![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oops, it won't be flying except if it's an ultralight (unregulated, of
course...but you won't be flying an IFR ultralight...) Scott Scott wrote: you might call your local FSDO and ask them. That should eliminate a lot of the guesswork. If they won't approve it, it won't be flying... Scott |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote in message ... I was really talking more about the installation rules for an IFR GPS. And while there may be FCC rules about me building my transmitter I don't think they would apply to me building a NAV receiver. Yes they do. Any superheterodyne receiver requires Part 15 acceptance. Unless you want to build a crystal set without a local oscillator. Look at the bottom of your crackerbox AM radio at home. {;-) I could be wrong but that isn't the point. The FAA have created a set of rules for use of a GPS receiver that are much more strict than those for a NAV radio that the installation and use of is at least just as complex. They did exactly the same thing for contact lenses back in the mid '60s when they started to become popular. I spent a full DAY in the opthomologist's (sp?) office doing all the required tests. Now it is a simple "do you wear contacts" box on the medical exam form. Oklahoma City = Paranoid City Jim |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The LAST thing you want to do is get your local FSDO involved. Asking them
for advice is like asking a lawyer if you need advice. SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURE you do. Leave your money; leave your daughters; now go home. Jim "Scott" wrote in message ... I understand what you're saying! I am not IFR rated and won't even get into the IFR rules for TSO etc. since I don't know. I guess if you have the desire to know for sure, you might call your local FSDO and ask them. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, that may be so, but (and I'm asking sincerely) doesn't the FSDO (or
I suppose DAR) have to inspect before an airworthiness certificate is issued? If so, wouldn't it be cheaper to ask them first what is required or maybe it is best to just put it in and hope they don't question it? Scott RST Engineering wrote: The LAST thing you want to do is get your local FSDO involved. Asking them for advice is like asking a lawyer if you need advice. SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURE you do. Leave your money; leave your daughters; now go home. Jim "Scott" wrote in message ... I understand what you're saying! I am not IFR rated and won't even get into the IFR rules for TSO etc. since I don't know. I guess if you have the desire to know for sure, you might call your local FSDO and ask them. -- Scott http://corbenflyer.tripod.com/ Gotta Fly or Gonna Die Building RV-4 (Super Slow Build Version) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Val Com 760 TSO Transceiver | aieo | Aviation Marketplace | 8 | January 25th 07 04:38 PM |
FA: 760ch transceiver | EOC | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 27th 05 08:23 PM |
CFI's who use a transceiver or handheld GPS? | BoDEAN | Piloting | 10 | April 9th 04 03:03 AM |
Transceiver | BoDEAN | Products | 0 | April 7th 04 06:08 AM |
WANTED: KX-99 Transceiver | Scott | Soaring | 0 | January 8th 04 07:04 AM |