A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Auto Tow Information



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 20th 05, 06:29 AM
Frank Whiteley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Single drum turn around time is similar to autotow. If you retrieve
your rope at 15mph, it will take 5+minutes to get the rope back to the
launch point on a 6000ft run and another minute to get the tow car back
to the other end. Then the launch take up and launch you are talking
10 minute cycles or 6 launches per hour. If you're flying one Blanik,
or 5-6 gliders in a small club, this is fine. With parafil, we ran 4-6
minute cycle times. Similar to our single drum winch cycles with a
good retrieve driver and launch crew. Cotswold GC with the reverse
pulley managed 3-minute launch rates, but that was a club with about 70
gliders and 200 members. They also had a second RP rig and a tow plane
(used for those elusive wave days). Now a winch is their primary
launch method. Essex GC at one time claimed 90 sec launch intervals
with two vehicles on an RP system, but that was not the standard rate.
It was a somewhat shorter run the Cotswold.

Unless some care is taken with the installation of a Schweizer release,
it is possible to get it into a position where it can't release at the
tow vehicle, just like in the tow planes. We happened to have a TOST.
We knew it would work if fired in anger. The Cotswold RP release is a
homebuilt type. It's not an expensive system, but does require someone
with machine skills to construct and maintain it. The real plus is
that the large diameter 'pulley wheel' doesn't store any substantial
energy, unlike some other designs with large wheels. Similarly, it
doesn't 'steal' any power to get the launch up and running. Like
autotow, it's best suited for 5000-6000ft run, to allow about 1000ft
for landback and staging and high performance. You do need a clear
safety zone at the pulley end also, in the event of a wire break.

There are plenty of Yank tanks out there that could allow a small club
with a rope to do plenty of flying on a budget with a small learning
curve. So if you're a group of ten with a Blanik and bridle hooks,
that's a way forward. But it has it's limitations built in and a club
can outgrow it's capacity pretty quickly. I found the linked article
about autotow provided earlier in this thread a bit one dimensional and
containing some assertions based on ignorance and second hand
information about winch launching. An alternative is something like
http://www.permiansoaring.us, if you want to grow and make better use
of your available space.

But there is a lot of difference in what you can ramp up in the near
term and aim for in the future. Go for the solution that makes sense,
but plan for the next stage. BTW, we eventually took the engine and
transmission out of the XJ6 Jag and put it into an ex-ATC winch and
converted entirely to winch launching from the parallel turf runway.
Why? Because the new owners of the airfield started an ever increasing
pattern of annual rent increases for the paved runway. The club had
senior rights to the parallel turf run, so abandoned auto tow as an
economic imperative. FWIW, the winches gave higher launches over less
distance. We used less distance because light single's like K-8's,
K-6's, and Oly463's were more subject to adverse wing loading carrying
the weight of the steel wire rope if the length were too long and there
was also a practical limit to wire capacity of the winch drums.

Frank Whiteley

  #2  
Old August 22nd 05, 04:52 PM
Mike Lindsay
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com,
Frank Whiteley writes
Single drum turn around time is similar to autotow. If you retrieve
your rope at 15mph, it will take 5+minutes to get the rope back to the
launch point on a 6000ft run and another minute to get the tow car back
to the other end. Then the launch take up and launch you are talking
10 minute cycles or 6 launches per hour. If you're flying one Blanik,
or 5-6 gliders in a small club, this is fine. With parafil, we ran 4-6
minute cycle times.


Frank, have you ever been to the Midland GC site at the Long Mynd?

The scheme they use is to have a single drum winch, which launches the
glider and a much smaller one which retrieve the cable.

The two cables attach to 2 corners of a triangular piece of iron,
another cable with the launching rings and parachute goes to the
remaining corner. This system has been in use for at least 45 years, and
is the most efficient way I've seen of getting launched. But it wouldn't
work too well on an aerodrome site.




I've not timed it, but it was VERY quick, much quicker than


--
Mike Lindsay
  #3  
Old August 22nd 05, 05:43 PM
Frank Whiteley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes, but we were bungee launching the day we brought the SHK there, so
I didn't get to see the winch in action. Great for a ridgetop site. I
suspect it could be adapted for a longer run also. Have also heard of
HG sites with dual winches allowing those gliders to make 180 turns at
each end.

Frank Whiteley

  #4  
Old August 22nd 05, 10:20 PM
W.J. \(Bill\) Dean \(U.K.\).
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The Mynd "triangle" is made of light alloy now, and there have been a series
of detail small improvements to the gear generally. No parachute is used
when the retrieve winch is in use.

The Mynd winchmaster (Colin Knox) has now built a new retrieve winch, so
there are now two in use at the Mynd (not at the same time!). He has used
an entirely different principle to engage drive when the retrieve starts.

Of much more general interest, Skylaunch have built their second retrieve
winch (the first is of course at the Mynd). They have demonstrated it at
Lasham, and their Chief Flying Instructor has sent the following message to
their Yahoo One List:

"Following a successful midweek retrieve winch trial at Lasham a month
ago we are planning to have a weekend trial and evaluation of the new
system. The planned date for the trial is 10/11th September."

