A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Skylune (or family relation) takes to the water...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old August 25th 06, 11:28 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,374
Default Skylune (or family relation) takes to the water...

In article . com,
"cjcampbell" wrote:

The following are all years in which the traffic fatalities were over
50,000
(not all years between 1966-1976 where in the 2004 report)

1966
1970
1978-1980

But the 43440 in 2005 is the highest since 1990.

(source www.nhtsa.dot.gov)


Funny how the highest traffic fatality rates were during the years of
the 55mph speed limit.


The numbers given were total fatalities, not rates.

The TSF2004.pdf available somewhere on www.nhtsa.dot.gov (I don't
remember where) shows the fatality RATE pretty much decreasing each year
since 1966. As with any statistic it is essential to ask why. Possible
explanations include (1) improved vehicle safety, (2) improved road safety
(e.g., better guard rails), and (3) medical improvements.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #12  
Old August 25th 06, 11:50 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
cjcampbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 191
Default Skylune (or family relation) takes to the water...


Bob Noel wrote:
In article . com,
"cjcampbell" wrote:

The following are all years in which the traffic fatalities were over
50,000
(not all years between 1966-1976 where in the 2004 report)

1966
1970
1978-1980

But the 43440 in 2005 is the highest since 1990.

(source www.nhtsa.dot.gov)


Funny how the highest traffic fatality rates were during the years of
the 55mph speed limit.


The numbers given were total fatalities, not rates.

The TSF2004.pdf available somewhere on www.nhtsa.dot.gov (I don't
remember where) shows the fatality RATE pretty much decreasing each year
since 1966. As with any statistic it is essential to ask why. Possible
explanations include (1) improved vehicle safety, (2) improved road safety
(e.g., better guard rails), and (3) medical improvements.


I remember reading in the Wall Street Journal that better tires
accounted for more than half of it.

  #13  
Old August 25th 06, 12:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
B A R R Y[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 178
Default Skylune (or family relation) takes to the water...

Kyle Boatright wrote:

What kind of nut swerves in front of an aircraft?


I'm local and familiar with that lake. It's a relatively quiet lake,
with an engine limit for boats to keep speed and noise down. Some
reports stated that the man had to be subdued by police, so I wonder if
alcohol was a factor.
  #14  
Old August 25th 06, 12:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 85
Default Skylune (or family relation) takes to the water...


Funny how the highest traffic fatality rates were during the years of
the 55mph speed limit.


No supprise, people fall asleep with speeds like that. ;-)

-Kees.

  #15  
Old August 25th 06, 01:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,573
Default Skylune (or family relation) takes to the water...

I remember reading in the Wall Street Journal that better tires
accounted for more than half of it.


Tires are but one area that have vastly improved since the 1960s.

Cars in general are SO much better now. I remember my Dad trading his
Pontiacs at 50,000 miles, because they were about run out. People who
got 100,000 miles were in the local paper.

Now, I've got over 100K miles on 2 out of our 4 vehicles -- and I
barely drive the other two, so they'll likely last forever.

Driver's education is another area that is radically improved. In the
1960s, the majority of drivers had received NO instruction at all. My
son just went through it and received his license two weeks ago, and it
was WORK to earn that piece of paper, for both he and us.

Drunk driving laws -- something that barely existed until the '80s --
are now strictly enforced. This reduces fatalities dramatically.

There are some downsides, however. Traffic engineers have gone off the
deep end to ensure safety, often (IMHO) at the expense of common sense
and efficiency. In my neck of the woods, for example, traffic is
deliberately engineered to stop often, so that people can't drive too
fast. Worse, NO ONE is allowed to turn left at stop lights anymore,
without a specific, dedicated green arrow. We are no longer trusted to
determine whether it's safe to turn or not, regardless of oncoming
traffic -- or the lack thereof.

The fuel wasted due to these two measures alone is astronomical.
Hopefully the pendulum will swing back, and these types of "safety"
measures will be adjusted -- but I'm not holding my breath.

BTW: I thank Congress DAILY for raising freeway speed limits back to
70 mph. There was nothing sillier than driving slowly on a 6-lane
autobahn!
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

  #16  
Old August 25th 06, 02:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 603
Default Skylune (or family relation) takes to the water...


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
oups.com...
I remember reading in the Wall Street Journal that better tires
accounted for more than half of it.


Tires are but one area that have vastly improved since the 1960s.


Disc brakes versus drum.
Rack & pinion steering versus ball joint
MacPherson struts versus old style shocks
Better lights especially tail lights.

And of course, shoulder belts and air bags.

