![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Any comparison on energy content diesel v vegetable oil?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Montblack" wrote in message
... ("On-Condition" wrote) I didn't tell him I was planning on running discarded Chinese buffet "grease" through it. g Heat the grease with exhaust tubing - start and shut down with a small Jet-A tank. See, I've thought this all through. http://www.greasecar.com/index.cfm Check out the FAQs On Dutch television they showed a diesel truck that could switch from regular diesel to chicken fat, garbage from a chicken processing plant. The truck ran equally well on both types of 'fuel'... Can you imagine stuffing chicken waste in your diesel-powered plane? Two thoughts: 1. See, chickens *can* fly! 2. Finally a positive effect of a bird strike.. Rob |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 22:38:52 +0200, "Rob Turk"
wrote: On Dutch television they showed a diesel truck that could switch from regular diesel to chicken fat, garbage from a chicken processing plant. The truck ran equally well on both types of 'fuel'... Can you imagine stuffing chicken waste in your diesel-powered plane? 2. Finally a positive effect of a bird strike.. All you need is something like a Bussard ramscoop, and you can fly forever..... Ron "Or a Bustard Ramscoop" Wanttaja |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just imagine the entries to all the fly in's smelling like fried
chicken!!!! ![]() Patrick student SPL aircraft structural mech "Ron Wanttaja" wrote in message ... On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 22:38:52 +0200, "Rob Turk" wrote: On Dutch television they showed a diesel truck that could switch from regular diesel to chicken fat, garbage from a chicken processing plant. The truck ran equally well on both types of 'fuel'... Can you imagine stuffing chicken waste in your diesel-powered plane? 2. Finally a positive effect of a bird strike.. All you need is something like a Bussard ramscoop, and you can fly forever..... Ron "Or a Bustard Ramscoop" Wanttaja |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rob Turk wrote:
"Montblack" wrote in message ... ("On-Condition" wrote) I didn't tell him I was planning on running discarded Chinese buffet "grease" through it. g Heat the grease with exhaust tubing - start and shut down with a small Jet-A tank. See, I've thought this all through. http://www.greasecar.com/index.cfm Check out the FAQs On Dutch television they showed a diesel truck that could switch from regular diesel to chicken fat, garbage from a chicken processing plant. The truck ran equally well on both types of 'fuel'... Some buses in Halifax ran on fishing industry waste oils. For all I know that could be the whole fleet by now. What I like about diesel in airplanes is the possibility of low rpm power for sometimes double the range (at lower speeds). A radial will turn very smoothly at 1000 rpm and the diesel would be torquing near optimum just audible around 1400-1600 (?). |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Montblack wrote:
("On-Condition" wrote) BTW, weren't there some diesel radials in the early days of aviation? I've seen some photos I think. The high torque of diesel almost begs for that can't-keep-from-turning radial geometry. http://www.goldenwingsmuseum.com/Aircraft%20Pages/Stin-Det.html Golden Wings Museum 1928 Stinson Detroiter Packard Diesel http://home.earthlink.net/~ralphcooper/pimagh34.htm 2 lbs/hp, but that was then. I'm sure 1/1 could be had today (for air cooled). |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Zoche had displayed his radial Diesels at Oshkosh for some twenty
years.They were extremely smooth running two stroke turbocharged single or twin row configurations. Compact, light, and well designed. Zoche was most likely ahead of the market. See back issues of Sport Aviation. Don Black |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kyle Boatright" wrote And if you add up all the Sukhois, Murphy Mooses (not rebels), Thrushes, etc. it isn't a drop in the bucket. There isn't nearly enough volume there to make a radial diesel worthwhile for someone who wants to make money. I would think that the reason is not economics, but the suitability of a radial for diesel. You always see diesels using a very stout block, and very stout cranks and rods. Could a radial diesel be beefed up enough? I don't know, but I think the answer is no. GM tried to use a gas engine block converted to diesel, and it was a dismal failure. That even had a solid cast iron block, and stout crank, and that wasn't even up to the task. Individual jugs are weak, since they blow off even with gasoline pressures, sometimes. How much stronger would they have to be, for diesel? Could it be done using separate cylinders? A master rod may be strong enough, but I would think that the slave rods and pins would not be. They would have to be extremely beefed up to stand the pressures. I don't know if there would be enough room in the case to do it. Good questions raised here. Answers? -- Jim in NC |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
"Kyle Boatright" wrote And if you add up all the Sukhois, Murphy Mooses (not rebels), Thrushes, etc. it isn't a drop in the bucket. There isn't nearly enough volume there to make a radial diesel worthwhile for someone who wants to make money. I would think that the reason is not economics, but the suitability of a radial for diesel. You always see diesels using a very stout block, and very stout cranks and rods. Could a radial diesel be beefed up enough? I don't know, but I think the answer is no. GM tried to use a gas engine block converted to diesel, and it was a dismal failure. That even had a solid cast iron block, and stout crank, and that wasn't even up to the task. Individual jugs are weak, since they blow off even with gasoline pressures, sometimes. How much stronger would they have to be, for diesel? Could it be done using separate cylinders? Pressures during misfiring/backfiring are considerable also but don't bust the jugs. I'm no engine expert but think that jug failures are mostly O/H, fatique or casting related (?) and they sure do happen on opposed gas engines as well as radials. The difference is that a radial (at least one I saw) just kept on going. Most gas radials I've seen/flown had around 8:1 compression, that's food for thought. Just wondering though, are the german aircooled diesel cylinders intergral with the block? A master rod may be strong enough, but I would think that the slave rods and pins would not be. They would have to be extremely beefed up to stand the pressures. I don't know if there would be enough room in the case to do it. Good questions raised here. Answers? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "On-Condition" wrote Just wondering though, are the german aircooled diesel cylinders intergral with the block? I think they are bolt on, but in a dual assembly. Not positive. -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2-stroke diesel is the (near) future? | Max Kallio | Home Built | 134 | July 18th 05 12:39 AM |
2-stroke diesel is the (near) future? | Max Kallio | Rotorcraft | 123 | July 18th 05 12:39 AM |
Diesel Jodel information..........and .........diesel plane groups | Roland M | Home Built | 1 | January 4th 04 04:04 AM |
Diesel Jodel information..........and .........diesel plane groups | Roland M | General Aviation | 1 | January 4th 04 04:04 AM |
Diesel Jodel information..........and .........diesel plane groups | Roland M | Owning | 1 | January 4th 04 04:04 AM |