![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... The one's I've flown take maybe 20-30 seconds. So, you just lead them a little more while the landing airplane is rolling out. Lead them a little more? You mean delay the takeoff clearance a little more, don't you? I don't think this is any less safe then P&H. The problem with P&H is not in holding aircraft on a runway, it's in clearing other aircraft to land while aircraft are holding in position on the runway. The solution is simple; stop clearing aircraft to land when aircraft are holding in position. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 21:40:25 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote: "Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... A lot of time? I don't see it. Unless the hold line is way back from the runway, I can typically taxi onto the active and be rolling at full throttle in 10 seconds or less. All they need to do is clear me for takeoff when the airplane that just landed is 10 seconds or so from clearing the runway and no time at all will be lost. How long do you think it takes a heavy to do the same? A DC-9 isn't a heavy, but I was on one at Philli International who was bringing up the power during the turn onto the runway. We could hear the tire squeal inside the plane. Still, I'd probably be able to get out there and rolling sooner than he could. OTOH he could be "way up there" while I'm just leaving the pattern. I've always found it a bit intimidating to be taxiing behind something I could taxi under, particularly with the knowledge there is another big one right behind that I hope doesn't forget I'm there. Several times I've been looking at a quarter mile, or longer, line of planes ahead and heard, Thirty Three Romeo, turn on next taxiway, hold short for departing traffic. Expect intersection departure. When they said cleared for departure it had the word "expedite" in there. (Do they still do that? Intersection take offs mixing with the big guys. I haven't been into one of the really busy airports in over 6 or 7 years.) Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 01:47:29 -0400, Roger
wrote: Several times I've been looking at a quarter mile, or longer, line of planes ahead and heard, Thirty Three Romeo, turn on next taxiway, hold short for departing traffic. Expect intersection departure. When they said cleared for departure it had the word "expedite" in there. (Do they still do that? Intersection take offs mixing with the big guys. I haven't been into one of the really busy airports in over 6 or 7 years.) I was leaving KIAD once in the 172 and got an intersection departure from Y (or maybe Z, but I think Y) from 30, skipping ahead of a jet or two that was back at the threshold. aw |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roger" wrote Several times I've been looking at a quarter mile, or longer, line of planes ahead and heard, Thirty Three Romeo, turn on next taxiway, hold short for departing traffic. Expect intersection departure. When they said cleared for departure it had the word "expedite" in there. (Do they still do that? So they let you jump line, so you could get off quicker? Cool! -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's not going away for everybody. Selected airports may lose it.
You'll never see the major airports lose it. Matt Whiting wrote: Robert M. Gary wrote: That's hard to believe. P&H really saves a lot of time when the runway is really busy. The only way I can see this working is if pilot learn how to do "cleared for immediate takeoff". Most controllers avoid this because "immediate" for many pilots means sitting on the runway while they go through their last checklist. A lot of time? I don't see it. Unless the hold line is way back from the runway, I can typically taxi onto the active and be rolling at full throttle in 10 seconds or less. All they need to do is clear me for takeoff when the airplane that just landed is 10 seconds or so from clearing the runway and no time at all will be lost. Matt |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Something I heard on the radio a few months ago while overflying KCMA:
PLANE: Camarillo Tower, Cessna 123 at runway... uh... twenty six. TOWER: Cessna 123, say your intentions. PLANE: I'd like to take off. TOWER: Cessna 123, position and hold, runway two six. PLANE: Um, I'm at runway two six. TOWER: Roger, position and hold on runway two six. PLANE: Well, my position is runway two six, and I don't understand what you mean. TOWER: Confirm, Cessna 123, you're at runway two six and you're NOT on the runway? PLANE: Yeah, and I'm holding my position here. TOWER: Drive onto the runway and hold your position, Cessna 123. PLANE: (pilot keys transmit button, but there's a long silence as he tries to wrap his head around the instruction until ![]() TOWER: (pause, teeth gnashing sounds inserted by my imagination.) Cessna 123, cleared for takeoff, runway two six. PLANE: Cleared for takeoff, Cessna 123......(five second pause, then he keys up again).....oh, and I'm departing to the right. Sometimes, I think that radio conversations like this are staged for the benefit of making nearby student pilots feel better about their radio work. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ben Hallert" wrote Sometimes, I think that radio conversations like this are staged for the benefit of making nearby student pilots feel better about their radio work. Nah, there are really people out there taking lessons that are *that* clueless. I've heard quite a few conversations that bad, and worse. Some of them end up being requested to call the tower. Some of them are told on air that they are getting violated, and a number to call. I often wonder how many of these end up getting their ticket. More of them than should, I suppose. Sigh. -- Jim in NC |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ben Hallert" wrote in message ups.com... Something I heard on the radio a few months ago while overflying KCMA: PLANE: Camarillo Tower, Cessna 123 at runway... uh... twenty six. TOWER: Cessna 123, say your intentions. PLANE: I'd like to take off. TOWER: Cessna 123, position and hold, runway two six. PLANE: Um, I'm at runway two six. TOWER: Roger, position and hold on runway two six. PLANE: Well, my position is runway two six, and I don't understand what you mean. TOWER: Confirm, Cessna 123, you're at runway two six and you're NOT on the runway? PLANE: Yeah, and I'm holding my position here. TOWER: Drive onto the runway and hold your position, Cessna 123. PLANE: (pilot keys transmit button, but there's a long silence as he tries to wrap his head around the instruction until ![]() TOWER: (pause, teeth gnashing sounds inserted by my imagination.) Cessna 123, cleared for takeoff, runway two six. PLANE: Cleared for takeoff, Cessna 123......(five second pause, then he keys up again).....oh, and I'm departing to the right. Sometimes, I think that radio conversations like this are staged for the benefit of making nearby student pilots feel better about their radio work. A couple of years ago the phrase "taxi into position and hold" was shortened to "position and hold". I've noticed it's caused a bit of confusion even among experienced pilots. It seems it's being interpreted as "hold your position". |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Can "is different than "do". Just hang out at your local airport and
watch the average GA drivers. You'd be amazed at the amount of time people spend sitting on the runway. -Robert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Position and Hold at uncontrolled field | dave | Piloting | 42 | February 26th 04 01:25 AM |
Hold "as published"? | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 83 | November 13th 03 03:19 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |