![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's an option, not a futures contract.
wrote in message ups.com... Jim Burns wrote: Kind of like the stock market, all on emotion. I agree. In theory, if you get "caught" owning a futures contract when it closes, you can be forced to take delivery of the actual product. You can also be forced to deliver the actual product. That is not true. Here is an example of what a future is: Suppose you and I were neighbors. You pay me $3 if I agree to pay you the price posted at the local gas station for regular at 9 AM tomorrow. A future is nothing more than a bet on the future price in the spot market. If futures traders were forced to own facilities to accommodate delivery of the underlying product, or forced to own the product before selling a futures contract, there would be a LOT less speculation. Jim |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry, back up.... I misread your answer...
You're correct... but say I pay you $3 per gallon for a September contract that climbs to $4 before it settles and goes off the board. I now own $3 gas but the market is $4 and you owe me either the gas or the price of the contract on the contract due date. I may want the gas and you will have the obligation to deliver it to the contract location. My point is that if neither of us have the facilities to handle the fuel, neither of us should be in the fuel business. Jim "Jim Burns" wrote in message ... That's an option, not a futures contract. wrote in message ups.com... Jim Burns wrote: Kind of like the stock market, all on emotion. I agree. In theory, if you get "caught" owning a futures contract when it closes, you can be forced to take delivery of the actual product. You can also be forced to deliver the actual product. That is not true. Here is an example of what a future is: Suppose you and I were neighbors. You pay me $3 if I agree to pay you the price posted at the local gas station for regular at 9 AM tomorrow. A future is nothing more than a bet on the future price in the spot market. If futures traders were forced to own facilities to accommodate delivery of the underlying product, or forced to own the product before selling a futures contract, there would be a LOT less speculation. Jim |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Dylan Smith" wrote)
What's the fuel for cars called in the US? This is all rather addling... By the normal populace, 'gas', which is short for 'gasoline'. By the aviation community, car fuel is called 'mogas'. 'mogas' = motor gas For car drivers, in the USA: * They're called gas stations, or filling stations. * When filling up our cars, we say "the gas pump." * (Sometimes the term fuel pumps is used - mostly by truckers and at industrial sites) * Fuel pumps are the hardware inside the car's gas tanks. * The red, portable, 5 gallon plastic container is called a gas can. * Cars have gas caps. * We call it gas mileage or fuel mileage = mpg Montblack |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jim Burns wrote: Sorry, back up.... I misread your answer... You're correct... but say I pay you $3 per gallon for a September contract that climbs to $4 before it settles and goes off the board. I now own $3 gas but the market is $4 and you owe me either the gas or the price of the contract on the contract due date. I may want the gas and you will have the obligation to deliver it to the contract location. Not true. A future is just a bet on the price as I described. It is the case that the payment may be made in kind if both parties agree. But there is not obligation make an in kind transaction on either party. A consumer buys futures to insure a particular price, not actual delivery of oil. They have to buy oil directly or indirectly from the spot market. My point is that if neither of us have the facilities to handle the fuel, neither of us should be in the fuel business. Jim "Jim Burns" wrote in message ... That's an option, not a futures contract. wrote in message ups.com... Jim Burns wrote: Kind of like the stock market, all on emotion. I agree. In theory, if you get "caught" owning a futures contract when it closes, you can be forced to take delivery of the actual product. You can also be forced to deliver the actual product. That is not true. Here is an example of what a future is: Suppose you and I were neighbors. You pay me $3 if I agree to pay you the price posted at the local gas station for regular at 9 AM tomorrow. A future is nothing more than a bet on the future price in the spot market. If futures traders were forced to own facilities to accommodate delivery of the underlying product, or forced to own the product before selling a futures contract, there would be a LOT less speculation. Jim |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the vast majority of situations delivery never takes place and people do
