![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mr. Irwin I wouldn't worry about Larry in the least. We don't
"Plane Fun" wrote in message ups.com... Aircraft Spruce Many of your read the comments posted by "Larry" regarding "buying junk from Aircraft Spruce", and it is important that we state the facts in the situation. Larry purchased this Mitchell instruments some 8 months ago, and yesterday called to report that the instrument was defective and demanded his money back. The instruments is within its' year warranty so we offered to bring it back and have it repaired under warranty for him. Larry then proceeded to give our girl in Customer Service a large dose of profanity along with threats to blast our company to his news-group. He also spoke with Mitchell directly and verbally abused them as well, at which time they advised us tat they would not deal with him in any way. Our Customer Service manager, Carolyn Leon (who is wonderful with our customers and can solve any problem a customer may have) then called Larry to see what she can do. She was greeted with another long string of profanity and unreasonable demands, at which time she terminated the conversation. Aircraft Spruce will always do whatever we can to assist a customer, but my staff does not need to be abused. There was also come commentary about Aircraft Spruce substituting "mild steel" sheet in place of 4130 steel sheet, and that we were therefore "unscrupulous" people. Aircraft Spruce has an outstanding reputation for quality products over the past 40 years, and to suggest that we would intentionally substitute sub-standard material is insulting. The fact is that several sizes of 4130 sheet has not been available for Normalized (N) Condition in about a year, and these sizes are only available in Annealed (A) condition. Until these sizes are again produced by a mill in (N) condition, annealed material will be provided by ourselves and many other suppliers. We clearly state this in our current catalog and on our website. All the 4130 sheet we furnish is indeed 4130, and we have full test reports on file for anyone that needs them. I hope this information above clarifies these two issues for the newsgroup. If anyone would like further information or needs assistance please contact me directly at . Thanks to all of our valued customers for continued support. Jim Irwin President, Aircraft Spruce jls wrote: 1. If you buy something defective from ACS, watch out. That 1-year warranty on a Mitchell cylinder head temperature gauge is worthless as the teats on a boar hog. Run-around time today: 45 minutes wasted. Their customer service manager, Carolyn Lyon, in Atlanta will put you on hold and leave you there. 2. Their alternative trick is to send you to the manufacturer for handling the piece of junk you've paid good folding money for. But your purchase contract is not with the manufacturer; it's with Aircraft Spruce. 3. Buyer bewa Mitchell cylinder head temperature gauge. I spent an hour installing it to monitor one new Superior cylinder out of six and the needle wouldn't even rise off the peg. And yes, I've installed these before, quite a few of them. Some are good, some rotten. This one was rotten. 4. Buyer bewa buying something like this from Spruce if it is defective is like putting money down a rathole. They will squirm like the devil to get out of paying your money back. 5. If you're tempted to buy anything more complicated than nuts and bolts from Spruce, don't say you weren't warned when you get screwed. And by the way, at our chapter breakfast last Saturday, our chapter news editor, good friend, and A&P (who is building his 4th aircraft) announced that he recently ordered 4130 steel plate (that's chrome molybdenum steel alloy) from Aircraft Spruce as shown in their catalog, and instead received a crappy plate of soft carbon steel, with 60% of the bearing strength of chromoly. So don't just take it from me these are shady characters. Then another dissatisfied customer popped up at the table, then another ... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Plane Fun wrote...
