![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bret Ludwig wrote: wrote: Lou wrote: If your going to rebuild anyway, take a look at these. http://www.airboattrader.com/PartsForSale.htm OK, if you're not going to buy a certiifed engine, then what are the pros and cons of buying an airboat engine vs a VW or Corvair conversion? One, the airboaters are getting rid of the LyCon aircraft engines in droves. That should tell you something. Two, VWs are too small to be used as a direct drive airboat plant. A direct drive VW is good only for motorgliders, drones, and the very minimal single seat aircraft. Geared (or belted) VWs might be okay but none are ever seen. Corvairs are proving crank breakers when operated (direct drive) at power levels much over that of the old Pietenpol conversions. The stock VW cranks break too. 'Conversion' implies modification which, at a minimum for VW and Corvair engines would include replacing the crank. That doesn't address any other problems. In my opinion there are only two ways to fly unless you have warbird money: a certified aircraft engine in a certified airframe or a homebuilt with an en-bloc-construction, liquid cooled general purpose engine with belt or gear reduction. VWs, two strokes and the like are just not powerful or dependable enough, noncertified "aircraft" designs like the Jabiru are a worst of both worlds and vastly overpriced scam, and LyCon aircraft engines are overpriced museum pieces if you don't need a certificated engine. Intersting, are there many en-bloc-construction, liquid cooled general purpose engine powered homebuilts flying? (Aircampers for one, right?). -- FF |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Simple, More runout means that the crankshaft is bent more. Bent
more means it is more likely to be cracked and the prop fly off some day. On 6 Aug 2006 16:53:15 -0700, " wrote: http://www.whiteindustries.com/ White Industries lists engines with flange runout. What does flange runout tell about the engine? It seems some prop strike engines have a larger flange runout reading than others, and the larger the flange runout, the lower the price. Why? Thanks. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Then you need to tear it down.????
If its a lycoming you need to tear it down regardless..... AD NOTE joe Michelle P wrote: wrote: http://www.whiteindustries.com/ White Industries lists engines with flange runout. What does flange runout tell about the engine? It seems some prop strike engines have a larger flange runout reading than others, and the larger the flange runout, the lower the price. Why? Thanks. The run out will tell you how badly the flange is bent. Thats it. In order to tell how much damaged there was you need to know several things: What was the power setting when the engine had it's strike?, What kind of prop?, What did it hit? Was it a sudden stop or a slow down? Then you need to tear it down. Throw away the crank. have the case throughly inspected, have all of the other moving parts throughly inspected. Personally I would only buy one as a core exchange if the manufacturer will take it. Michelle |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
joe wrote:
Then you need to tear it down.???? If its a lycoming you need to tear it down regardless..... AD NOTE joe It's only a service bulletin, not an AD. Both Continental and Lycoming consider a teardown mandatory after a prop strike. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
no there is an AD note 2004 -10-14 i think that requires it
A few years back lycoming redefined what is a prop strike..... A manufactururer SB does not make anything mandatory for a part 91 operator. An AD note does....... Ron Natalie wrote: joe wrote: Then you need to tear it down.???? If its a lycoming you need to tear it down regardless..... AD NOTE joe It's only a service bulletin, not an AD. Both Continental and Lycoming consider a teardown mandatory after a prop strike. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
joe wrote:
no there is an AD note 2004 -10-14 i think that requires it A few years back lycoming redefined what is a prop strike..... A manufactururer SB does not make anything mandatory for a part 91 operator. An AD note does....... Ron Natalie wrote: joe wrote: Then you need to tear it down.???? If its a lycoming you need to tear it down regardless..... AD NOTE joe It's only a service bulletin, not an AD. Both Continental and Lycoming consider a teardown mandatory after a prop strike. Read the Lycoming AD/SB carefully. Just because you hit something does not mean you have to do a tear down. Michelle A&P (having read the thing more than once in the last year) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8 Aug 2006 18:04:34 -0700, "joe" wrote:
no there is an AD note 2004 -10-14 i think that requires it A few years back lycoming redefined what is a prop strike..... A manufactururer SB does not make anything mandatory for a part 91 operator. An AD note does....... Even if it were only and SB which is not "officially" mandatory, let's say you have a prop strike. Every thing looks good, you replace or straighten the prop and the thing runs well. Even the run out looks good. About 50 or 100 hours later the crank lets go and you shred the thing in an off field landing although no one gets hurt. What does your insurance company say if they find out you have not complied with that particular SB? Will they pay and say nothing? Will they pay and complain? Will they raise your rates? Will they let your renew at renewal time? Who knows? Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com Ron Natalie wrote: joe wrote: Then you need to tear it down.???? If its a lycoming you need to tear it down regardless..... AD NOTE joe It's only a service bulletin, not an AD. Both Continental and Lycoming consider a teardown mandatory after a prop strike. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Buying prop strike engine | [email protected] | Owning | 18 | August 14th 06 12:47 AM |
Engine Balancing and Resonance Vibration Problem | AllanFuller | Owning | 13 | September 12th 05 12:51 AM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Towing | Roger Fowler | Soaring | 6 | August 11th 05 04:25 AM |
Prop Feathers and Engine Shuts down after landing???????? | AIR ADVENTURE82 | Piloting | 3 | August 21st 03 05:42 AM |