not buy the product using futures. However, I'll throw three instances at you that I have direct experience with using futures to both market an actual crop and purchase actual commodities. Selling corn by committing to a futures contract through a commodity broker delivered to a terminal on a specific date. Buying fertilizers, mostly nitrogens, sometimes phosphates, through a dealer who purchases a futures contract on our behalf with a demand delivery notification at a certain date. Buying liquid propane, again through a dealer, who purchases a futures contract through a broker with demand delivery for specified dates. The fuel dealers that have adequate storage will also do the same. Usually you have to commit to 5 semi loads, but they will buy a contract for you, demand delivery, then inventory the fuel. You pay the contract price, plus brokerage, plus storage. The larger dairy farms nearby also purchase corn in this manner. You're absolutely correct about using futures to lock in the price at a certain date, however we use it to guarantee delivery at that price when many of the wholesalers will not step in an guarantee price or availability, or may not have storage available when we need product. Jim wrote in message oups.com... Jim Burns wrote: Sorry, back up.... I misread your answer... You're correct... but say I pay you $3 per gallon for a September contract that climbs to $4 before it settles and goes off the board. I now own $3 gas but the market is $4 and you owe me either the gas or the price of the contract on the contract due date. I may want the gas and you will have the obligation to deliver it to the contract location. Not true. A future is just a bet on the price as I described. It is the case that the payment may be made in kind if both parties agree. But there is not obligation make an in kind transaction on either party. A consumer buys futures to insure a particular price, not actual delivery of oil. They have to buy oil directly or indirectly from the spot market. My point is that if neither of us have the facilities to handle the fuel, neither of us should be in the fuel business. Jim "Jim Burns" wrote in message ... That's an option, not a futures contract. wrote in message ups.com... Jim Burns wrote: Kind of like the stock market, all on emotion. I agree. In theory, if you get "caught" owning a futures contract when it closes, you can be forced to take delivery of the actual product. You can also be forced to deliver the actual product. That is not true. Here is an example of what a future is: Suppose you and I were neighbors. You pay me $3 if I agree to pay you the price posted at the local gas station for regular at 9 AM tomorrow. A future is nothing more than a bet on the future price in the spot market. If futures traders were forced to own facilities to accommodate delivery of the underlying product, or forced to own the product before selling a futures contract, there would be a LOT less speculation. Jim |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Jim Burns" wrote)
Two weeks ago, the very day of the London terror threat announcement, September Unleaded gas futures dropped 18 cents per gallon so I jumped and bought 2 semi loads. I paid $2.789 which includes all of the fed and state taxes. Yesterday, the futures dropped 5-6 cents to close 14 cents lower than the close the day 2 weeks ago... So I figure, time to buy again! I had room for one more semi load. I had to pay $2.762. Current NYMEX Sept futures are $1.845 per gallon, the difference is basis, freight, and tax. While the futures dropped 14 cents during the past two weeks, basis has gotten very expensive and terminal prices only dropped 2.7 cents. So, how does this all shake out for you? How many gallons is a "semi" load? "Room for one more semi load" means what, on your end - a physical or a fiscal cap? Curious. What % of fuel use is: Airline fuel? Auto? Trucks? Other? Heating oil? Power plants? Strategic reserves? Thanks. Montblack |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jim Burns wrote: In the vast majority of situations delivery never takes place and people do not buy the product using futures. However, I'll throw three instances at you that I have direct experience with using futures to both market an actual crop and purchase actual commodities. Selling corn by committing to a futures contract through a commodity broker delivered to a terminal on a specific date. Buying fertilizers, mostly nitrogens, sometimes phosphates, through a dealer who purchases a futures contract on our behalf with a demand delivery notification at a certain date. Buying liquid propane, again through a dealer, who purchases a futures contract through a broker with demand delivery for specified dates. Well, if these futures work like oil futures all you can demand is cash equal to the spot market price on the closing date. It is true that the you can get a barrel of oil with a future for a barrel of oil on the closing date because the value of the future is set exactly to the market price of a barrel of oil in the closing date. If no oil was available at any price then you have the consolation of knowing that the future that you are holding is worth an infinite amount of money. But, in that situation, as a practical matter, its value is not infinite, of course. It is only worth the liability value of the guy or firm who sold you the future. I'm not sure if the liability value includes the guy or firm's value in bankrupcy or if it is limited in some other fashion. I suppose if the guy