![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Single drum turn around time is similar to autotow. If you retrieve
your rope at 15mph, it will take 5+minutes to get the rope back to the launch point on a 6000ft run and another minute to get the tow car back to the other end. Then the launch take up and launch you are talking 10 minute cycles or 6 launches per hour. If you're flying one Blanik, or 5-6 gliders in a small club, this is fine. With parafil, we ran 4-6 minute cycle times. Similar to our single drum winch cycles with a good retrieve driver and launch crew. Cotswold GC with the reverse pulley managed 3-minute launch rates, but that was a club with about 70 gliders and 200 members. They also had a second RP rig and a tow plane (used for those elusive wave days). Now a winch is their primary launch method. Essex GC at one time claimed 90 sec launch intervals with two vehicles on an RP system, but that was not the standard rate. It was a somewhat shorter run the Cotswold. Unless some care is taken with the installation of a Schweizer release, it is possible to get it into a position where it can't release at the tow vehicle, just like in the tow planes. We happened to have a TOST. We knew it would work if fired in anger. The Cotswold RP release is a homebuilt type. It's not an expensive system, but does require someone with machine skills to construct and maintain it. The real plus is that the large diameter 'pulley wheel' doesn't store any substantial energy, unlike some other designs with large wheels. Similarly, it doesn't 'steal' any power to get the launch up and running. Like autotow, it's best suited for 5000-6000ft run, to allow about 1000ft for landback and staging and high performance. You do need a clear safety zone at the pulley end also, in the event of a wire break. There are plenty of Yank tanks out there that could allow a small club with a rope to do plenty of flying on a budget with a small learning curve. So if you're a group of ten with a Blanik and bridle hooks, that's a way forward. But it has it's limitations built in and a club can outgrow it's capacity pretty quickly. I found the linked article about autotow provided earlier in this thread a bit one dimensional and containing some assertions based on ignorance and second hand information about winch launching. An alternative is something like http://www.permiansoaring.us, if you want to grow and make better use of your available space. But there is a lot of difference in what you can ramp up in the near term and aim for in the future. Go for the solution that makes sense, but plan for the next stage. BTW, we eventually took the engine and transmission out of the XJ6 Jag and put it into an ex-ATC winch and converted entirely to winch launching from the parallel turf runway. Why? Because the new owners of the airfield started an ever increasing pattern of annual rent increases for the paved runway. The club had senior rights to the parallel turf run, so abandoned auto tow as an economic imperative. FWIW, the winches gave higher launches over less distance. We used less distance because light single's like K-8's, K-6's, and Oly463's were more subject to adverse wing loading carrying the weight of the steel wire rope if the length were too long and there was also a practical limit to wire capacity of the winch drums. Frank Whiteley |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
Frank Whiteley writes Single drum turn around time is similar to autotow. If you retrieve your rope at 15mph, it will take 5+minutes to get the rope back to the launch point on a 6000ft run and another minute to get the tow car back to the other end. Then the launch take up and launch you are talking 10 minute cycles or 6 launches per hour. If you're flying one Blanik, or 5-6 gliders in a small club, this is fine. With parafil, we ran 4-6 minute cycle times. Frank, have you ever been to the Midland GC site at the Long Mynd? The scheme they use is to have a single drum winch, which launches the glider and a much smaller one which retrieve the cable. The two cables attach to 2 corners of a triangular piece of iron, another cable with the launching rings and parachute goes to the remaining corner. This system has been in use for at least 45 years, and is the most efficient way I've seen of getting launched. But it wouldn't work too well on an aerodrome site. I've not timed it, but it was VERY quick, much quicker than -- Mike Lindsay |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, but we were bungee launching the day we brought the SHK there, so
I didn't get to see the winch in action. Great for a ridgetop site. I suspect it could be adapted for a longer run also. Have also heard of HG sites with dual winches allowing those gliders to make 180 turns at each end. Frank Whiteley |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Mynd "triangle" is made of light alloy now, and there have been a series
