![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blue Crew wrote:
...but what the exhausted, flabbergasted Captain Fraidy-Cat failed to clarify for the CFIG was that he was referring to the OPPOSITE leg, i.e., when he was in a right turn, say, he had the stick all the way to the LEFT, pressing on his left leg, and she still seems to be on the verge of rolling (banking) even further to the RIGHT. And THAT is what he was scared of. Trying to lift the right wing up by stick to the far left...turning to the right....the word spin comes to mind.....not holding off bank /daveb |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ahh yes, the joys of the wonderful 2-33; the apotheosis of American
glider design, the best trainer ever built, etc. choke puke.... Turn them all into hubcaps, I say! Seriously, those horrible things do more to damage the sport in the US than an army of lawyers. 66 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
kirk.stant wrote:
Ahh yes, the joys of the wonderful 2-33; ....... Seriously, those horrible things do more to damage the sport in the US than an army of lawyers. Except, of course, when you have the inside view of a glider crash. Then (and only then) that's the glider you want to be in. Tony V "6N" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Tony Verhulst wrote: kirk.stant wrote: Ahh yes, the joys of the wonderful 2-33; ....... Seriously, those horrible things do more to damage the sport in the US than an army of lawyers. Except, of course, when you have the inside view of a glider crash. Then (and only then) that's the glider you want to be in. Tony V "6N" My wife and I once had a pretty good out-and-return in a 2-33. It was an April day with a long dark cloudstreet stretching off to the horizon. We got to the base at 5000 agl to find it raining and snowing a bit, much of which seemed to find it's way into my station in the back seat. I flew out to the end of the cloudstreet (20+ miles). Being on the edge of serious hypothermia at that point, I let the wife fly the return leg while I huddled down with my frozen hands in my pockets. Trying to think of other things the 2-33 is good for... Oh, it's a great bomb drop ship. At Caesar Creek, my wife would fly and I'd carpet bomb the windsock target by shoving armloads of flour bombs out the back window. Rich Griffiths and Wayne Crist had rigged up a "sport canopy" on their privately owned 2-33. They'd make goggled, leather helmeted low altitude runs on the target with silk scarves flapping. Pulling up spectacularly from redline would get them a full 15 feet of extra altitude. Plenty to scrape it around for a landing. Ah, those were the days... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Weellll now---which would you rather do--fly a 2-33 or stay on the ground?
Last week I was at Moriarty, NM. After launching, I climbed briskly to 12,000 MSL, having spotted 2 distant gliders frolicking in a thermal, at a higher altitude. When I got close enough, I realized they were the ASC and Sundance 2-33's having fun! My first club had a 2-22, then got the 2-33 - the glider that got me "hooked"! I am now completely addicted. Yes, the controls take a bit of getting used to, and an understanding of basic aerodynamics. Yes it looks primitive. Yes, it is usually time-worn. Yes, I'd rather fly my current ship. But if it came down to a 2-33 or nothing---I'd take the 2-33 in a flash! -- Hartley Falbaum DG800B "KF" USA "kirk.stant" wrote in message oups.com... Ahh yes, the joys of the wonderful 2-33; the apotheosis of American glider design, the best trainer ever built, etc. choke puke.... Turn them all into hubcaps, I say! Seriously, those horrible things do more to damage the sport in the US than an army of lawyers. 66 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree...what the heck is wrong with a 2-33? I took 2 flights in one a
couple years ago when visiting Estrella in Arizona. It glides much better than my Corben Junior Ace! I thought it was a fine ship for what it was designed to do: train glider pilots! I didn't expect a 200:1 glide ratio ![]() daughter enjoyed her flight as well! Scott Bloomer, WI HL Falbaum wrote: Weellll now---which would you rather do--fly a 2-33 or stay on the ground? Last week I was at Moriarty, NM. After launching, I climbed briskly to 12,000 MSL, having spotted 2 distant gliders frolicking in a thermal, at a higher altitude. When I got close enough, I realized they were the ASC and Sundance 2-33's having fun! My first club had a 2-22, then got the 2-33 - the glider that got me "hooked"! I am now completely addicted. Yes, the controls take a bit of getting used to, and an understanding of basic aerodynamics. Yes it looks primitive. Yes, it is usually time-worn. Yes, I'd rather fly my current ship. But if it came down to a 2-33 or nothing---I'd take the 2-33 in a flash! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow - a glider who's main attractions a
