![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Natalie wrote:
Mike Spera wrote: As others have stated, you need to follow the engine manufacturer's instructions following a prop strike or "sudden engine stoppage". Usually this calls for inspection of the crank runout at a minimum. Some call for engine teardown "Some" includes both Lycoming and Continental. Ron, I thought they both had that requirement somewhere, but I was not sure whether it was binding (via some FAA reg.). Some other fellow posted the AD for one engine make because of the crank gear. That seems to suggest that the engine manufacturer's "recommendation" did not have regulatory weight (or the AD would be unnecessary). What's up? Thanks, Mike |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 02:36:36 GMT, Mike Spera
wrote: Ron Natalie wrote: Mike Spera wrote: As others have stated, you need to follow the engine manufacturer's instructions following a prop strike or "sudden engine stoppage". Usually this calls for inspection of the crank runout at a minimum. Some call for engine teardown "Some" includes both Lycoming and Continental. Ron, I thought they both had that requirement somewhere, but I was not sure whether it was binding (via some FAA reg.). Some other fellow posted the AD for one engine make because of the crank gear. That seems to suggest that the engine manufacturer's "recommendation" did not have regulatory weight (or the AD would be unnecessary). I don't have the papers here now, but it came out as an AD. *Any* prop strike that takes more than a *minor* dressing requires an engine teardown for both Lycoming and Continental and the engine does not need to be developing power, or even running when the strike happens. As to the original question: for most planes as long as the AD had been complied with there should be no change in price. Now if you had a nice new Bo, fresh off the assembly line which lost a quarter (or more) of it's value when you brought it home, that would be an animal of a different color. My engine is near run out. If I had to do a tear down after a strike it'd probably increase the value considerably. :-)) Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com What's up? Thanks, Mike |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Spera wrote:
Ron Natalie wrote: Mike Spera wrote: As others have stated, you need to follow the engine manufacturer's instructions following a prop strike or "sudden engine stoppage". Usually this calls for inspection of the crank runout at a minimum. Some call for engine teardown "Some" includes both Lycoming and Continental. Ron, I thought they both had that requirement somewhere, but I was not sure whether it was binding (via some FAA reg.). It's not an FAA requirement in most instances. It is however the manufacturers recommendation in all cases (like TBO). |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why does a prop ice up so apparently readily? | Mike Rapoport | Piloting | 2 | November 8th 05 02:52 PM |
my ignorance | LCT Paintball | Home Built | 25 | April 9th 05 06:54 PM |
Prop Strike Query | Dick | Home Built | 12 | November 16th 04 02:20 AM |
Prop Strike in Milwaukee | Ben Smith | Piloting | 9 | October 1st 04 11:21 PM |
IVO props... comments.. | Dave S | Home Built | 16 | December 6th 03 11:43 PM |