![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jcarlyle wrote:
A few days ago, Bumper mentioned his TPAS "went deaf" in his transponder equipped glider while flying near other transponders. Jim S asked about the blanking distance, and Eric Greenwell found in the manual for the Zaon MRX that this was about 0.4 miles. Not quite: 0.4 mi Now consider the other transponder being farther away from ATC than you, on the line that connects you and ATC. Your transponder fires first and blanks the ZAON. The ATC pulse has to propagate to him for his transponder to fire, then his transponder pulse has to propagate back to you to be detected by the ZAON. The net result is that he can be as close as 0.2 nm for you to detect him. Now suppose the other transponder is between you and ATC, on the line that connects you and ATC. Guess what? You'll never detect him! The ATC pulse reaches him first, firing his transponder, and both pulses reach your ship at essentially the same time. Your transponder then fires, blanking the ZAON. By the time it unblanks, his pulse and your pulse have propagated far beyond the ZAON antenna - they aren't around for detection. John's analysis seemed plausible, so I contacted Zaon about it. Summarizing a fairly technical reply: "The situation described can produce a dead zone. Generally it is not a problem in practice, because there are many other interrogation sources (mainly other ATC radars and TCAS systems) that interrogate transponders besides the ATC radar in line with your glider and the other aircraft. These replies will not be masked, so range and altitude can be determined by the MRX." I'd add that it's unlikely an aircraft could stay directly between you and the ATC radar for very long. If it was climbing, you'd have to climb even faster, and vice versa. If it was coming straight out from the radar, you'd have to be flying directly towards or away on the sloped line going to or from the radar, and so on. So, it's an event with a low probability in the first place, and a high probability of mitigation by interrogations from other sources. Further, if it's an airliner, it has TCAS (he'll see you, you'll see him); if it's a GA aircraft, it might be in contact with ATC and warned of your presence, or it might have a PCAS unit and detect your transponder; and finally, you might visually detect each other! My opinion: the dead zone risk is insignificant. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eric Greenwell" wrote in message news:nt1Kh.5445$0W5.1788@trndny05... My opinion: the dead zone risk is insignificant. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org Having flown with a TPAS for about 5 years now, my experience backs up what Eric is saying. While I've noticed the "blind spot" often, mostly while flying with other gliders, I've always had visual contact on the other aircraft. I think this is because the blind spot doesn't extend all that far from my aircraft. bumper |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric,
Thanks so much for following up with Zaon. Kudos to Zaon for being forthcoming with you, too. I love my MRX, and the attitude Zaon expressed in answering you makes me like the company that much more. By the way, I think there's a typo in your reply regarding minimum detectable distance - I think you meant to say 0.1 mi, not 0.4 mi. -John On Mar 14, 8:39 pm, Eric Greenwell wrote: Eric Greenwell found in the manual for the Zaon MRX that this was about 0.4 miles. Not quite: 0.4 mi John's analysis seemed plausible, so I contacted Zaon about it. Summarizing a fairly technical reply: "The situation described can produce a dead zone. Generally it is not a problem in practice, because there are many other interrogation sources (mainly other ATC radars and TCAS systems) that interrogate transponders besides the ATC radar in line with your glider and the other aircraft. These replies will not be masked, so range and altitude can be determined by the MRX." |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Monroy ADT-200 TPAS | Ramy Yanetz | Soaring | 6 | May 10th 05 09:58 AM |
TPAS experiences - good, bad, and ugly | Eric Greenwell | Soaring | 1 | January 19th 05 09:49 PM |
Blind 430 | john smith | Owning | 16 | January 4th 05 07:57 PM |
FS : TPAS Sure Check model RX-110 | Brian | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 16th 04 03:21 PM |
Surecheck TPAS (was Proxalert R?) | Tim Mara | Soaring | 0 | February 10th 04 07:19 PM |