1. it's great to crash in 2. It'll fit you if you are anorexic and/or 16 3. It'll make you appreciate "old school" aerodynamics and ergonomics 4. It's cheap, nasty, but available (wonder why?) If retro is your thing, then have at em and enjoy! And they are OK for rides (easy to get in and out of the front seat) and pumpkin drops (big opening side window in the back). But I think it is a shame to still be using 2-33s for training when there are so many better (and safer) alternatives. And I'm convinced that we lose a lot of new glider pilots after they get tired of wrestling the local club or FBO 2-33 around the sky for a few seasons. I guess the argument can be made that after a 2-33, any glider seems like glass - even a Blanik! And 500 hours in the darn things (mostly in the backseat, fortunately) hasn't done anything to change my opinion about them. 66 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What, you've never taken a foot off the rudder pedals so that you could lift
a leg and move the stick all the way to the fuselage wall? Don't stop when the stick hits your leg--raise your leg and give her more aileron. I thought that's what flying a 2-33 on a hot summer day was all about. "Blue Crew" wrote in message ups.com... An actual conversation that quite recently took place ten thousand feet over the California desert between Captain Fraidy-Cat (CFC) and a rather happy-go-lucky glider CFI (CFIG): CFC: NO!! PLEASE! I'M SCARED!!! CFIG: What are you scared of? CFC: I DON'T KNOW!! CFIG: Then you can't be scared. You have to at least be scared of something. Keep your turn going. CFC: I'M SCARED THAT SHE'S GONNA INVERT!! CFIG: She won't. Keep your turn going. CFC: WHEN I MAKE A TURN, THE STICK IS ALL THE WAY AGAINST MY LEG AND IT WON'T GO ANY FURTHER!! ...but what the exhausted, flabbergasted Captain Fraidy-Cat failed to clarify for the CFIG was that he was referring to the OPPOSITE leg, i.e., when he was in a right turn, say, he had the stick all the way to the LEFT, pressing on his left leg, and she still seems to be on the verge of rolling (banking) even further to the RIGHT. And THAT is what he was scared of. So now we're all back on the ground in the city, all rested up and thinking more clearly, and the question is posed to you courageous gentlemen on this news group: Could the glider continue rolling with hard opposite aileron? Would opposite rudder (left in the above example) help? Type is: Schweitzer SGS 2-33. P.S. If that thing had a decent piece of yarn for a yaw string instead of that worn-out, raggedy, one-inch stub, this conversation might not have taken place as such. CFC had to fly her by feel, something usually reserved for more experienced glider pilots. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ah, well. The 2-33 was designed back when Americans
were still pretty.* *Avg male weight 170lbs; avg. female 125. At 20:54 12 July 2006, Kirk.Stant wrote: Wow - a glider who's main attractions a 1. it's great to crash in 2. It'll fit you if you are anorexic and/or 16 3. It'll make you appreciate 'old school' aerodynamics and ergonomics 4. It's cheap, nasty, but available (wonder why?) If retro is your thing, then have at em and enjoy! And they are OK for rides (easy to get in and out of the front seat) and pumpkin drops (big opening side window in the back). But I think it is a shame to still be using 2-33s for training when there are so many better (and safer) alternatives. And I'm convinced that we lose a lot of new glider pilots after they get tired of wrestling the local club or FBO 2-33 around the sky for a few seasons. I guess the argument can be made that after a 2-33, any glider seems like glass - even a Blanik! And 500 hours in the darn things (mostly in the backseat, fortunately) hasn't done anything to change my opinion about them. 66 |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
From the Jim Campbell, Captain Zoom archives (all of 6 years ago) | Mick | Home Built | 49 | February 3rd 06 03:27 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
A Sea Story (OT and long) | Mike Kanze | Naval Aviation | 4 | March 14th 05 03:51 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |