![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Macklin" wrote in news:l%
Tuf.40406$QW2.18045@dukeread08: See an aircraft mechanic who will ... install a legal anti-collision light (LED strobe uses the least power) fabricate a proper battery box for a battery, perhaps install a voltmeter, fabricate an electrical bus, circuit breaker and switch, perhaps an external power connection for charging, do the weight and balance and update the paperwork and aircraft logs. The airplane may have had an external wind-driven generator originally, you could restore that with a modern alternator at the cost of a 1 or 2 mph. But with a "modern alternator" you now have an engine driven electrical system, and all of the requirements that go along with it... (transponder within mode c veil). I would do the battery thing and/or investigate the wind generator. -- -- ET :-) "A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."---- Douglas Adams |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can drive the alternator with a propeller just like the
old generator, it just makes power with less drag. I'd use a self-exciting alternator that would not need to battery, that would make it fully redundant. A standard automotive alternator requires a battery to energize the rotor, the aircraft types used by Beech, have small magnets and will build a current as soon as they begin rotation and will have DC output even with the battery turned off. Not all aircraft manufacturers use such self-exciting alternators because they cost a little more. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "ET" wrote in message ... | "Jim Macklin" wrote in news:l% | Tuf.40406$QW2.18045@dukeread08: | | See an aircraft mechanic who will ... | install a legal anti-collision light (LED strobe uses the | least power) | fabricate a proper battery box for a battery, | perhaps install a voltmeter, | fabricate an electrical bus, circuit breaker and switch, | perhaps an external power connection for charging, | do the weight and balance and update the paperwork and | aircraft logs. | | The airplane may have had an external wind-driven generator | originally, you could restore that with a modern alternator | at the cost of a 1 or 2 mph. | | | | | But with a "modern alternator" you now have an engine driven electrical | system, and all of the requirements that go along with it... | (transponder within mode c veil). | | I would do the battery thing and/or investigate the wind generator. | | -- | -- ET :-) | | "A common mistake people make when trying to design something | completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete | fools."---- Douglas Adams |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Macklin" wrote You can drive the alternator with a propeller just like the old generator, it just makes power with less drag. You do need to use a special propeller, that is designed for converting thrust into power, instead of power into thrust. The more curved surface needs to be on the backside of the airstream, unlike a regular prop. For a generator, you can use a 12 volt motor with magnets in it, and a voltage regulator added to it. -- Jim in NC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
True, but a modern alternator will produce power at lower
rpm which means less drag. Also it should have lower frontal area and internal cooling drag. Alternators don't need heavy cast iron housings and w/o a commutator, should be electrically quieter. Ag planes often use a wind driven pump, so getting a proper prop isn't difficult, just tell the prop shop how many watts and what a/s, etc. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "Morgans" wrote in message ... | | "Jim Macklin" wrote | | You can drive the alternator with a propeller just like the | old generator, it just makes power with less drag. | | You do need to use a special propeller, that is designed for converting | thrust into power, instead of power into thrust. The more curved surface | needs to be on the backside of the airstream, unlike a regular prop. | | For a generator, you can use a 12 volt motor with magnets in it, and a | voltage regulator added to it. | -- | Jim in NC | | |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:zoXuf.40449$QW2.13845@dukeread08... You can drive the alternator with a propeller just like the old generator, it just makes power with less drag. Maybe you can, maybe you can't. This is a certificated airplane, not a homebuilt. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Field approval. No doubt there is an approved wind
generator from the 1940s. The conversion should be a simple matter, even on a certificated airplane. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message nk.net... | | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | news:zoXuf.40449$QW2.13845@dukeread08... | | You can drive the alternator with a propeller just like the | old generator, it just makes power with less drag. | | | Maybe you can, maybe you can't. This is a certificated airplane, not a | homebuilt. | | |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Crap, your right! When I had the Chief I used the transponder exemption
all the time. We used to fly around the SF Bay area (inside the mode C veil) since we were exempt. We could also fly around Sac Intl. I once landed a Champ at Sacramento Intl (class C) using the same transponder exemption (had to give 1 hr notice though). -Robert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ET" wrote in message ... "Jim Macklin" wrote in news:l% Tuf.40406$QW2.18045@dukeread08: See an aircraft mechanic who will ... install a legal anti-collision light (LED strobe uses the least power) fabricate a proper battery box for a battery, perhaps install a voltmeter, fabricate an electrical bus, circuit breaker and switch, perhaps an external power connection for charging, do the weight and balance and update the paperwork and aircraft logs. The airplane may have had an external wind-driven generator originally, you could restore that with a modern alternator at the cost of a 1 or 2 mph. But with a "modern alternator" you now have an engine driven electrical system, and all of the requirements that go along with it... (transponder within mode c veil). Nope, only required if the plane came from the _factory_ with an engine driven electrical system. I would do the battery thing and/or investigate the wind generator. -- -- ET :-) "A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."---- Douglas Adams |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No, "or which has not subsequently been certified with such a system
installed" 91.215(b) (3) Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(2) of this section, any aircraft which^M was not originally certificated with an engine-driven electrical system or^M which has not subsequently been certified with such a system installed,^M balloon or glider may conduct operations in the airspace within 30 nautical^M miles of an airport listed in appendix D, section 1 of this part provided^M such operations are conducted--^M |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... No, "or which has not subsequently been certified with such a system installed" 91.215(b) (3) Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(2) of this section, any aircraft which^M was not originally certificated with an engine-driven electrical system or^M which has not subsequently been certified with such a system installed,^M Added on after the fact is not "subsequently been certified with such a system." That is from the local FSDO. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FAA PPL night flight requirement - does it have to be DUAL? | Peter Clark | Piloting | 21 | January 6th 05 12:38 AM |
Night solo XC? | G. Burkhart | Piloting | 51 | October 14th 04 03:11 PM |
Night of the bombers - the most daring special mission of Finnishbombers in WW2 | Jukka O. Kauppinen | Military Aviation | 4 | March 22nd 04 11:19 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |