![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter wrote:
The UK Department for Transport has published a consultation document; their aim is as stated above. What's the stated logic behind this? George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The UK Department for Transport has published a consultation document;
their aim is as stated above. What's the stated logic behind this? http://tinyurl.com/ar229 for all the documents at the DFT website. I've not had time to read them, so if someone beats me to it for a summary! D. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() David Wright wrote: The UK Department for Transport has published a consultation document; their aim is as stated above. What's the stated logic behind this? http://tinyurl.com/ar229 for all the documents at the DFT website. I've not had time to read them, so if someone beats me to it for a summary! D. The logic is that they are looking at stopping the practice of permanently basing an aircraft in the UK but keeping the ownership and regisration in some other country. According to the documents, they are looking at the fact that something on the order of 21% of the aircraft in the UK spend all of their time in UK airspace despite being foreign registered. The gist of it is that they want to place a time limit on how long you can keep a foreign registered aircraft in the UK without changing the regisration. It's only a proposal for now and they are requestion comments until late October. Craig C. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George Patterson a écrit :
Peter wrote: The UK Department for Transport has published a consultation document; their aim is as stated above. What's the stated logic behind this? George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. If I was a U.K citizen I would fight this one real hard and try to stop it NOW. We have seen this happen in France (and with luck fail!). IMHO mainly motivated by bureaucrats wanting to avoid having pilots using their FAA licence to fly in France. 20 years ago it was not a problem at all for a french citizen to go to the U.S, pass his pilot exams and come back to fly F- registered aircraft after a single stop to the local DGAC office.....I've done it. Not anymore unless you are a U.S resident! This having nothing to do with safety issues, to the contrary but simply to atempt to *HELP* french flight schools who, at that time, saw many students go West. Today if you reside in the US (or outside of the E.U) - You come to France with a US licence, you can fly F registered aircraft without a single hour of flight instruction! (altough I would highly recommend it in regards to *MAJOR* diffrences such as flight levels, barometrics pressures in MB, and phraseology over the Com). But if you are a French citizen and reside in the E.U, your 'in for taking all of the French written exams and flight tests if you want to fly F-registered aircraft. The solution is to find "N" registered aircraft, with greater and greater numbers, so one can use, regardless of nationality or place of residence, is F.A.A licence will all ratings. As mentionned in this forum this is just about the only way private pilots can fly I.F.R in France....a private IFR licence has been talked about for years....to no avail. The *REAL IFR* ticket is not really in reach of the "standard" business / family / adult pilot unless he has 20K¤, a year and brain cells to spare on totally irelevant material to the private IR pilot. IMHO G.A in Europe is nearly dead and I personnally rather go to the U.S twice a year for some real flying / travelling, spending my money with people who respect G.A. Best of luck in the U.K. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Olivier Demacon wrote:
Today if you reside in the US (or outside of the E.U) - You come to France with a US licence, you can fly F registered aircraft without a single hour of flight instruction! ... But if you are a French citizen and reside in the E.U, your 'in for taking all of the French written exams and flight tests if you want to fly F-registered aircraft. what about a French citizen who is a US resident? --Sylvain |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sylvain a écrit :
Olivier Demacon wrote: Today if you reside in the US (or outside of the E.U) - You come to France with a US licence, you can fly F registered aircraft without a single hour of flight instruction! ... But if you are a French citizen and reside in the E.U, your 'in for taking all of the French written exams and flight tests if you want to fly F-registered aircraft. what about a French citizen who is a US resident? --Sylvain No problem at all. This was done to stop French residing citizen to go to the US, get there licence and fly in France. But if you reside outside the US (since France cannot go against ICAO agreement!) you can get your US licence validated in order to fly F registered aircrafts. Olivier |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | June 2nd 04 07:17 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | May 1st 04 07:29 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 03:04 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 2 | February 2nd 04 11:41 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |