![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Rapoport" writes:
I suspect that there are a lot of reasons including: Certification issues Availible engineering resources Slow implementation of LPV approaches by FAA There are many tens of thousands of 430s and 530 installed and upgrading them represents a lot of revenue for Garmin, so I doubt that they are just sitting on their hands. My cynical view is different. Garmin announced WAAS upgradeability to compete with the CNX80. Garmin acquired UPSAT, and with it the CNX80, eliminating competition. WAAS upgrade for the GNS series, you ask... yeah, um... -jav |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Stutzman writes:
In rec.aviation.owning Mike Rapoport wrote: There are many tens of thousands of 430s and 530 installed and upgrading them represents a lot of revenue for Garmin, so I doubt that they are just sitting on their hands. But at the $1500 price that Garmin has publically committed to is it that big of a revenue stream for them? I mean its not chump change for some of us, but considering what needs to happen to a 430 for this to work (new software, new processor, new re-certification(?), the overhead of a whole upgrade program), I'm surpised that Garmin can even break even at that price. See my cynical view posting of earlier. The ship-by date on this alleged upgrade has been steadily slipping. Now it's a year away. yawn Wake me up when the sucker starts shipping. Oh yeah, bonus points if you can find out how to get on the waiting list for this alleged upgrade. -jav |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Frank Stutzman" wrote in message ... In rec.aviation.owning Mike Rapoport wrote: There are many tens of thousands of 430s and 530 installed and upgrading them represents a lot of revenue for Garmin, so I doubt that they are just sitting on their hands. But at the $1500 price that Garmin has publically committed to is it that big of a revenue stream for them? I mean its not chump change for some of us, but considering what needs to happen to a 430 for this to work (new software, new processor, new re-certification(?), the overhead of a whole upgrade program), I'm surpised that Garmin can even break even at that price. -- Frank Stutzman Bonanza N494B "Hula Girl" Hood River, OR Garmin will probably do a little under $200MM this year in total aviation revenue. When you consider that the potential WAAS upgrade market is about $90MM and that they will also be able to charge more for 430/530 units that have WAAS, it is a significant market for them. When and if the FAA publishes a significant number of LPV approaches, nobody will be able to sell a non-WAAS box so they have to add the functionality eventually. Perhaps they know more about how many new approaches the FAA is going to commission than we do? Why doesn't Honeywell have a WAAS box out? Mike MU-2 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Javier Henderson" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" writes: I suspect that there are a lot of reasons including: Certification issues Availible engineering resources Slow implementation of LPV approaches by FAA There are many tens of thousands of 430s and 530 installed and upgrading them represents a lot of revenue for Garmin, so I doubt that they are just sitting on their hands. My cynical view is different. Garmin announced WAAS upgradeability to compete with the CNX80. Garmin acquired UPSAT, and with it the CNX80, eliminating competition. WAAS upgrade for the GNS series, you ask... yeah, um... -jav That makes no sense from their point of view. They make money by coming up with new things to sell you. Mike MU-2 |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Rapoport" writes:
"Javier Henderson" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" writes: I suspect that there are a lot of reasons including: Certification issues Availible engineering resources Slow implementation of LPV approaches by FAA There are many tens of thousands of 430s and 530 installed and upgrading them represents a lot of revenue for Garmin, so I doubt that they are just sitting on their hands. My cynical view is different. Garmin announced WAAS upgradeability to compete with the CNX80. Garmin acquired UPSAT, and with it the CNX80, eliminating competition. WAAS upgrade for the GNS series, you ask... yeah, um... -jav That makes no sense from their point of view. They make money by coming up with new things to sell you. Assuming they make money on those $1500 upgrades... -jav |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Javier Henderson" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" writes: "Javier Henderson" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" writes: I suspect that there are a lot of reasons including: Certification issues Availible engineering resources Slow implementation of LPV approaches by FAA There are many tens of thousands of 430s and 530 installed and upgrading them represents a lot of revenue for Garmin, so I doubt that they are just sitting on their hands. My cynical view is different. Garmin announced WAAS upgradeability to compete with the CNX80. Garmin acquired UPSAT, and with it the CNX80, eliminating competition. WAAS upgrade for the GNS series, you ask... yeah, um... -jav That makes no sense from their point of view. They make money by coming up with new things to sell you. Assuming they make money on those $1500 upgrades... -jav True. I suspect that if you take out the developement costs (which they would incur anyway), that they will make some (perhaps not much) money. Mike MU-2 |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Javier Henderson" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" writes: My cynical view is different. Garmin announced WAAS upgradeability to compete with the CNX80. Garmin acquired UPSAT, and with it the CNX80, eliminating competition. WAAS upgrade for the GNS series, you ask... yeah, um... One of forty-some WAAS enabled products they carry. http://www.garmin.com/aboutGPS/waas.html |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Javier Henderson" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" writes: "Javier Henderson" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" writes: That makes no sense from their point of view. They make money by coming up with new things to sell you. Assuming they make money on those $1500 upgrades... Even if they don't (I'm guessing they don't) it's in their long-term interest to do so. Only Microsoft and government can do better and better (revenue-wise) the worse their performance becomes. -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote: Why doesn't Honeywell have a WAAS box out? Never mind WAAS, why does Honeywell *still* not have a GPS/NAV/COMM box out? Answer: Honeywell has its head in in a very dark, warm place. -- Dan C-172RG at BFM |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message k.net... "Javier Henderson" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" writes: I suspect that there are a lot of reasons including: Certification issues Availible engineering resources Slow implementation of LPV approaches by FAA There are many tens of thousands of 430s and 530 installed and upgrading them represents a lot of revenue for Garmin, so I doubt that they are just sitting on their hands. My cynical view is different. Garmin announced WAAS upgradeability to compete with the CNX80. Garmin acquired UPSAT, and with it the CNX80, eliminating competition. WAAS upgrade for the GNS series, you ask... yeah, um... -jav That makes no sense from their point of view. They make money by coming up with new things to sell you. Mike MU-2 Yes, I agree that Garmin will make more money by selling something new. Why bother with upgrading the 430 when the 480 is selling and is so much better ? I think they will finish the engineering of the G1000 related stuff and they will announce a complete new box making 430's and 480's obsolete. In modern day digital terms, the 430 is yesterday's CPU. Why bother retrofitting it with a maths co-processor ? -- Roy N5804F - On old PA28-181 Piper Archer II with steam gages ! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any inside story re 430/530 WAAS cert.? | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | May 20th 05 06:13 PM |
Garmin GNS430 & WAAS | Roy Page | Owning | 33 | April 7th 05 04:02 AM |
WAAS and Garmin 430/530 | DoodyButch | Owning | 23 | October 13th 03 04:06 AM |
Terminology of New WAAS, VNAV, LPV approach types | Tarver Engineering | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | August 5th 03 03:50 AM |
Garmin Behind the Curve on WAAS GPS VNAV Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 18th 03 01:43 PM |