One thing that many don't realize is the highways are better engineered
including materials and breakaway barriers.

OTOH, city traffic engineering is MUCH WORSE and in many cases borders on
voluntary manslughter.


....
Driver's education is another area that is radically improved. In the
1960s, the majority of drivers had received NO instruction at all. My
son just went through it and received his license two weeks ago, and it
was WORK to earn that piece of paper, for both he and us.


Many states will not issue a license to a driver under 18 unless they've
passed a DE class.

Drunk driving laws -- something that barely existed until the '80s --
are now strictly enforced. This reduces fatalities dramatically.


DUI enforcement has been falling for years except around holidays.

There are some downsides, however. Traffic engineers have gone off the
deep end to ensure safety, often (IMHO) at the expense of common sense
and efficiency. In my neck of the woods, for example, traffic is
deliberately engineered to stop often, so that people can't drive too
fast.


Hate to tell you this, Jay, but that's a myth -- much better is
synchronizing the lights right at the speed limit. If you find traffic
stopping all the time, it's because it leads to a lot more red light running
(ie, LOTSA $$$).

That's why the overwhelming majority of cities that installed red light
cameras also shortened yellow lights from an average of 7.5 seconds prior to
the cameras, to 3.5-4.0 seconds after. Also, light sync changed from 0-3.5
MPH under the limit to 10 or more MPH _OVER_.

Worse, NO ONE is allowed to turn left at stop lights anymore,
without a specific, dedicated green arrow. We are no longer trusted to
determine whether it's safe to turn or not, regardless of oncoming
traffic -- or the lack thereof.

The fuel wasted due to these two measures alone is astronomical.


Well over a billion barrels a year

Hopefully the pendulum will swing back, and these types of "safety"
measures will be adjusted -- but I'm not holding my breath.

BTW: I thank Congress DAILY for raising freeway speed limits back to
70 mph. There was nothing sillier than driving slowly on a 6-lane
autobahn!


Congress didn't raise them, they removed the 55 FEDERAL limit (remember?).
Out west, 75MPH is common.




  #17  
Old August 25th 06, 02:31 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 603
Default Skylune (or family relation) takes to the water...


wrote in message
ups.com...

Funny how the highest traffic fatality rates were during the years of
the 55mph speed limit.


No supprise, people fall asleep with speeds like that. ;-)


No " ;-) " needed; the history is well founded and documented.



  #18  
Old August 25th 06, 02:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 603
Default Skylune (or family relation) takes to the water...


"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message
news
In article ,
Jim Logajan wrote:

"Floatplane Incident Results In Arrest
August 21, 2006
By CAROLYN MOREAU, Courant Staff Writer

MORRIS -- A local boater who repeatedly swerved in front of a floatplane
on
Bantam Lake to prevent it from taking off was arrested on a warrant
Sunday,
authorities said."

Remainder of story can be found he

http://www.courant.com/news/local/hc...923730.story?c
oll=hc-headlines-local

Could this be a relative of this group's "skylune"? ;-)



Does the sentence, "You in a whole heap o' trouble there, boy!" mean
anything to the boater, Mr. Edward Kurtz?

Resisting arrest, too! A *whole* heap o' trouble!


Yeah, right! Probation and Community Service, maybe court costs.



  #19  
Old August 25th 06, 02:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 660
Default Skylune (or family relation) takes to the water...


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
oups.com...

BTW: I thank Congress DAILY for raising freeway speed limits back to
70 mph. There was nothing sillier than driving slowly on a 6-lane
autobahn!


Congress didn't raise freeway speed limits back to 70 mph. They just
repealed the national speed limit, which should never have been passed to
begin with. The states were then free to set speed limits within their
states.


  #20  
Old August 25th 06, 03:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,446
Default Skylune (or family relation) takes to the water...

In article .net,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
oups.com...

BTW: I thank Congress DAILY for raising freeway speed limits back to
70 mph. There was nothing sillier than driving slowly on a 6-lane
autobahn!


Congress didn't raise freeway speed limits back to 70 mph. They just
repealed the national speed limit, which should never have been passed to
begin with. The states were then free to set speed limits within their
states.


Sadly, Ohio is still 55 trucks, 65 autos.... sigh!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Water in our oil, or just alot of hot air? [email protected] Piloting 9 April 24th 06 05:30 AM
New Orleans: Fly low and slow over Convention Center to air drop? Darrel Toepfer Piloting 59 September 15th 05 04:34 PM
flying into snow showers without deice Doug Carter Instrument Flight Rules 35 February 7th 05 11:19 AM
God Honest Naval Aviation 2 July 24th 03 04:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.