had a barrel of oil and the price of oil shot off the charts, then the guy would give you his barrrel of oil! But his obligation is just to give you the market price of that barrel. The fuel dealers that have adequate storage will also do the same. Usually you have to commit to 5 semi loads, but they will buy a contract for you, demand delivery, then inventory the fuel. You pay the contract price, plus brokerage, plus storage. The larger dairy farms nearby also purchase corn in this manner. You're absolutely correct about using futures to lock in the price at a certain date, however we use it to guarantee delivery at that price when many of the wholesalers will not step in an guarantee price or availability, or may not have storage available when we need product. Jim wrote in message oups.com... Jim Burns wrote: Sorry, back up.... I misread your answer... You're correct... but say I pay you $3 per gallon for a September contract that climbs to $4 before it settles and goes off the board. I now own $3 gas but the market is $4 and you owe me either the gas or the price of the contract on the contract due date. I may want the gas and you will have the obligation to deliver it to the contract location. Not true. A future is just a bet on the price as I described. It is the case that the payment may be made in kind if both parties agree. But there is not obligation make an in kind transaction on either party. A consumer buys futures to insure a particular price, not actual delivery of oil. They have to buy oil directly or indirectly from the spot market. My point is that if neither of us have the facilities to handle the fuel, neither of us should be in the fuel business. Jim "Jim Burns" wrote in message ... That's an option, not a futures contract. wrote in message ups.com... Jim Burns wrote: Kind of like the stock market, all on emotion. I agree. In theory, if you get "caught" owning a futures contract when it closes, you can be forced to take delivery of the actual product. You can also be forced to deliver the actual product. That is not true. Here is an example of what a future is: Suppose you and I were neighbors. You pay me $3 if I agree to pay you the price posted at the local gas station for regular at 9 AM tomorrow. A future is nothing more than a bet on the future price in the spot market. If futures traders were forced to own facilities to accommodate delivery of the underlying product, or forced to own the product before selling a futures contract, there would be a LOT less speculation. Jim |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Current thoughts are to keep your tanks full, filling when you have room,
cost averaging downward. I was forced to buy a few loads this summer at the highest prices. As prices drifted down, I kept waiting, letting our tanks get pretty empty. We have storage for 35,000 gallons. A semi load is 8500 gallons, but I can split the load between products depending on the truck. You can do the math, but the load I got yesterday cost just over $23k. When we're busy we use a load of diesel fuel every 2-3 weeks, but gasoline is much slower, about a load per month spit between 89NL and 89+lead. One more load was a physical cap. Our gas tanks are full, diesel 3/4. Our LP tank is 30,000 gallons and a semi load of LP is about 9500 gallons. Main use of LP is for drying corn, drying potatoes after washing, and heating buildings. Thankfully we didn't plant much corn, so I don't have to worry about filling that tank every 7-10 days during harvest. You've got a great question about the % of each type of fuel consumed. I hope somebody finds that answer it would be very interesting. Jim |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Without finding a better definition, wikipedia offers this:
a.. 'Physical delivery' - the amount specified of the underlying asset of the contract is delivered by the seller of the contract to the exchange, and by the exchange to the buyers of the contract. Physical delivery is common with commodities and bonds. In practice, it occurs only on a minority of contracts. Most are cancelled out by purchasing a covering position - that is, buying a contract to cancel out an earlier sale (covering a short), or selling a contract to liquidate an earlier purchase (covering a long). Here's the nymex light sweet crude details, including the delivery point (Cushing, OK) quantity (1,000 barrels) and delivery methods. It is a physical delivery contract. It's interesting that if a delivery purchase contract can not be matched with a delivery sale contract, that the exchange randomly picks, ususally from the largest long position holder, a contract to force delivery to the buyer. Jim |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fuel Prices and their Effect on Your Flying | Jon Kraus | Owning | 69 | May 8th 06 12:46 PM |
UFO (Unusual Falling Object) | Mike Yankee | Soaring | 2 | March 24th 06 03:29 PM |
Gas Prices Coming Down | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 15 | September 10th 05 03:07 PM |
AIRNAV not publishing fuel prices... | Victor | Owning | 77 | February 22nd 04 12:02 AM |
AIRNAV not publishing fuel prices... | Victor | Piloting | 81 | February 22nd 04 12:02 AM |