![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a public service, I have again reviewed Boyer's testimony to
Congress. At .49 minutes in, he says he has "never seen such a distortion" regarding the funding crisis, which he thinks is fictious. For the Destroyer to talk about "distortions" is laughable on its face. Why does he never mention the FACT the the AV gas tax contributes less than 5% to the aviation trust fund? Probably, he considers factual data as distorting his mission to continue to rip off the taxpaying public. At 1.20 in, he for the first time says "get user fees off the table" before engaging in meaningful dialogue. More silliness. Talk must be on the Destroyer's terms, using his "nondistorted facts." The man never, ever discusses the funding sources of the AIP -- cant' go there. But, he will tell you to a dime what the General Fund contribution (i.e. a piece of the subsidy) should be. 2.06: Criticizes airlines as getting taxpayer bailout. Well, I agree with him on that, but many forms of public transportation get subsidies (like subways and AMTRAK). He wants GA to be placed into the same category. Ha. Note to Phil: GA is not public transportation. Neither is my car. A subway or train is. 6.40: His disputes those who say that increasing the AV gas tax to 70.1 cents per gallon is "not a major burden" when taking into account the full costs of operating a private plane. He says it is a major burden, but then claims that airlines who charge customers a few bucks in taxes experience no adverse effects from the tax, because only the passengers pay. (This is among the most laughable statements The Destroyer continues to make, one that any economics professor would roll his/her eyes at.) Just more situational logic here. 7.49: now he wants to get the av gas tax increase off the table too. Previously, he complained that such a large increase should have been phased in, and he stated he was open to restructuring the gas tax. Not sure what to make of these varying positions. All in all, a standard performance from the retired TV executive, who still lives in a world of fiction who cannot distinguish between a script and reality. Oh, and by the way, for the AOPA support staff who posted this on the web site, an increase from 19.3 to 70.1 cents is NOT a 366% increase. They should hire a fifth grade math teacher to put up the proper number. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA | G. Sylvester | Piloting | 17 | February 7th 05 03:07 PM |
Jay in AOPA | Ditch | Piloting | 5 | December 7th 04 04:06 AM |
Thank you AOPA! | Marco Rispoli | Piloting | 4 | September 29th 04 05:02 PM |
AOPA | Chris OCallaghan | Soaring | 13 | June 3rd 04 05:05 AM |
AOPA / AFD? | Larry Fransson | Piloting | 7 | November 26th 03 01:34 AM |