![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gord Beaman" wrote in message ... Kerryn Offord wrote: " wrote: "RT" wrote: John Smith wrote in message ink.net... Most people can't drive a car and talk on the cell phone at the same time. But it's accepted that they can drive and talk to the pax (including in the back seat) at the same time. Why do I have a problem with this? I don't think that I do, it's not the same thing somehow, something to do with the attention required to decipher the intelligence from the much lower fidelity telephone earpiece and listening to a (probably familiar) human voice a couple of feet away unhampered by electronics. Both talking on a cell phone (hands free is almost as bad as hand held) and talking to passengers are distractors.... I agree, it's not the lack of that hand that's holding the handset that's the big handicap it's that part of the driver's brain that's busied out by the attention that he's paying to the talker on the phone. They make a big time about "hands free" being so much safer..piffle on that I say. Cigarette in the left hand and a thumb hooked through the wheel, while the right hand holds the phone? The thing about talking to a passenger is that they are also in the car... they can (and often do) look at the road conditions and think a bit before talking, they also offer warnings if they see something that the driver doesn't... meanwhile, someone on the other end of the phone.. they have no idea what is going on in the car... (A fellow PhD student wants to examine this very thing....) I think he should, it's a ripe subject and could have far reaching good effects. The human mind is a damned complicated affair and the interaction of thought patterns and coincidental physical actions and decision making in relation to those actions is extremely complicated...when you think about it it's amazing that the human animal is capable of such inter-related thoughts/actions. It is those incomming calls that kill. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:
"Gord Beaman" wrote in message .. . Kerryn Offord wrote: " wrote: "RT" wrote: John Smith wrote in message ink.net... Most people can't drive a car and talk on the cell phone at the same time. But it's accepted that they can drive and talk to the pax (including in the back seat) at the same time. Why do I have a problem with this? I don't think that I do, it's not the same thing somehow, something to do with the attention required to decipher the intelligence from the much lower fidelity telephone earpiece and listening to a (probably familiar) human voice a couple of feet away unhampered by electronics. Both talking on a cell phone (hands free is almost as bad as hand held) and talking to passengers are distractors.... I agree, it's not the lack of that hand that's holding the handset that's the big handicap it's that part of the driver's brain that's busied out by the attention that he's paying to the talker on the phone. They make a big time about "hands free" being so much safer..piffle on that I say. Cigarette in the left hand and a thumb hooked through the wheel, while the right hand holds the phone? The thing about talking to a passenger is that they are also in the car... they can (and often do) look at the road conditions and think a bit before talking, they also offer warnings if they see something that the driver doesn't... meanwhile, someone on the other end of the phone.. they have no idea what is going on in the car... (A fellow PhD student wants to examine this very thing....) I think he should, it's a ripe subject and could have far reaching good effects. The human mind is a damned complicated affair and the interaction of thought patterns and coincidental physical actions and decision making in relation to those actions is extremely complicated...when you think about it it's amazing that the human animal is capable of such inter-related thoughts/actions. It is those incomming calls that kill. I agree that they're likely a little more dangerous than the others due to the fact that they're likely somewhat more mysterious at first al least. -- -Gord. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gord Beaman" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote: "Gord Beaman" wrote in message .. . Kerryn Offord wrote: " wrote: "RT" wrote: John Smith wrote in message ink.net... Most people can't drive a car and talk on the cell phone at the same time. But it's accepted that they can drive and talk to the pax (including in the back seat) at the same time. Why do I have a problem with this? I don't think that I do, it's not the same thing somehow, something to do with the attention required to decipher the intelligence from the much lower fidelity telephone earpiece and listening to a (probably familiar) human voice a couple of feet away unhampered by electronics. Both talking on a cell phone (hands free is almost as bad as hand held) and talking to passengers are distractors.... I agree, it's not the lack of that hand that's holding the handset that's the big handicap it's that part of the driver's brain that's busied out by the attention that he's paying to the talker on the phone. They make a big time about "hands free" being so much safer..piffle on that I say. Cigarette in the left hand and a thumb hooked through the wheel, while the right hand holds the phone? The thing about talking to a passenger is that they are also in the car... they can (and often do) look at the road conditions and think a bit before talking, they also offer warnings if they see something that the driver doesn't... meanwhile, someone on the other end of the phone.. they have no idea what is going on in the car... (A fellow PhD student wants to examine this very thing....) I think he should, it's a ripe subject and could have far reaching good effects. The human mind is a damned complicated affair and the interaction of thought patterns and coincidental physical actions and decision making in relation to those actions is extremely complicated...when you think about it it's amazing that the human animal is capable of such inter-related thoughts/actions. It is those incomming calls that kill. I agree that they're likely a little more dangerous than the others due to the fact that they're likely somewhat more mysterious at first al least. It is a statistically known fact, as telephone revenue is referenced to time. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|