A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Which GRP single-seater has the lowest cockpit weight?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old February 1st 07, 07:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Andreas Alin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24
Default Which GRP single-seater has the lowest cockpit weight?

The mother of a teenage flight club member made a polstered cushion with
plummet sheets inside. They say it weights 20 kg (about 40lbs). It was
hard for the boy to carry it to the plane, but he managed it. He
additionally needs the Ballast Weights near the pedals.

Andreas

Maciek schrieb:
PW-5 - 121 lbs
A friend of mine, who had similar problem, used to carry a little bag filled
with sand (made by her mother;-), which placed under her...you know where,
added some extra lbs (even 20 ). One thing you should do if you use this
solution is to make sure, that the sand never gets out into the cockpit - it
may cause seizing of some mechanisms and it can end badly. Better if you
raplace sand with some stones (less comfortable, but more safety)

Maciek


  #12  
Old February 1st 07, 07:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 58
Default Which GRP single-seater has the lowest cockpit weight?


Ok folks, I think I've read in just about every "How to fly
sailplanes" book including those by Piggott and Knauff that you don't
want to add ballast using an "under the deriere´ (never could do
French)" type. If you are going to add ballast make sure it is
attached to the airframe and not held on by your butt! I think this is
in a couple of POH's I've read also.

Bob (who unfortunately does not have a need for ballast)

  #14  
Old February 1st 07, 09:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
01-- Zero One
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 114
Default Which GRP single-seater has the lowest cockpit weight?

I don't think that is the point, Andreas... The problem is that you
then have a substantial weight that will be free to mash against you if
you hit turbulence or an accident, pinning you between the belts and a
pretty heavy mass.



Larry





"Andreas Alin" wrote in
message :

OK, then use it with an 5 point harness and it should be safe. Thx for
remembering, I forgot to add this to my satement before.

Andreas

schrieb:
Ok folks, I think I've read in just about every "How to fly
sailplanes" book including those by Piggott and Knauff that you don't
want to add ballast using an "under the deriere´ (never could do
French)" type. If you are going to add ballast make sure it is
attached to the airframe and not held on by your butt! I think this is
in a couple of POH's I've read also.

Bob (who unfortunately does not have a need for ballast)



  #15  
Old February 2nd 07, 03:32 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Andreas Maurer[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 91
Default Which GRP single-seater has the lowest cockpit weight?

On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:07:09 +0100, Andreas Alin
wrote:

The mother of a teenage flight club member made a polstered cushion with
plummet sheets inside. They say it weights 20 kg (about 40lbs). It was
hard for the boy to carry it to the plane, but he managed it. He
additionally needs the Ballast Weights near the pedals.


Most of the girls in my club need about the same amount of lead
weight. Usually the boys carry the weight around for them...

Sex sells.



Bye
Andreas
  #16  
Old February 2nd 07, 05:36 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Jeremy Zawodny
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 85
Default Which GRP single-seater has the lowest cockpit weight?

Andreas Maurer wrote:
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:07:09 +0100, Andreas Alin
wrote:

The mother of a teenage flight club member made a polstered cushion with
plummet sheets inside. They say it weights 20 kg (about 40lbs). It was
hard for the boy to carry it to the plane, but he managed it. He
additionally needs the Ballast Weights near the pedals.


Most of the girls in my club need about the same amount of lead
weight. Usually the boys carry the weight around for them...


Girls?

In a glider club?

How'd you manage *that*? Our ratio is on the order of 60:1. That's the
female to male ratio, not the glide ratio!

Jeremy
  #17  
Old February 2nd 07, 09:26 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
J. Nieuwenhuize
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 83
Default Which GRP single-seater has the lowest cockpit weight?

On 2 feb, 06:36, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
Girls?

In a glider club?

How'd you manage *that*? Our ratio is on the order of 60:1. That's the
female to male ratio, not the glide ratio!

Jeremy


Though it is usually hard to distinguish them from the guys there áre
girls who fly. Whether it's the gliding or the huge number of male
that attracts them isn't too sure...

  #19  
Old February 2nd 07, 04:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Jack[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 82
Default Which GRP single-seater has the lowest cockpit weight?

J. Nieuwenhuize wrote:

Though it is usually hard to distinguish them from the guys there áre
girls who fly.


Sorry to here that. The females at our club are easy to identify.


Jack
  #20  
Old February 3rd 07, 04:42 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 37
Default Which GRP single-seater has the lowest cockpit weight?

On Feb 1, 11:06 am, "Maciek" wrote:
PW-5 - 121 lbs
A friend of mine, who had similar problem, used to carry a little bag filled
with sand (made by her mother;-), which placed under her...you know where,
added some extra lbs (even 20 ). One thing you should do if you use this
solution is to make sure, that the sand never gets out into the cockpit - it
may cause seizing of some mechanisms and it can end badly. Better if you
raplace sand with some stones (less comfortable, but more safety)

Maciek




PW-5 as an One Class Design by definition must acomodate the pilots in
widest range of weights. The gross weight of all mashines at the grid
must be the same, adjusted to the heaviest pilot in the competition.
It has two system of balasts. Four removable weights in tail, which
you add when the (pilots + parachute) is over 167 lbs as far as to
231 lbs. We also have eight small compartments under the removable
pilots sit pan, where you can put eight 10 lbs bags of lead shot. With
all begs in place firmly secured and no tail balast you could be as
light as 81 lbs with a parachute. Preatty wide range and very
safe. :-)
Richard

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
more radial fans like fw190? jt Military Aviation 51 August 28th 04 04:22 AM
F35 cost goes up. Pat Carpenter Military Aviation 116 April 11th 04 07:32 PM
Bolkcom of the CRS against F/A-22 Henry J Cobb Military Aviation 20 March 8th 04 04:14 PM
RV-7a baggage area David Smith Home Built 32 December 15th 03 04:08 AM
Va: maneuvering speed ad nauseam Koopas Ly Piloting 14 November 29th 03 05:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.