of detail small improvements to the gear generally. No parachute is used when the retrieve winch is in use. The Mynd winchmaster (Colin Knox) has now built a new retrieve winch, so there are now two in use at the Mynd (not at the same time!). He has used an entirely different principle to engage drive when the retrieve starts. Of much more general interest, Skylaunch have built their second retrieve winch (the first is of course at the Mynd). They have demonstrated it at Lasham, and their Chief Flying Instructor has sent the following message to their Yahoo One List: "Following a successful midweek retrieve winch trial at Lasham a month ago we are planning to have a weekend trial and evaluation of the new system. The planned date for the trial is 10/11th September." I had always supposed that such a system could not work at an airfield such as Lasham, obviously I was completely wrong. W.J. (Bill) Dean (U.K.). Remove "ic" to reply. "Mike Lindsay" wrote in message ... In article .com, Frank Whiteley writes Single drum turn around time is similar to autotow. If you retrieve your rope at 15mph, it will take 5+minutes to get the rope back to the launch point on a 6000ft run and another minute to get the tow car back to the other end. Then the launch take up and launch you are talking 10 minute cycles or 6 launches per hour. If you're flying one Blanik, or 5-6 gliders in a small club, this is fine. With parafil, we ran 4-6 minute cycle times. Frank, have you ever been to the Midland GC site at the Long Mynd? The scheme they use is to have a single drum winch, which launches the glider and a much smaller one which retrieve the cable. The two cables attach to 2 corners of a triangular piece of iron, another cable with the launching rings and parachute goes to the remaining corner. This system has been in use for at least 45 years, and is the most efficient way I've seen of getting launched. But it wouldn't work too well on an aerodrome site. I've not timed it, but it was VERY quick, much quicker than Mike Lindsay |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Marc Ramsey" wrote in message news ![]() Many in the group fly in the western US, where summer density altitudes range up to 10,000 feet. Yes, the numbers I've run indicate that we need at least a 250 HP turbo diesel (not so much for the HP as the torque) to be able to launch something as mundane as a Grob 103 with two aboard. I'm curious about how these calculations work. At Hobbs, NM, elevation 3,700 feet and long runways, the 90 HP winch, using heavy wire, doesn't have any trouble at all with a Grob 103 loaded with two aboard. Makes me wonder what we are doing wrong. Larry Pardue 2I |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How long is your runway and what altitude do you achieve on launch?
Mike Schumann "Larry Pardue" wrote in message ... "Marc Ramsey" wrote in message news ![]() Many in the group fly in the western US, where summer density altitudes range up to 10,000 feet. Yes, the numbers I've run indicate that we need at least a 250 HP turbo diesel (not so much for the HP as the torque) to be able to launch something as mundane as a Grob 103 with two aboard. I'm curious about how these calculations work. At Hobbs, NM, elevation 3,700 feet and long runways, the 90 HP winch, using heavy wire, doesn't have any trouble at all with a Grob 103 loaded with two aboard. Makes me wonder what we are doing wrong. Larry Pardue 2I |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Schumann" wrote in message k.net... How long is your runway and what altitude do you achieve on launch? Mike Schumann As I said, long. From about 7,000 to 8,800. Typical altitudes on launch are around 1,500 to 2,000+ feet AGL. Larry Pardue 2I |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Pardue wrote:
"Marc Ramsey" wrote... Many in the group fly in the western US, where summer density altitudes range up to 10,000 feet. Yes, the numbers I've run indicate that we need at least a 250 HP turbo diesel (not so much for the HP as the torque) to be able to launch something as mundane as a Grob 103 with two aboard. I'm curious about how these calculations work. At Hobbs, NM, elevation 3,700 feet and long runways, the 90 HP winch, using heavy wire, doesn't have any trouble at all with a Grob 103 loaded with two aboard. Makes me wonder what we are doing wrong. It is purely a function of ones assumptions when performing the calculations. I'd like to launch a loaded Grob 103 at 8000 foot density altitude, no wind, to 2000 feet from a 5000 foot runway. My basic assumption was that to achieve optimal launch height for a given cable length, one needs to be able to pull hard enough to break the weak link at any point during the climb. I also assumed that there would be 20% mechanical losses. This establishes some relatively high minimum HP and torque levels. If I can I dig up the spreadsheet, I'll post the full set of numbers. None of this says that you can't launch a glider on less horsepower, it just says that you can't get very close to optimal height for a given length of the runway... Marc |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When I was at Halton 1993 and 1994 they used a retrieve winch at times
with a multi-drum winch (two drum). I don't recall exactly how they were working the two drums, but I do recall (from having driven it a few times) that operating the retrieve winch took some care in regard to timing when to engage it for the retrieve (which I seem to recall was done just after the glider released and before the cable reached the ground - therefore it used a parachute). It was quite easy to break the retrieve cable as I recall. Maybe someone who was there at Halton and more expert in its construction and use could pass on some details? Rgds, Derrick Steed |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots | paul k. sanchez | Piloting | 19 | September 27th 04 11:49 PM |
ANN: SoaringPilot 1.9.8 | Mark Hawkins | Soaring | 0 | April 21st 04 05:09 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |