![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
TTaylor at cc.usu.edu wrote:
Paul, Can you explain the changes at Phoenix that will affect soaring for the rest of us? My understanding from flying at SLC and MSP is that we can still fly in the Mode C veil but clear of Class B. I have not looked at recent changes to see if I can fly over the top of the B, but at SLC we don't go that direction anyway. Tim My point is that without a National perspective, Changes anywhere in the National system may have effect on the rest of the country. I think that it is important to have some coordination and a focal point such as Cindy. Specifically, the proposed Phoenix redesign would have prevented operation within the Mode C veil from the ceiling of Class B or Class C airspace up to 10,000ft MSL. This would have effectively put a cap on operations both at Estrella and Turf of 9,000. The LOA that is being worked out will allow unlimited VFR Glider operations (without Transponders) within the Veil. Refer to FAR 91.215(b)(3)(ii) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A review of FAR91.215 does exempt gliders from transponder requirements
within the 30nm Mode C veil, but they have to operate clear of Class B airspace AND BELOW the top of Class B airspace to 10,000ft MSL which ever is LOWER. So if the Class B stops at 9,000MSL, then without a transponder, ANY AIRCRAFT, not just gliders, that are approved for operations within the Mode C veil without a transponder are capped at 9,000MSL and cannot continue climb to 10,000MSL which will get them out of the Mode C veil limitation and into the standard "above 10,000MSL" transponder or no transponder requirements. We face that same issue with the Las Vegas Class B, the glider club has a waiver with the FAA and local Tracon for specific climb windows to climb above 9,000MSL. It is only usable by members of the glider club who receive specific training in it's operation of the climb waiver. It is the same as going to Minden and operating in the Wave Windows, you need the training/approval of the signature to the waiver to be able to use the waiver. BT "TTaylor at cc.usu.edu" wrote in message oups.com... Paul, Can you explain the changes at Phoenix that will affect soaring for the rest of us? My understanding from flying at SLC and MSP is that we can still fly in the Mode C veil but clear of Class B. I have not looked at recent changes to see if I can fly over the top of the B, but at SLC we don't go that direction anyway. Tim |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't fly there, but if I understand this correctly (and
if I don't, I'd appreciate it if someone would tell me), the problem goes something like this: 91.215 allows transponderless glider flight inside a Mode C veil only at altitudes below the top of the Class B. If the top of the Class B is 10,000', then when the Feds "give back" Class B airspace by lowering the top to 9,000', the effect is to take away the airspace that transponderless aircraft use, while "giving back" airspace above the Class B (from 9,000 to 10K') to aircraft that have transponders. -- T o d d P a t t i s t - "WH" Ventus C (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) YES !! you are correct. BT |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aviation Weather Workshop Locations for 2006! | scottd | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | December 10th 05 01:47 AM |
USA / CFIG Recertification Clinic Schedule / 2006 / SSF | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | November 29th 05 04:55 PM |
Oshkosh Reflections | Jay Honeck | Owning | 44 | August 7th 05 02:31 PM |
Oshkosh Reflections | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 45 | August 7th 05 02:31 PM |
How I got to Oshkosh (long) | Doug | Owning | 2 | August 18th 03 12:05 AM |