I had always supposed that such a system could not work at an airfield such
as Lasham, obviously I was completely wrong.

W.J. (Bill) Dean (U.K.).
Remove "ic" to reply.


"Mike Lindsay" wrote in message
...


In article .com,
Frank Whiteley writes

Single drum turn around time is similar to autotow. If you retrieve
your rope at 15mph, it will take 5+minutes to get the rope back to the
launch point on a 6000ft run and another minute to get the tow car back
to the other end. Then the launch take up and launch you are talking
10 minute cycles or 6 launches per hour. If you're flying one Blanik,
or 5-6 gliders in a small club, this is fine. With parafil, we ran 4-6
minute cycle times.


Frank, have you ever been to the Midland GC site at the Long Mynd?

The scheme they use is to have a single drum winch, which launches the
glider and a much smaller one which retrieve the cable.

The two cables attach to 2 corners of a triangular piece of iron,
another cable with the launching rings and parachute goes to the
remaining corner. This system has been in use for at least 45 years, and
is the most efficient way I've seen of getting launched. But it wouldn't
work too well on an aerodrome site.

I've not timed it, but it was VERY quick, much quicker than

Mike Lindsay




  #5  
Old August 21st 05, 03:46 AM
Larry Pardue
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Marc Ramsey" wrote in message
news

Many in the group fly in the western US, where summer density altitudes
range up to 10,000 feet. Yes, the numbers I've run indicate that we need
at least a 250 HP turbo diesel (not so much for the HP as the torque) to
be able to launch something as mundane as a Grob 103 with two aboard.


I'm curious about how these calculations work. At Hobbs, NM, elevation
3,700 feet and long runways, the 90 HP winch, using heavy wire, doesn't
have any trouble at all with a Grob 103 loaded with two aboard.

Makes me wonder what we are doing wrong.

Larry Pardue 2I



  #6  
Old August 21st 05, 04:12 AM
Mike Schumann
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

How long is your runway and what altitude do you achieve on launch?

Mike Schumann

"Larry Pardue" wrote in message
...

"Marc Ramsey" wrote in message
news

Many in the group fly in the western US, where summer density altitudes
range up to 10,000 feet. Yes, the numbers I've run indicate that we need
at least a 250 HP turbo diesel (not so much for the HP as the torque) to
be able to launch something as mundane as a Grob 103 with two aboard.


I'm curious about how these calculations work. At Hobbs, NM, elevation
3,700 feet and long runways, the 90 HP winch, using heavy wire, doesn't
have any trouble at all with a Grob 103 loaded with two aboard.

Makes me wonder what we are doing wrong.

Larry Pardue 2I





  #7  
Old August 21st 05, 04:25 AM
Larry Pardue
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Schumann" wrote in message
k.net...
How long is your runway and what altitude do you achieve on launch?

Mike Schumann


As I said, long. From about 7,000 to 8,800. Typical altitudes on launch
are around 1,500 to 2,000+ feet AGL.

Larry Pardue 2I


  #8  
Old August 21st 05, 06:47 AM
Marc Ramsey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Larry Pardue wrote:
"Marc Ramsey" wrote...
Many in the group fly in the western US, where summer density altitudes
range up to 10,000 feet. Yes, the numbers I've run indicate that we need
at least a 250 HP turbo diesel (not so much for the HP as the torque) to
be able to launch something as mundane as a Grob 103 with two aboard.


I'm curious about how these calculations work. At Hobbs, NM, elevation
3,700 feet and long runways, the 90 HP winch, using heavy wire, doesn't
have any trouble at all with a Grob 103 loaded with two aboard.

Makes me wonder what we are doing wrong.


It is purely a function of ones assumptions when performing the
calculations. I'd like to launch a loaded Grob 103 at 8000 foot density
altitude, no wind, to 2000 feet from a 5000 foot runway. My basic
assumption was that to achieve optimal launch height for a given cable
length, one needs to be able to pull hard enough to break the weak link
at any point during the climb. I also assumed that there would be 20%
mechanical losses. This establishes some relatively high minimum HP and
torque levels. If I can I dig up the spreadsheet, I'll post the full
set of numbers.

None of this says that you can't launch a glider on less horsepower, it
just says that you can't get very close to optimal height for a given
length of the runway...

Marc
  #9  
Old August 22nd 05, 10:47 PM
Derrick Steed
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

When I was at Halton 1993 and 1994 they used a retrieve winch at times
with a multi-drum winch (two drum). I don't recall exactly how they were
working the two drums, but I do recall (from having driven it a few
times) that operating the retrieve winch took some care in regard to
timing when to engage it for the retrieve (which I seem to recall was
done just after the glider released and before the cable reached the
ground - therefore it used a parachute). It was quite easy to break the
retrieve cable as I recall.

Maybe someone who was there at Halton and more expert in its
construction and use could pass on some details?

Rgds,

Derrick Steed







 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Washington DC airspace closing for good? tony roberts Piloting 153 August 11th 05 12:56 AM
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots paul k. sanchez Piloting 19 September 27th 04 11:49 PM
ANN: SoaringPilot 1.9.8 Mark Hawkins Soaring 0 April 21st 04 05:09 PM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.