U.S. preparations for invading Iran are complete

"T3" wrote in message
...

"Mark Test" wrote in message
ink.net...
"T3" wrote in message
Heh, that didn't stop us from invading Iraq, did it? Oddly enough, we
still
don't get any of it, though when the dust finally settles, China prolly
will...

So true....my point of course is that the left always say it's
about the oil...

It *is/was* about oil and really nothing else, unless of course you think
it's sand, or something like that, 'cause it damn sure wasn't about 9/11,
WMD's, or for that matter democracy...


All about oil?.....oil that the US never needed. The US gets only 16%
of its oil from the mid-east..(Saudi).

Mark

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:58:48 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"T3" wrote in message
.. .

"Mark Test" wrote in message
ink.net...
The article contains rather speculative generalities about potential
preparations over the last four years. But I agree, this is
more-or-
less the last ditch for the petro-imperialists: only two more years
"guaranteed" Bush-time in which to complete their Persian-Gulf oil-
empire project.

Well, since the US does not get a single drop of Iranian oil.....I
suppose
you are suggesting the US suddenly has decided to steal it?

Heh, that didn't stop us from invading Iraq, did it? Oddly enough, we
still
don't get any of it, though when the dust finally settles, China prolly
will...

So true....my point of course is that the left always say it's
about the oil...

Interesting that a bright boy like yu can be so obviously wrong,
isn't it?

Don't imply that it's the US that wants or needs mid-east oil. The US
does however fight to preserve the flow of oil.....since it's disruption
would affect the price of oil on the world market.

That whole Bush "Persian oil empire" crack is what I was commenting
on.

Mark

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 02:43:06 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:58:48 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"T3" wrote in message
.. .

"Mark Test" wrote in message
ink.net...
The article contains rather speculative generalities about potential
preparations over the last four years. But I agree, this is
more-or-
less the last ditch for the petro-imperialists: only two more years
"guaranteed" Bush-time in which to complete their Persian-Gulf oil-
empire project.

Well, since the US does not get a single drop of Iranian oil.....I
suppose
you are suggesting the US suddenly has decided to steal it?

Heh, that didn't stop us from invading Iraq, did it? Oddly enough, we
still
don't get any of it, though when the dust finally settles, China prolly
will...

So true....my point of course is that the left always say it's
about the oil...

Interesting that a bright boy like yu can be so obviously wrong,
isn't it?

Don't imply that it's the US that wants or needs mid-east oil. The US
does however fight to preserve the flow of oil.....since it's disruption
would affect the price of oil on the world market.

I haven't implied anyting like that at all

That whole Bush "Persian oil empire" crack is what I was commenting
on.

Well you chose to do so by saying that the left always say it's
about the oil, an obviously fallacious crack.


Peter Skelton

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 02:43:06 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:58:48 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"T3" wrote in message
.. .

"Mark Test" wrote in message
ink.net...
The article contains rather speculative generalities about
potential
preparations over the last four years. But I agree, this is
more-or-
less the last ditch for the petro-imperialists: only two more
years
"guaranteed" Bush-time in which to complete their Persian-Gulf
oil-
empire project.

Well, since the US does not get a single drop of Iranian oil.....I
suppose
you are suggesting the US suddenly has decided to steal it?

Heh, that didn't stop us from invading Iraq, did it? Oddly enough,
we
still
don't get any of it, though when the dust finally settles, China
prolly
will...

So true....my point of course is that the left always say it's
about the oil...

Interesting that a bright boy like yu can be so obviously wrong,
isn't it?

Don't imply that it's the US that wants or needs mid-east oil. The US
does however fight to preserve the flow of oil.....since it's disruption
would affect the price of oil on the world market.

I haven't implied anyting like that at all

That whole Bush "Persian oil empire" crack is what I was commenting
on.

Well you chose to do so by saying that the left always say it's
about the oil, an obviously fallacious crack.

So, "Persian oil empire" is a right-wing crack?

On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 01:59:36 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 02:43:06 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:58:48 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"T3" wrote in message
.. .

"Mark Test" wrote in message
ink.net...
The article contains rather speculative generalities about
potential
preparations over the last four years. But I agree, this is
more-or-
less the last ditch for the petro-imperialists: only two more
years
"guaranteed" Bush-time in which to complete their Persian-Gulf
oil-
empire project.

Well, since the US does not get a single drop of Iranian oil.....I
suppose
you are suggesting the US suddenly has decided to steal it?

Heh, that didn't stop us from invading Iraq, did it? Oddly enough,
we
still
don't get any of it, though when the dust finally settles, China
prolly
will...

So true....my point of course is that the left always say it's
about the oil...

Interesting that a bright boy like yu can be so obviously wrong,
isn't it?

Don't imply that it's the US that wants or needs mid-east oil. The US
does however fight to preserve the flow of oil.....since it's disruption
would affect the price of oil on the world market.

I haven't implied anyting like that at all

That whole Bush "Persian oil empire" crack is what I was commenting
on.

Well you chose to do so by saying that the left always say it's
about the oil, an obviously fallacious crack.

So, "Persian oil empire" is a right-wing crack?


I have said nothing like that.

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 01:59:36 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 02:43:06 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"Peter Skelton" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:58:48 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"T3" wrote in message
.. .

"Mark Test" wrote in message
ink.net...
The article contains rather speculative generalities about
potential
preparations over the last four years. But I agree, this is
more-or-
less the last ditch for the petro-imperialists: only two more
years
"guaranteed" Bush-time in which to complete their Persian-Gulf
oil-
empire project.

Well, since the US does not get a single drop of Iranian
oil.....I
suppose
you are suggesting the US suddenly has decided to steal it?

Heh, that didn't stop us from invading Iraq, did it? Oddly
enough,
we
still
don't get any of it, though when the dust finally settles, China
prolly
will...

So true....my point of course is that the left always say it's
about the oil...

Interesting that a bright boy like yu can be so obviously wrong,
isn't it?

Don't imply that it's the US that wants or needs mid-east oil. The US
does however fight to preserve the flow of oil.....since it's
disruption
would affect the price of oil on the world market.

I haven't implied anyting like that at all

That whole Bush "Persian oil empire" crack is what I was commenting
on.

Well you chose to do so by saying that the left always say it's
about the oil, an obviously fallacious crack.

So, "Persian oil empire" is a right-wing crack?


I have said nothing like that.

Didn't say you did.....that's the crack I was replying to though....
And I've yet to hear reasons like, to promote democracy, to
maintain stability, to remove a dictator.....from the left.

Only it's about the oil.....is what the majority on the left spew.

Mark

On Feb 19, 10:52 am, "Mark Test" wrote:
"Freeman" wrote in message

ups.com...



On Feb 17, 5:23 pm, "AirRaid" wrote:
On Feb 17, 5:38 am, "Freeman" wrote:

On Feb 16, 11:15 pm, "AirRaid Mach 2.5" wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/23rcp3

US preparations for invading Iran are complete: Report
Rashmee Roshan Lal
[ 16 Feb, 2007 2050hrs ISTTIMES NEWS NETWORK ]

The original article appears to be ...
Dan Plesch, "Iran - Ready to attack", New Statesman, cover date of 19
Feb. 2007http://www.newstatesman.com/200702190014

thanks for that, interesting,.

The article contains rather speculative generalities about potential
preparations over the last four years. But I agree, this is more-or-
less the last ditch for the petro-imperialists: only two more years
"guaranteed" Bush-time in which to complete their Persian-Gulf oil-
empire project.

Well, since the US does not get a single drop of Iranian oil.....I suppose
you are suggesting the US suddenly has decided to steal it?

Hardly suddenly.

On Feb 19, 6:38 pm, "Mark Test" wrote:
"T3" wrote in message

...





"Mark Test" wrote in message
link.net...
"T3" wrote in message
Heh, that didn't stop us from invading Iraq, did it? Oddly enough, we
still
don't get any of it, though when the dust finally settles, China prolly
will...

So true....my point of course is that the left always say it's
about the oil...

It *is/was* about oil and really nothing else, unless of course you think
it's sand, or something like that, 'cause it damn sure wasn't about 9/11,
WMD's, or for that matter democracy...

All about oil?.....oil that the US never needed. The US gets only 16%
of its oil from the mid-east..(Saudi).

The petro-imperialists are *aiming* to get a lot more. Or at least
have Europe and China by the ********.

On Feb 19, 6:43 pm, "Mark Test" wrote:
"Peter Skelton" wrote in message

...



On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:58:48 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"T3" wrote in message
.. .

"Mark Test" wrote in message
hlink.net...
The article contains rather speculative generalities about potential
preparations over the last four years. But I agree, this is
more-or-
less the last ditch for the petro-imperialists: only two more years
"guaranteed" Bush-time in which to complete their Persian-Gulf oil-
empire project.

Well, since the US does not get a single drop of Iranian oil.....I
suppose
you are suggesting the US suddenly has decided to steal it?

Heh, that didn't stop us from invading Iraq, did it? Oddly enough, we
still
don't get any of it, though when the dust finally settles, China prolly
will...

So true....my point of course is that the left always say it's
about the oil...

Interesting that a bright boy like yu can be so obviously wrong,
isn't it?

Don't imply that it's the US that wants or needs mid-east oil. The US
does however fight to preserve the flow of oil.....since it's disruption
would affect the price of oil on the world market.

Oil-as-power is another real possibility. To be gatekeeper of the
supplies ...
http://us.geocities.com/libertystrikesback/kissex.html

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 02:38:39 GMT, "Mark Test"
wrote:

"T3" wrote in message
.. .

"Mark Test" wrote in message
ink.net...
"T3" wrote in message
Heh, that didn't stop us from invading Iraq, did it? Oddly enough, we
still
don't get any of it, though when the dust finally settles, China prolly
will...

So true....my point of course is that the left always say it's
about the oil...

It *is/was* about oil and really nothing else, unless of course you think
it's sand, or something like that, 'cause it damn sure wasn't about 9/11,
WMD's, or for that matter democracy...


All about oil?.....oil that the US never needed. The US gets only 16%
of its oil from the mid-east..(Saudi).

I like to ask the proponents of the "petro-imperialist" theory to tell
me, specifically, which oil companies have delivered how much "stolen"
oil to the U.S. This question generally causes them to be very
flumoxxed and to drool upon themselves as they try for an answer.

Bill Kambic
Haras Lucero, Kingston, TN
Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão