A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

tow hook limitation question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old February 4th 07, 05:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 34
Default tow hook limitation question

On Feb 4, 10:54 am, "Jim Vincent" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...



Several years ago in soaring magazine
there was an article about a glider kiting and the
tow pilot was unable to release. However the cause
was not that the schweizer release jammed, it was the
result of a poorly installed and secured release cable
housing. The cable ties used to secure the release
cable housing to the airframe failed, which then resulted
in excessive slack in the release cable. This excessive
slack meant that the tow pilots release handle was
incapable of pulling on the schweizer release lever.


Many years ago there were tests of Schwiezer releases that showed that
they did, indeed jam. These should all be replaced ASAP. Anyone with
a brain can look at a Schwiezer release and see why it will jam under
high loads.


2c


I'll bite....why will it jam under high loads?


This is extremely difficult to describe without a diagram, but the way
the release is constructed causes pressure to be applied to the
mechanism in such a way that higher forces are required in the cockpit
as upward pressure on the mechanism is applied (towplane low, glider
high). Too much pressure can cause this force to be great enough that
the pilot will not be able to deliver such pressure in an emergency
situation.

2c

  #12  
Old February 4th 07, 06:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Jim Vincent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 92
Default tow hook limitation question


wrote in message
ups.com...
On Feb 4, 10:54 am, "Jim Vincent" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...



Several years ago in soaring magazine
there was an article about a glider kiting and the
tow pilot was unable to release. However the cause
was not that the schweizer release jammed, it was the
result of a poorly installed and secured release cable
housing. The cable ties used to secure the release
cable housing to the airframe failed, which then resulted
in excessive slack in the release cable. This excessive
slack meant that the tow pilots release handle was
incapable of pulling on the schweizer release lever.


Many years ago there were tests of Schwiezer releases that showed that
they did, indeed jam. These should all be replaced ASAP. Anyone with
a brain can look at a Schwiezer release and see why it will jam under
high loads.


2c


I'll bite....why will it jam under high loads?


This is extremely difficult to describe without a diagram, but the way
the release is constructed causes pressure to be applied to the
mechanism in such a way that higher forces are required in the cockpit
as upward pressure on the mechanism is applied (towplane low, glider
high). Too much pressure can cause this force to be great enough that
the pilot will not be able to deliver such pressure in an emergency
situation.

2c


Kevin, do you have any known examples of this happening? Flying off the
winch is very similar to a glider high scenario, yet I've never had a
problem releasing even under tension.


  #13  
Old February 4th 07, 06:49 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Marc Ramsey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 207
Default tow hook limitation question

Jim Vincent wrote:
Kevin, do you have any known examples of this happening? Flying off the
winch is very similar to a glider high scenario, yet I've never had a
problem releasing even under tension.


There have been a number of accidents apparently caused by Schweizer
hooks jamming on the tow plane when the glider gets too high. However,
most everyone has applied an approved fix from years ago, turn the
release assembly upside down and the jamming problem goes away...

Marc
  #14  
Old February 4th 07, 07:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Marc Ramsey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 207
Default tow hook limitation question

Marc Ramsey wrote:
Jim Vincent wrote:
Kevin, do you have any known examples of this happening? Flying off
the winch is very similar to a glider high scenario, yet I've never
had a problem releasing even under tension.


There have been a number of accidents apparently caused by Schweizer
hooks jamming on the tow plane when the glider gets too high. However,
most everyone has applied an approved fix from years ago, turn the
release assembly upside down and the jamming problem goes away...


Here's a 337 for a Pawnee:

http://home.att.net/~jdburch/Form337.htm

Marc
  #15  
Old February 4th 07, 07:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Marc Ramsey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 207
Default tow hook limitation question

Marc Ramsey wrote:
Marc Ramsey wrote:
Jim Vincent wrote:
Kevin, do you have any known examples of this happening? Flying off
the winch is very similar to a glider high scenario, yet I've never
had a problem releasing even under tension.


There have been a number of accidents apparently caused by Schweizer
hooks jamming on the tow plane when the glider gets too high.
However, most everyone has applied an approved fix from years ago,
turn the release assembly upside down and the jamming problem goes
away...


Here's a 337 for a Pawnee:

http://home.att.net/~jdburch/Form337.htm


And an article:

http://home.att.net/~jdburch/towhook.htm

Marc
  #16  
Old February 4th 07, 08:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tony Verhulst
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 193
Default tow hook limitation question


Kevin, do you have any known examples of this happening? Flying off the
winch is very similar to a glider high scenario, yet I've never had a
problem releasing even under tension.


Jim,

Several years ago, the PIC pulled the release on an L13 and started his
right turn. The problem was that he was still on tow behind the Bird
Dog. A second later, both tow plane and glider were pointed at the
ground - still attached. The tow pilot reported that he pulled his
release and nothing happened. Several, much more "assertive" attempts
ensued and finally the 2 aircraft parted company - having lost 1000ft.
Had this been a pattern tow, there would have been fatalities.
Interestingly, both aircraft had problems releasing. The Birddog has a
Schweizer release. As I was chief instructor at the time, I asked for a
written statement from the (rated) glider pilot. The names have been
removed.

.................................................. ................

Glider pilot report

Saturday November 6th, being towed by the birddog L-19 in the Blanik
L-13, I had a serious release incident.

On preflight I often noticed that the release mechanism is not as clean
as on the Schweizer models. I had never given any attention to that
point and that was already the first mistake.

Reaching 5000', I over emphasized on the climbing turn after the
release. I pulled the release and made my right turn. Being busy
clearing the right turn And getting to the right airspeed, I did not
notice the rope was still attached until the glider violently yawed to
the left and caused the birddog to start to go into a spin.

Over emphasizing on the turn without verifying that the rope actually
released after pulling the release is obviously a terrible mistake.
Unlike the 2-33 in which the release is very sensitive, the blanik
requires you to pull the handle all the way back and will not release
with a side load on the jaws!

Having pulled the handle twice and noticing that this was hopeless, I
saw that the towplane could not release either. Indeed, the birddog
release also locked when its the tail got pulled up by a glider. To make
matter worse, the tow plane with its tail pulled up was forced in to a
dive by the glider. It could not level off even with full aft elevators.
From there the only hope was a release or a rope break before hitting
the ground (another reason for not using a too strong rope).

Trying to get back on normal tow position I dove. I quickly noticed that
this would not be possible. Thanks to the streamlined shape of the
Blanik I could dive fast enough to remove some of the load on towplane
tail. It allowed the tow pilot to release the rope with a strong yank on
his release handle.

Fortunately, this incident did not aggravate into a tragic accident.
This incident showed me how quickly things can deteriorate if I don't
use the proper procedures. Everybody knows how important verifying the
correct effect of one's input is. I did not know it enough on that flight.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tow Hook on Cessna 180 - Update Stuart Grant Soaring 13 April 10th 20 10:48 AM
Nose hook addition Jack Soaring 2 April 29th 06 08:08 AM
SZD55 Launch hook info Sleigh Soaring 3 December 28th 05 08:57 PM
Weight Limitation for the Front seats of a C172 Brad Zeigler Piloting 3 August 15th 05 02:43 AM
Lyc. O-360 cylinder question JB Owning 13 November 27th 04 09:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.