew.
It's an Aero Commander jet. Israeli company converts them - see link.

http://tinyurl.com/a7duk
Israel IAI-1124A Westwind


Montblack

  #3  
Old May 28th 05, 04:02 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 27 May 2005 23:16:41 -0500, "Montblack"
wrote in
::

("Larry Dighera" wrote)
[snip]
The twin-engine Aero Commander plane was spotted flying in the
high desert north of Los Angeles for several hours during the
afternoon at about 18,000 feet and could not be identified or
contacted by the Federal Aviation Administration, agency spokesman
Donn Walker said.



Possible radio problems in a 150 - ok. Harder to swallow when it's an Aero
Commander.


There is no requirement to be monitoring the radio below 18,000' in
that area. Without more details, it's difficult to know how
appropriate this intercept may have been.
  #4  
Old May 28th 05, 01:57 AM
joe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Larry Dighera wrote:
Is this intercept of an aircraft that hadn't breached restricted
airspace a reaction to the rather late intercept of the Cessna 150 in
DC?

On 27 May 2005 15:04:06 GMT, wrote in
::

The pilot and passenger were being interviewed at an FBI satellite office
in Lancaster, Eimiller said.


There doesn't seem to have been probable cause to divert this flight
nor detain the pilot and his passengers. Also, why would the pilot
submit to interrogation in this instance if he knew he hadn't entered
Restricted airspace? I suppose that if he didn't, our government
would have labeled him an Enemy Combatant, and taken him Syria for
further interrogation. :-(

This government 'security' activity just keeps getting curiouser and
curiouser. Bureaucratic fear and overreaction are leading to
citizens' complete loss of civil rights. Appalling.



What's also appalling.... Last night there was another ADIZ incursion.
Seems a fellow pilot skirted the eastern edge flying north from norfolk
va area. The F-15's intercepted him forced him to land and handcuffed
him in front of his two small children.... this is bull****... The TSA
is out of control.

its time to throw the tea in to the bay

joey

  #5  
Old May 28th 05, 02:13 AM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"joe" wrote in message
oups.com...


Larry Dighera wrote:
Is this intercept of an aircraft that hadn't breached restricted
airspace a reaction to the rather late intercept of the Cessna 150 in
DC?

On 27 May 2005 15:04:06 GMT, wrote in
::

The pilot and passenger were being interviewed at an FBI satellite

office
in Lancaster, Eimiller said.


There doesn't seem to have been probable cause to divert this flight
nor detain the pilot and his passengers. Also, why would the pilot
submit to interrogation in this instance if he knew he hadn't entered
Restricted airspace? I suppose that if he didn't, our government
would have labeled him an Enemy Combatant, and taken him Syria for
further interrogation. :-(

This government 'security' activity just keeps getting curiouser and
curiouser. Bureaucratic fear and overreaction are leading to
citizens' complete loss of civil rights. Appalling.



What's also appalling.... Last night there was another ADIZ incursion.
Seems a fellow pilot skirted the eastern edge flying north from norfolk
va area. The F-15's intercepted him forced him to land and handcuffed
him in front of his two small children.... this is bull****... The TSA
is out of control.

its time to throw the tea in to the bay

Or it's time to kick these bozo's asses that can't fly without flirting with
"danger".




  #6  
Old May 28th 05, 01:27 PM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Matt Barrow wrote:

"joe" wrote in message
oups.com...


Larry Dighera wrote:

Is this intercept of an aircraft that hadn't breached restricted
airspace a reaction to the rather late intercept of the Cessna 150 in
DC?

On 27 May 2005 15:04:06 GMT, wrote in
::


The pilot and passenger were being interviewed at an FBI satellite


office

in Lancaster, Eimiller said.

There doesn't seem to have been probable cause to divert this flight
nor detain the pilot and his passengers. Also, why would the pilot
submit to interrogation in this instance if he knew he hadn't entered
Restricted airspace? I suppose that if he didn't, our government
would have labeled him an Enemy Combatant, and taken him Syria for
further interrogation. :-(

This government 'security' activity just keeps getting curiouser and
curiouser. Bureaucratic fear and overreaction are leading to
citizens' complete loss of civil rights. Appalling.



What's also appalling.... Last night there was another ADIZ incursion.
Seems a fellow pilot skirted the eastern edge flying north from norfolk
va area. The F-15's intercepted him forced him to land and handcuffed
him in front of his two small children.... this is bull****... The TSA
is out of control.

its time to throw the tea in to the bay


Or it's time to kick these bozo's asses that can't fly without flirting with
"danger".


I'd say both. No excuse for dumb pilots, but also no excuse for many of
our "security" restrictions these days either.


Matt
  #7  
Old May 28th 05, 02:52 PM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
Matt Barrow wrote:



Or it's time to kick these bozo's asses that can't fly without flirting

with
"danger".


I'd say both. No excuse for dumb pilots, but also no excuse for many of
our "security" restrictions these days either.


Given that there was, overall, merely and uproar resulting from these
episodes, would you rather they over-react, or under-react? Finding the
exactly right balance is not something humans seem to gravitate to,
especially bureaucracies.

Remember, 9/11 was Bush's fault for not acting sooner, but he would have
caught hell for anything other than appointing a study commission.


--
Matt
---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO


  #8  
Old May 28th 05, 04:15 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 28 May 2005 12:27:07 GMT, Matt Whiting
wrote in ::

I'd say both. No excuse for dumb pilots, but also no excuse for many of
our "security" restrictions these days either.


That sounds like a rather balanced approach to raising our nation's
consciousness about it's lethal pseudo-security policies toward GA
pilots. If we are seen as publicly chastising errant pilots among our
ranks for their negligence, and at the same time pointing out how
arrogantly inappropriate our nation's shoot-down policy is, we may be
viewed as responsible citizens, and perhaps be able to garner some
public support to end this outrageously stupid policy. All that is
lacking is a realistic alternative policy to replace it.
  #9  
Old May 28th 05, 02:28 AM
Montblack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

("joe" wrote)
[snip]
The F-15's intercepted him forced him to land and handcuffed
him in front of his two small children....



And all without opposable thumbs - a remarkable aircraft. g


its time to throw the tea in to the bay


I fear too many have already drunk the Kool-Aid.


Montblack

  #10  
Old May 28th 05, 03:43 AM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Montblack" wrote in message
...
("joe" wrote)
[snip]
The F-15's intercepted him forced him to land and handcuffed
him in front of his two small children....



And all without opposable thumbs - a remarkable aircraft. g


its time to throw the tea in to the bay


I fear too many have already drunk the Kool-Aid.


And ate the pudding.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS9 Time Zone Files in BETA Test DDT Simulators 3 April 5th 04 06:06 PM
FS2002 Clock Time Chris Simulators 0 November 6th 03 08:02 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
they took me back in time and the nsa or japan wired my head and now they know the idea came from me so if your back in time and wounder what happen they change tim liverance history for good. I work at rts wright industries and it a time travel trap tim liverance Military Aviation 0 August 18th 03 12:18 AM
Best Software and Hardware for Turn Area Task? Snead1 Soaring 29 August 13th 03 04:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.