![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 25, 7:28 pm, "Tony" wrote:
Don't get too tangled up in trying to find some 'optimum'. This is instructive: do a manual calculation of what you consider might be three or four 'likely best' routes. When you get done cranking the numbers, you'll likely find not an important difference in your several results. It's that old thing when we learned calculus -- nothing very interesting happens near a maxima or minima. I normally do this stuff manually (using a computer nevertheless, but manually entering the altitudes and ETDs), and it is a very cumbersome process. The results are, like you say, are not dramatically different, but I have found situations where moving the departure time by a few hours, or planning a different fuel stop can shave off 30 minutes of flight time from a 500 mile trip. When the airplane cost is $100/hr that could be an important consideration. Also, in most flight planning situations we use a single cruising altitude for the entire flight. Adjusting the cruising altitude on a continuous basis is not handled by any software that I know of. If the software can come up an ideal altitude profile, route profile and the best time of departure, the pilot can then use this baseline information from which to modify parameters to fit his specific needs. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Sarangan wrote:
Also, in most flight planning situations we use a single cruising altitude for the entire flight. Adjusting the cruising altitude on a continuous basis is not handled by any software that I know of. If the software can come up an ideal altitude profile, route profile and the best time of departure, the pilot can then use this baseline information from which to modify parameters to fit his specific needs. Destination Direct (destroyed, then killed by SAIC) had an option where you could enter the winds and temps at various altitudes and depending on the altitudes generated by the planner or altered by the user, the flight plan was recomputed appropriately. Jepp's low-end FliteStar can use winds but since I won't open my firewall to allow it to access the Jepp weather server, I don't know how well it works. But it also uses a variation of the Djikstra algorithm - easy to identify it when you watch it attempt to generate a flight path given certain conditions. Kinda fun, too. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
$10 Flight Planning Software | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 15th 07 06:55 PM |
Best Flight Planning Software for a jet? | CaptainCraig | Piloting | 2 | September 8th 06 02:50 AM |
Flight planning software | Cetacea | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | May 13th 05 11:13 PM |
Flight Planning Software | Cetacea | Piloting | 2 | May 13th 05 08:19 PM |
flight planning software | Russ Bird | Piloting | 1 | November 22nd 04 02:08 AM |