![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
"cjcampbell" wrote: The following are all years in which the traffic fatalities were over 50,000 (not all years between 1966-1976 where in the 2004 report) 1966 1970 1978-1980 But the 43440 in 2005 is the highest since 1990. (source www.nhtsa.dot.gov) Funny how the highest traffic fatality rates were during the years of the 55mph speed limit. The numbers given were total fatalities, not rates. The TSF2004.pdf available somewhere on www.nhtsa.dot.gov (I don't remember where) shows the fatality RATE pretty much decreasing each year since 1966. As with any statistic it is essential to ask why. Possible explanations include (1) improved vehicle safety, (2) improved road safety (e.g., better guard rails), and (3) medical improvements. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bob Noel wrote: In article . com, "cjcampbell" wrote: The following are all years in which the traffic fatalities were over 50,000 (not all years between 1966-1976 where in the 2004 report) 1966 1970 1978-1980 But the 43440 in 2005 is the highest since 1990. (source www.nhtsa.dot.gov) Funny how the highest traffic fatality rates were during the years of the 55mph speed limit. The numbers given were total fatalities, not rates. The TSF2004.pdf available somewhere on www.nhtsa.dot.gov (I don't remember where) shows the fatality RATE pretty much decreasing each year since 1966. As with any statistic it is essential to ask why. Possible explanations include (1) improved vehicle safety, (2) improved road safety (e.g., better guard rails), and (3) medical improvements. I remember reading in the Wall Street Journal that better tires accounted for more than half of it. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kyle Boatright wrote:
What kind of nut swerves in front of an aircraft? I'm local and familiar with that lake. It's a relatively quiet lake, with an engine limit for boats to keep speed and noise down. Some reports stated that the man had to be subdued by police, so I wonder if alcohol was a factor. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Funny how the highest traffic fatality rates were during the years of the 55mph speed limit. No supprise, people fall asleep with speeds like that. ;-) -Kees. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I remember reading in the Wall Street Journal that better tires
accounted for more than half of it. Tires are but one area that have vastly improved since the 1960s. Cars in general are SO much better now. I remember my Dad trading his Pontiacs at 50,000 miles, because they were about run out. People who got 100,000 miles were in the local paper. Now, I've got over 100K miles on 2 out of our 4 vehicles -- and I barely drive the other two, so they'll likely last forever. Driver's education is another area that is radically improved. In the 1960s, the majority of drivers had received NO instruction at all. My son just went through it and received his license two weeks ago, and it was WORK to earn that piece of paper, for both he and us. Drunk driving laws -- something that barely existed until the '80s -- are now strictly enforced. This reduces fatalities dramatically. There are some downsides, however. Traffic engineers have gone off the deep end to ensure safety, often (IMHO) at the expense of common sense and efficiency. In my neck of the woods, for example, traffic is deliberately engineered to stop often, so that people can't drive too fast. Worse, NO ONE is allowed to turn left at stop lights anymore, without a specific, dedicated green arrow. We are no longer trusted to determine whether it's safe to turn or not, regardless of oncoming traffic -- or the lack thereof. The fuel wasted due to these two measures alone is astronomical. Hopefully the pendulum will swing back, and these types of "safety" measures will be adjusted -- but I'm not holding my breath. BTW: I thank Congress DAILY for raising freeway speed limits back to 70 mph. There was nothing sillier than driving slowly on a 6-lane autobahn! -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message oups.com... I remember reading in the Wall Street Journal that better tires accounted for more than half of it. Tires are but one area that have vastly improved since the 1960s. Disc brakes versus drum. Rack & pinion steering versus ball joint MacPherson struts versus old style shocks Better lights especially tail lights. And of course, shoulder belts and air bags. One thing that many don't realize is the highways are better engineered including materials and breakaway barriers. OTOH, city traffic engineering is MUCH WORSE and in many cases borders on voluntary manslughter. .... Driver's education is another area that is radically improved. In the 1960s, the majority of drivers had received NO instruction at all. My son just went through it and received his license two weeks ago, and it was WORK to earn that piece of paper, for both he and us. Many states will not issue a license to a driver under 18 unless they've passed a DE class. Drunk driving laws -- something that barely existed until the '80s -- are now strictly enforced. This reduces fatalities dramatically. DUI enforcement has been falling for years except around holidays. There are some downsides, however. Traffic engineers have gone off the deep end to ensure safety, often (IMHO) at the expense of common sense and efficiency. In my neck of the woods, for example, traffic is deliberately engineered to stop often, so that people can't drive too fast. Hate to tell you this, Jay, but that's a myth -- much better is synchronizing the lights right at the speed limit. If you find traffic stopping all the time, it's because it leads to a lot more red light running (ie, LOTSA $$$). That's why the overwhelming majority of cities that installed red light cameras also shortened yellow lights from an average of 7.5 seconds prior to the cameras, to 3.5-4.0 seconds after. Also, light sync changed from 0-3.5 MPH under the limit to 10 or more MPH _OVER_. Worse, NO ONE is allowed to turn left at stop lights anymore, without a specific, dedicated green arrow. We are no longer trusted to determine whether it's safe to turn or not, regardless of oncoming traffic -- or the lack thereof. The fuel wasted due to these two measures alone is astronomical. Well over a billion barrels a year Hopefully the pendulum will swing back, and these types of "safety" measures will be adjusted -- but I'm not holding my breath. BTW: I thank Congress DAILY for raising freeway speed limits back to 70 mph. There was nothing sillier than driving slowly on a 6-lane autobahn! Congress didn't raise them, they removed the 55 FEDERAL limit (remember?). Out west, 75MPH is common. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... Funny how the highest traffic fatality rates were during the years of the 55mph speed limit. No supprise, people fall asleep with speeds like that. ;-) No " ;-) " needed; the history is well founded and documented. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message news ![]() In article , Jim Logajan wrote: "Floatplane Incident Results In Arrest August 21, 2006 By CAROLYN MOREAU, Courant Staff Writer MORRIS -- A local boater who repeatedly swerved in front of a floatplane on Bantam Lake to prevent it from taking off was arrested on a warrant Sunday, authorities said." Remainder of story can be found he http://www.courant.com/news/local/hc...923730.story?c oll=hc-headlines-local Could this be a relative of this group's "skylune"? ;-) Does the sentence, "You in a whole heap o' trouble there, boy!" mean anything to the boater, Mr. Edward Kurtz? Resisting arrest, too! A *whole* heap o' trouble! Yeah, right! Probation and Community Service, maybe court costs. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message oups.com... BTW: I thank Congress DAILY for raising freeway speed limits back to 70 mph. There was nothing sillier than driving slowly on a 6-lane autobahn! Congress didn't raise freeway speed limits back to 70 mph. They just repealed the national speed limit, which should never have been passed to begin with. The states were then free to set speed limits within their states. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .net,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: "Jay Honeck" wrote in message oups.com... BTW: I thank Congress DAILY for raising freeway speed limits back to 70 mph. There was nothing sillier than driving slowly on a 6-lane autobahn! Congress didn't raise freeway speed limits back to 70 mph. They just repealed the national speed limit, which should never have been passed to begin with. The states were then free to set speed limits within their states. Sadly, Ohio is still 55 trucks, 65 autos.... sigh! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Water in our oil, or just alot of hot air? | [email protected] | Piloting | 9 | April 24th 06 05:30 AM |
New Orleans: Fly low and slow over Convention Center to air drop? | Darrel Toepfer | Piloting | 59 | September 15th 05 04:34 PM |
flying into snow showers without deice | Doug Carter | Instrument Flight Rules | 35 | February 7th 05 11:19 AM |
God Honest | Naval Aviation | 2 | July 24th 03 04:45 AM |