![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reasonable.
I must ask and encourage you to at least take a discovery flight at a local flying school. Have you ever given it a try? Mxsmanic wrote: The Visitor writes: Do you sit there at your sim, droning along for 3,4,5,6,7,8,9 hours enroute, handflying? No, but I was wondering if I was "cheating" by using the autopilot. What aircraft/route are you asking about? At this very instant (thanks to autopilot), I'm flying VFR from KPHX to KSAN, via GBN JUDTH MOHAK WARTT BZA ARGUS IPL NICKK KUMBA PILLO CANNO BARET RYAHH HAILE KSAN. The GPS unit is handling the routing. I picked 6000 feet MSL for most of the flight because the manual says the Baron is highly efficient at this altitude; I'll go briefly to 8500 to get over the mountains on the way in to San Diego. If this is the way real pilots use autopilot, fine. I just don't want to do anything that would handicap me in real flight (I'm not sure how experienced real pilots are supposed to be in hand-flying). |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ron Natalie" wrote in message m... Turbulence can actually be more difficult on the autopilot. It wants to hold you to course and altitude and tends to overcontrol to stay there. Some AP's require you to disengage during moderate or stronger turbulence. There's also a big difference between rate-based and attitude-based. Hand flying you're willing to take the slight deviations because you know it will even out in the long term. As long as one does not over compensate. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Matt Barrow" wrote: Some AP's require you to disengage during moderate or stronger turbulence. There's also a big difference between rate-based and attitude-based. Is there such a thing as pure "rate-based" vs. "attitude-based" in modern AP's any more? Back in the days of steam gauges, each state variable involved another mechanical data pick-off and gobs of discrete circuitry, so controlling one variable at a time made sense. In a glass cockpit, I would think you would grab all the data that's available and come up with a control strategy which mixes inputs. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Within what limits? I fly to a heading and then 30 seconds later when I check it again I've drifted two degrees or so and have to move it back. Altitude is a much bigger problem, with a constant roller-coaster ride through as much as 150 feet or so for quite a while. By the time I wrestle it onto a steady altitude, I'm being told to climb or descend again. The accepted limits are documented in the Airmen Practical Test Standards, which you can read online he http://www.faa.gov/education_researc...ards/pilot/med ia/FAA-S-8081-14A.pdf The limits for Instrument flight are slightly "tighter" and are documented he http://www.faa.gov/education_researc...ards/media/FAA -S-8081-4D.pdf 2 degrees of heading is acceptable. 150 feet of altitude, however, is not. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: The Visitor writes: Do you sit there at your sim, droning along for 3,4,5,6,7,8,9 hours enroute, handflying? No, but I was wondering if I was "cheating" by using the autopilot. What aircraft/route are you asking about? At this very instant (thanks to autopilot), I'm flying VFR from KPHX to KSAN, via GBN JUDTH MOHAK WARTT BZA ARGUS IPL NICKK KUMBA PILLO CANNO BARET RYAHH HAILE KSAN. The GPS unit is handling the routing. I picked 6000 feet MSL for most of the flight because the manual says the Baron is highly efficient at this altitude; I'll go briefly to 8500 to get over the mountains on the way in to San Diego. Is this route off-airway? What is the OROCA in that area? 8500 is not an IFR altitude, so unless you will be changing to VFR on top, you'll probably either be at 8000 or 10000 in real life. I don't know the area well enough to know for sure... It sounds like you have some ideas of what it takes, but you really should get some formal training. If you're that afraid of flying, you should at least go to a Ground School course. They are not typically very expensive, but they are very informative. Another alternative might be to purchase the Gliem test prep books. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Visitor writes:
Reasonable. I must ask and encourage you to at least take a discovery flight at a local flying school. Have you ever given it a try? No. No money and no time to try it. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Natalie writes:
Sometimes it's BETTER FORM to use the autopilot on shorter flights. Enroute is generally a lot of inactivity. Takeoff and landing is the busy part of IFR. Best to off-load onto George when you are busy. I'm confused. Are you saying that autopilot should be used on take-off and landing? It seems that most autopilots aren't much help with take-off and landing, beyond following an ILS approach most of the way in. Large aircraft have fancy stuff that can autoland, but I don't know if small aircraft can be equipped in that way (?). Turbulence can actually be more difficult on the autopilot. It wants to hold you to course and altitude and tends to overcontrol to stay there. Hand flying you're willing to take the slight deviations because you know it will even out in the long term. Interesting. Are there any fancy autopilots that are smart enough to deal with turbulence? On a commercial airliner, wouldn't it be preferable to let the autopilot wrestle with the turbulence in order to avoid upsetting passengers with more radical movements in hand flying (assuming that the pilot does not attempt to correct for minor movements from turbulence)? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mxsmanic wrote: No. No money and no time to try it. Where aare you located? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Judah writes:
The accepted limits are documented in the Airmen Practical Test Standards, which you can read online he http://www.faa.gov/education_researc...ards/pilot/med ia/FAA-S-8081-14A.pdf The limits for Instrument flight are slightly "tighter" and are documented he http://www.faa.gov/education_researc...ards/media/FAA -S-8081-4D.pdf 2 degrees of heading is acceptable. 150 feet of altitude, however, is not. Thanks. I have saved these documents and will examine them in greater detail as time permits. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Visitor writes:
Where aare you located? Paris, France -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rudder for final runway alignment (?) | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 124 | October 2nd 06 09:39 PM |
Piper Altimatic II autopilots - anyone? | nobody | Owning | 12 | February 8th 06 03:38 PM |
DGs and Autopilots | Andrew Gideon | Owning | 11 | April 14th 05 06:04 PM |
Autopilots... failure modes | john smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 14 | October 22nd 04 05:22 AM |
Artificial Horizon/Autopilot Connection | Jay Honeck | Owning | 2 | September 7th 03 05:07 PM |