![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A 200 King Air with full fuel can typically carry 800 pounds
of pilots, passengers and baggage. That's is why the certified the 300 and now the 350 King Air, to get full fuel and all the seats and baggage legally. Airplanes get weight added, often for little good reason. More entertainment radios, extra plush seats, a potty or coffee bar. Then they get dirty, dented and pilots wonder why they don't fly so well. In Alaska, the regulations allow legal flight at up to 10% over certified gross weight under some conditions. Elsewhere, many pilots just fill the seats and tanks and go. Sometimes they don't go far. Fuel management and calculating the trade-offs between necessary range and payload is part of "big" airplane flying. As for commercial operations, the FAR requires that the airplane be re-weighed every 3 years if I remember correctly. Factories weigh a sample number of airplanes and thus some airplanes have never been weighed. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P wrote in message ... | I've noticed that new souped up Mooney has almost no useful load with | full fuel. (Less than 1 big pilot) | | It strikes me that there are two limits to gross weight in a single. | The structural and climb performnace limits and the statutory limit that a single engine | stall speed must be less than 61K( I think this number is right) | | So this makes me think that the new souped up mooney is probably flown over gross | on the asumption that the only real limit here is the artifical statutory limit. | This would make me feel very uncomfortable. If you routinely fly at over gross weight | you never know close you are to the real structural limits. | | | I grew up in Alaska and a lot of the bush planes are routinely flown | well over gross.... both knowingly by the pilots and via fudged paperwork. | I've was personally involved with reweighing a Beaver DHC-2 where the official | paperwork had the empty weight suspiciously low. The last weighting paperwork accounted for | Full Fuel, and when we weighed it it was heaver than it should be by this amount. | I suspect that the previouse weighing had the tanks empty and accounted for full. | A lot of the forrest service contracts in South East Alaska had contact limits that said | the aircraft provided must have XX useful low. These numbers were unreasonably low for | most of the specified aircraft models, encopuraging the operators to cheat or go out of business. | | | | |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CRS: V-22 Osprey Tilt-Rotor Aircraft | Mike | Rotorcraft | 3 | September 27th 06 04:44 PM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | September 2nd 04 05:15 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | May 1st 04 07:29 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |