![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris" wrote in message ... Ethnically he was a Scot and always will be. whether he was in Canada or Scotland he was still a subject of the Crown until he became an American citizen. Even then he was still a Scot. That heritage is important. Try being in Edinburgh in the summer where there seem to be millions of N Americans trying to find their Scottish roots, all wearing silly tartan hats. Bell wasn't in Canada or Scotland. He did move to Canada from Scotland in 1870, but he moved to the US the following year. His work on the telephone took place in Boston. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg Farris wrote:
BONUS QUESTION: What nationality can legitimately claim Radio broadcasting, the Internal Combustion Engine, and the Telephone? (ITALY) These inventions were in development by many people, and some may have built on ideas from others. The light bulb is a good example. Edison is credited by many, but in looking at the issue in more detail, you will find that he bought a patent from a Canadian inventor, who had the essential idea, and was perhaps 90 percent of the way to a practical product. Edison then perfected the filament and gas in the container. So who was the inventor? The one with the original idea, or the one who finally made a saleable product? What Edison excelled at, was making practical use of his inventions, and in marketing. The radio is another example. A number of people were working on various designs, and Nicola Tesla is the one who holds the first patent for a tuneable circuit, which he used to wirelessly transmit information from one place to another in expositions. Tesla was not good at marketing his inventions, unlike Edison, or Marconi, so even though he has claim to the technology, he really didn't do anything practical with it. Since the question about radio was related to "broadcasting", the credit generally goes to Reginald Fessenden, a Canadian, who did much of his experimental work near Kitty Hawk. (Had to get an oblique reference to aviation in my post) While Marconi believed code was transmitted through ether, and marketed point-to-point communication, Fessenden understood radio waves, and developed the first transmitter for voice. He made the first "broadcast", using his designs, and intended for more than one receiver, in 1906. http://www.radiocom.net/Fessenden/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"James Robinson" wrote in message
. .. Greg Farris wrote: BONUS QUESTION: What nationality can legitimately claim Radio broadcasting, the Internal Combustion Engine, and the Telephone? (ITALY) These inventions were in development by many people, and some may have built on ideas from others. The light bulb is a good example. Edison is credited by many, but in looking at the issue in more detail, you will find that he bought a patent from a Canadian inventor, who had the essential idea, and was perhaps 90 percent of the way to a practical product. Edison then perfected the filament and gas in the container. So who was the inventor? The one with the original idea, or the one who finally made a saleable product? Some sources indicate that Nernst got his light bulb into production before Edison. -- Geoff The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The light bulb is a good example. Edison is credited by many, but in
looking at the issue in more detail, you will find that he bought a patent from a Canadian inventor, who had the essential idea, and was perhaps 90 percent of the way to a practical product. Edison then perfected the filament and gas in the container. So who was the inventor? "If I have seen further it is by standing on ye shoulders of Giants." (Isaac Newton in a letter to Robert Hooke, 1676) Stefan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() While Marconi believed code was transmitted through ether, and marketed point-to-point communication, Fessenden understood radio waves, and developed the first transmitter for voice. Not so, Marconi fully understood the significance of waves "When Heinrich Hertz, who discovered wireless waves, died in 1894, Righi wrote an obituary that fired Marconi with the idea of deploying these waves for 'wire-less' telegraphy. "So elementary, so simple in logic," he said later. " http://www.marconicalling.com/marconioverview/life.html |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Greg Farris writes:
RADIOACTIVITY (discovery of) FALSE: The word "radioactivité" comes from Marie Curie, whose pioneering work is of paramount importance, but of course it is subsequent to the breakthrough discovery of X- Rays, by the German Roentgen in 1895. This is a misconception. Radioactivity is nuclear decay. The production of x-rays has nothing to do with radioactive decay. Roentgen discovered the properties of a specific range of frequencies of electromagnetic radiation, but this is completely unrelated to the phenomenon of nuclear decay, which produces radioactivity (emission of subatomic particles and certain frequencies of electromagnetic radiation associated with the spontaneous reconfiguration or mutation of atomic nuclei). -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message This is a misconception. Radioactivity is nuclear decay. The production of x-rays has nothing to do with radioactive decay. Do you have documentable credibility in this area, or is this yet another area of speculation, based upon your nuclear powered flight simulator? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Gaquin" wrote:
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message This is a misconception. Radioactivity is nuclear decay. The production of x-rays has nothing to do with radioactive decay. Do you have documentable credibility in this area, or is this yet another area of speculation, based upon your nuclear powered flight simulator? Mxsmanic is essentially correct. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Logajan wrote:
"John Gaquin" wrote: "Mxsmanic" wrote in message This is a misconception. Radioactivity is nuclear decay. The production of x-rays has nothing to do with radioactive decay. Do you have documentable credibility in this area, or is this yet another area of speculation, based upon your nuclear powered flight simulator? Mxsmanic is essentially correct. Unfortunate, but true. Maybe a lucky guess? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
French Inventions Quizz (slightly OT) | Greg Farris | Piloting | 13 | October 19th 06 10:42 PM |
Saddam paid the French off | JD | Naval Aviation | 4 | October 10th 04 09:49 PM |
The French oil connection | JD | Military Aviation | 31 | March 24th 04 06:51 PM |
About French cowards. | Michael Smith | Military Aviation | 45 | October 22nd 03 03:15 PM |
Ungrateful Americans Unworthy of the French | The Black Monk | Military Aviation | 62 | October 16th 03 08:05 AM |