A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Are Weak Links really Necessary for Aero Tow?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old September 17th 06, 03:12 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
baron58y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Are Weak Links really Necessary for Aero Tow?

KM wrote:

Doug Haluza wrote:


After an upset, the towplane will enter an unrecoverable dive, and if
the rope does not break, the speeds will quickly increase beyond
maneuvering speed.


Where do you come up with this? I have NEVER flown an airplane that
could not be pulled out of a dive.


Then you haven't flown tow planes much (if at all), if you can't imagine
that scenario.


Jack
  #12  
Old September 17th 06, 03:38 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
KM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 68
Default Are Weak Links really Necessary for Aero Tow?


baron58y wrote:

Doug Haluza wrote:


After an upset, the towplane will enter an unrecoverable dive, and if
the rope does not break, the speeds will quickly increase beyond
maneuvering speed.


Where do you come up with this? I have NEVER flown an airplane that
could not be pulled out of a dive.


Then you haven't flown tow planes much (if at all), if you can't imagine
that scenario.


Jack, Why dont you go back and read my post?I never said I could not
imagine ANY senario.Are you just trying to be stupid?Doug wrote that a
sailplane could impose a 6000 LB. load on the tail of a towplane.Now if
you want to split hairs THAT would be a scenario I would have a hard
time imagining.Jack, with all your experience towing, have YOU ever
seen such a thing?
Jack

With Warmest Regards,
KMU

  #13  
Old September 17th 06, 05:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
baron58y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Are Weak Links really Necessary for Aero Tow?

KM wrote:

Are you just trying to be stupid?


Sorry, KM, I'm just too stupid to tell when you mean what you write and
when you don't. I'll try harder, I really will.


Doug wrote that a sailplane could impose a 6000 LB. load on the tail
of a towplane....


Jack, with all your experience towing, have YOU ever
seen such a thing?


I don't know if a sailplane can impose a 6000 lb load on a tow plane.
I have just enough experience towing to know it takes only a fraction
of that loading for the tow plane to run out of pitch control, and it
didn't take much experience to find that out.


Jack
  #14  
Old September 17th 06, 05:52 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
KM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 68
Default Are Weak Links really Necessary for Aero Tow?


baron58y wrote:
Sorry, KM, I'm just too stupid to tell when you mean what you write and
when you don't. I'll try harder, I really will.


What?Jack, I think you and I are arguing about two different things
here.I took exeption to you questioning whether I had any
experience.Now I am gonna be honest with you, I dont have much
experience in soaring.I have about 450 hours of towing, and about 200
hours in sailplanes, half of which is in an ASW20 that I own.In
reference to Doug's post,and using my 20 as an example, I dont see how
I could pull 6Gs while on tow.Also, in reference to Dougs post, If a
tow pilot was losing pitch authority, why wouldnt he just pull the
release?I know I would, in fact, some tow pilots I know keep their free
hand on the release till they are through pattern altitude.Now Jack,
lets get back to this experience thing.I notice from your nickname that
you fly a Baron.And that you have to make sure everyone is aware of
this .Why dont you fly that Baron down to Atlanta and we can get into
the cockpit of my 737-800 and talk more about this experience thing.
Or better yet, lets just get back to the post that started this
thread.And the short answer is; Keep a week link in the cockpit of your
sailplane and use it, and two, a sailplane, given a pretty extreem (And
remote) scenario could cause damage to a tow plane.
I don't know if a sailplane can impose a 6000 lb load on a tow plane.
I have just enough experience towing to know it takes only a fraction
of that loading for the tow plane to run out of pitch control, and it
didn't take much experience to find that out.


Jack

Best Wishes, KMU

  #15  
Old September 17th 06, 07:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
baron58y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Are Weak Links really Necessary for Aero Tow?

KM wrote:

I dont see how
I could pull 6Gs while on tow.


Fair enough -- I don't either, but I'm not going to argue about it.
Unless I find some reliable info that states otherwise, Doug might be
right. Got some?


Also, in reference to Dougs post, If a tow pilot was losing pitch
authority, why wouldnt he just pull the release?


Would, if he could -- if he didn't wait too long.


...some tow pilots I know keep their free
hand on the release till they are through pattern altitude.


Pretty smart. So, whatever the g-load of which a sailplane might be
capable while on tow, it's more than enough to upset the tow plane.


...lets get back to this experience thing. I notice from your nickname that
you fly a Baron.


Yet another unfounded assumption on your part. I fly a 1-26.


...we can get into the cockpit of my 737-800 and talk more
about this experience thing.


Oh, excellent! A "mine is bigger than yours" retort. We rarely get those
on r.a.s. -- unlike most of the rest of USENET. When we do it's usually
just some lurking wannabee.

There are probably some folks here whose aviation careers could put both
mine and yours to shame, if we wanted to talk about experience -- so
let's not embarrass ourselves. If "my 737-800" means you own it,
congratulations are in order! But if Delta just pays you to fly it, I
ain't that impressed.


Or better yet, lets just get back to the post that started this
thread.


First smart thing you said. What was that post all about? Oh yeah, here
it is:

wrote: "A lot of the clubs here tow with
thickish
(5/8 inch and some 1/2inch) poly and nylon ropes, without weak
links, and pilots with years of experience say that no load exerted
by the glider can damage the tug - and in the worst of cases even a
5/8 rope will break before damaging the Tug (Most often a supercub)

Comments from knowlegable people please ---

Thanks and kind regards

JS


So civil, not contentious at all -- what a guy that JS is.

So, what do you think KMU -- now that you have reviewed the original post?



Jack
  #16  
Old September 17th 06, 09:54 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Ian Johnston
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default Are Weak Links really Necessary for Aero Tow?

On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 20:32:50 UTC, "Doug Haluza"
wrote:

: 1/4" poly rope is between 1000 and 1200 lbs breaking strength when new,
: not 1/2" which is much too strong.

If by "poly" you mean polyester, those numbers seem a bit low. For
their prestreched stuff, Marlow quote average breaking loads of 2584lb
for 6mm and 7826lb for 12mm.

http://www.marlowropes.com/public/pa...fm?page_id=130

Ian
--

  #17  
Old September 17th 06, 09:55 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Ian Johnston
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default Are Weak Links really Necessary for Aero Tow?

On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 00:54:22 UTC, "KM" wrote:

: Where do you come up with this?I have NEVER flown an airplane that
: could not be pulled out of a dive

Started vertically downwards at an altutude of 300 feet?

Ian
--

  #18  
Old September 17th 06, 12:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Doug Haluza
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 175
Default Are Weak Links really Necessary for Aero Tow?

Oh, my, where to start?

KM wrote:

Are you telling us that the tail can only handle its own weight?You are
using apples and oranges here because you used the FLIGHT loads of a
sailplane and the actual weight of the tow plane.In other words, if a
towplane can sustain 4.4Gs (In the utility category) shouldnt the tail
of said towplane ALSO sustain 4.4Gs.


No, I'm saying the airplane was designed to handle flight and landing
loads, based on it's max gross weight. These loads on the tail are only
a fraction of it's weight. The glider can transfer most of the lifting
force developed by the wing to the rope if a C.G. hook is used for
aerotow. An aircraft with a design load limit of 4.4 G's will have an
ultimate load limit 6.6 G's so a glider with a 1000 lb gross weight
could deliver over 6000 lb of force, before the glider's wings failed.

After an upset, the towplane will enter an unrecoverable dive, and if
the rope does not break, the speeds will quickly increase beyond
maneuvering speed.


Where do you come up with this?I have NEVER flown an airplane that
could not be pulled out of a dive. Another thing to consider is that the
tow pilot would just release by this point.The tost hook will release
at vitually any angle, and even if the plane had a Schweitzer hook, by
forcing the tail up you will change the angle on the rope and the pilot
could then release it.


You can't pull out of the dive if the glider is still attached to your
tail by a rope that won't break. And if you have a Schweizer hook on
the tail, it may not release after the upset because the pull is
greater and may no longer be straight back. There have been several
cases of upset where the tow pilot could not make the hook release, and
the dive would have been unrecoverable if the rope did not break.

Even if you tow with a Tost hook, you still need to react and operate
the release, and this will take more time than a rope needs to break.
If the glider pulls your tail up fast enough, you could be in negative
G's which will take your hand off the knob. How fast can you find and
operate the corect knob when the stuff hits the fan? That time could be
the difference between a low recovery and a splat.

  #19  
Old September 17th 06, 12:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Stealth Pilot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 78
Default Are Weak Links really Necessary for Aero Tow?

On 16 Sep 2006 13:30:15 -0700, "Doug Haluza"
wrote:

I think this is really ignorant and misguided thinking. Yes, absolutely
the glider can damage the tug. The tail structure of most airplanes was
not designed to handle the load of a glider on tow. It was only
designed to handle aerodynamic and landing loads. Considering that the
breaking strength of a 5/8" rope is greater than the weight of the
towplane, it's not hard to imagine that it is certainly strong enough
to damage the tail. A 1000 lb glider can deliver well over 6000 lb of
pull before it's wings come off.


my old auster J1b which is under a long slow restoration was used for
towing gliders at on stage of its life by the Narrogin Gliding Club in
Western Australia. You can clearly see a weld repair to the bottom two
longerons just in front of the tailpost where a glider did its
damndest to tear the back end out of the aircraft.

no weak link seems on evidence to warn of a funeral in the making.
Stealth Pilot
Oz
  #20  
Old September 17th 06, 01:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Papa3
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 444
Default Are Weak Links really Necessary for Aero Tow?


wrote:
A lot of the clubs here tow with thickish (5/8 inch and some 1/2inch)
poly and nylon ropes, without weak links, and pilots with years of
experience say that no load exerted by the glider can damage the tug -
and in the worst of cases even a 5/8 rope will break before damaging
the Tug (Most often a supercub)

Comments from knowlegable people please ---

Thanks and kind regards

JS


Been there, done that (damaged a towplane). I got my CFI-G ticket in
2-33s and had about 100 hours instructing in these. Then, I
volunteered with another club that used Grob 103s for training. A very
different animal from the 2-33. Things get out of whack much faster.
On my second flight with a fairly new student, I let her get a fairly
impressive PIO going in both pitch (vertical position) and roll
(lateral position). On about the 3rd oscillation, she had a huge loop
develop and, before I could reach the release, she applied full
opposite stick. A godawful sproingggg and we were in free flight. I
noticed the towplane (an L-19) in a fairly impressive rolling dive to
the left and saw the rope trailing free from the towplane end (ie.
attached to the glider) . Once I got my nerves under control, we
dropped the remaining rope over the airport and had an uneventful
landing...

.... Uneventful, that is, until the towpilot came walking over. It
didn't take a genius to figure out that he was not in the best of
moods. I noticed he was carrying something in his hand. The
something was the mangled release mechanism. We had broken it from
the towplane at the mounting bolt; it stayed attached only thanks to
the release cable.

So, in answer to your question, it is possible to damage a towplane
with a glider. At this operation, they used 5/8 braided poly with
Schweizer rings for the main rope. The club which owned the G103 used
"adapters" for the Tost release. I believe (can't recall for sure)
that these were also 5/8.

Erik Mann
LS8-18 (P3)

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Winch Launch Stresses on Vintage Gliders Mike Schumann Soaring 31 January 30th 06 09:29 PM
Blanik Weak Link for Winch Launch??? Gary Emerson Soaring 6 February 24th 04 08:08 PM
Weak Dollar (Bad News - Good News) JJ Sinclair Soaring 6 January 27th 04 03:06 AM
Aviation Links Nov. 2 DHeitm8612 General Aviation 0 October 31st 03 01:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.