I hope this information above clarifies these two issues for the newsgroup. .... Jim Irwin President, Aircraft Spruce It clarified one for me. But just to make sure, I tried to search Aircraft Spruce's website for their privacy policy. "Sorry. Nothing matched your search for PRIVACY. Please try a different search. You won't be getting any personal information, or cash, from me. Dave 'CAFB' Hyde |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Earlier, Dave Hyde wrote:
...It clarified one for me. But just to make sure, I tried to search Aircraft Spruce's website for their privacy policy... Interesting issue. I thought of that briefly, and then noted that Jim (Irwin) carefully put double-quotes around "Larry" in his reponse. I think that they'd only be breaching privacy if they use real names. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob K." wrote in message oups.com... Earlier, Dave Hyde wrote: ...It clarified one for me. But just to make sure, I tried to search Aircraft Spruce's website for their privacy policy... Interesting issue. I thought of that briefly, and then noted that Jim (Irwin) carefully put double-quotes around "Larry" in his reponse. I think that they'd only be breaching privacy if they use real names. If he were trying to protect privacy, why did he publish the names of innocent parties to another of his soured transactions several months ago right here in RAH? I know those two people. At least one of them despises Irwin. And is putting my real name in quotes supposed to protect my privacy? laughter |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:03:12 -0500, " jls"
wrote: "Bob K." wrote in message roups.com... Earlier, Dave Hyde wrote: ...It clarified one for me. But just to make sure, I tried to search Aircraft Spruce's website for their privacy policy... Interesting issue. I thought of that briefly, and then noted that Jim (Irwin) carefully put double-quotes around "Larry" in his reponse. I think that they'd only be breaching privacy if they use real names. If he were trying to protect privacy, why did he publish the names of innocent parties to another of his soured transactions several months ago right here in RAH? I know those two people. At least one of them despises Irwin. And is putting my real name in quotes supposed to protect my privacy? laughter Larry or JLS, whichever you prefer.... I'd probably be the last person to defend Aircraft Spruce BUT I find it rediculous that you think you can denigrate AS&S but they can't simply post the facts.... As far as your "privacy" is concerned.... you're the one that started this post about the 4130 and the Mitchell instruments. Irwin only came in to make a post stating "the other side of the argument". BTW, whatever happened "several months ago" has NO bearing on this situation. If you want to bring up issues from the past, well, Latchless Larry... you've got a LOT of history on this board and none of its flattering to you... John Ammeter |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wish to address the privacy issue. It appears that one or more people
feel that all of the transaction should be considered private and Aircraft Spruce breached this right of privacy when it disclosed conversations between a customer and Aircraft Spruce. There is neither a common law nor a statutory right of privacy regarding the conversations mentioned. Certain financial information is protected by federal and or state law. Similarly, most medical information is protected. By custom, it would probably be considered in bad taste to discredit a customer in public - unless that information is relevant to dispute harmful claims made by a customer. In essence, truth is a defense. For Aircraft Spruce, their reputation and integrity is their most valuable asset and they have every right to protect and defend it in a public forum. If that means making conversations with a customer public, after the customer has given a different story, then it is proper to do so. I am simply commenting on one of the issues raised. In regard to the matters alleged, the reader will have to decide for themselves. Colin N12HS --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.783 / Virus Database: 529 - Release Date: 10/25/04 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "COLIN LAMB" wrote in message ink.net... I wish to address the privacy issue. It appears that one or more people feel that all of the transaction should be considered private and Aircraft Spruce breached this right of privacy when it disclosed conversations between a customer and Aircraft Spruce. There is neither a common law nor a statutory right of privacy regarding the conversations mentioned. How would you know that unless you lived in California and practiced law there? So I'm assuming you are and you do, and you will make corrections if I'm wrong? Be that as it may, Jim Irwin doesn't give a damn about anybody's privacy, and in my case I don't mind anyway. I did mind that he divulged private information and addresses of two acquaintances several months ago right here in RAH, which also led others to comment on his sleaziness. Divulging the contents of my conversations with his gravel-voiced viragos, however, does present an issue with common law hearsay, which he uses with such abandon to prove the content of conversations he could not have even been a party to. In only one conversation, the first one with the first virago, did I use vulgar language (a felony for sure!) and not even then until after a series of insufferable provocations, the first of which was a razor wire barrier communication system imported from a third world country like Bangalore or Somalia; the second, being left on hold for almost an hour, and the third, being interrupted time and time again while I was trying to explain the reason for delay reporting that the junk Mitchell Cylinder Head Temperature Gauge was defective right out of the box . If you are talking to me and I keep cutting you off right in the middle of a sentence, I can expect you to color and tell me to GFY. So, in my book, Jim Irwin is a son of a bitch and his customer service is right out of hell. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jls wrote:
So, in my book, Jim Irwin is a son of a bitch and his customer service is right out of hell. I take it you've been there recently to know? :-) Matt |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I wish to address the privacy issue. It appears that one or more people feel that all of the transaction should be considered private and Aircraft Spruce breached this right of privacy when it disclosed conversations between a customer and Aircraft Spruce. There is neither a common law nor a statutory right of privacy regarding the conversations mentioned. Certain financial information is protected by federal and or state law. Similarly, most medical information is protected. By custom, it would probably be considered in bad taste to discredit a customer in public - unless that information is relevant to dispute harmful claims made by a customer. In essence, truth is a defense. For Aircraft Spruce, their reputation and integrity is their most valuable asset and they have every right to protect and defend it in a public forum. If that means making conversations with a customer public, after the customer has given a different story, then it is proper to do so. I am simply commenting on one of the issues raised. In regard to the matters alleged, the reader will have to decide for themselves. Colin N12HS You should have every right to respond in the same forum as was chosen by the accuser. Latchless picked the playing field and you responded in the most appropriate manner I can think of. Bob Reed www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site) KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress.... "Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!" (M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 03:13 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | December 2nd 04 07:00 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 02:31 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | September 2nd 04 05:15 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |