![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Montblack" wrote in message
... ("Felix" wrote) Is this a possible explanation or am I completely wrong here? My take on this crash is: If they could have a do-over ...at the moment they decided to turn around, they would choose (this time) to bust the airspace, and write up a NASA form later. I think they got a little behind the situation, decided NOT to bust ANY of the airspace around them, and things went south from there. Paul-Mont That pretty much sums up all that we really know. The report(s) can be found at http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/query.asp by typing in the registration number N929CD and selecting any or each of the three reports. However, none depict any reconstrucion of the exact flight path--so all that can really be said is that your solution, advanced by many of us at the time, would have worked. Peter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/13/2007 8:36:23 PM, "Montblack" wrote:
I think they got a little behind the situation, decided NOT to bust ANY of the airspace around them, and things went south from there. Literally and figuratively. -- Peter |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Every body I fly with or even just asks me the same question. I have
this simple answer to anyone, especially those who don't know anything about flying... "You're flying along, fat and happy, doesn't matter where or how high, for that matter, and you decide for whatever reason that you want to do a u-turn and go back the way you came. You look out of the window and on the left side, you see a boatload of buildings. You look on the right side, and you see open air. So, which way do you turn ? " Like I said, no discussion about LGA, airspace ownership, radio usage, just simple common sense... Ray Felix wrote: I'm sure this was discussed for a while after it happened...I wanted to bring this up again...I was just reading an article that I came across explaining how Corey Lidle's crash into a Manhattan Building could have happened. Some people say it was mechanical failure, others say it because he flew into a cloud...So i started thinking about it and I came up with this explanation: The east river is a very narrow corridor. Continuing flight north would put him in LaGuardia Airspace. To Avoid the airspace Lidle needed to make a 180 degree turn back. Since the East River is so narrow a turn of 30 or more degrees would probably be needed to avoid flying over Manhattan. Once you bank an airplane over 30 degrees, you would no longer see the tops of any building. Your line of sight would be towards the bottom of the building. He probably didn't even bother looking to the left to see if there are any obstacles before starting the turn. He also probably didn't realize that his rate of turn wasn't quick enough to avoid the building until it was too late. Is this a possible explanation or am I completely wrong here? Felix |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MLBPA Insurance, The Lidle Crash & A Closet Full of Suits | PPL-A (Canada) | Piloting | 5 | May 17th 07 02:25 AM |
Recent C421 crash is related to Cory Lidle | jbskies | Piloting | 5 | December 5th 06 01:48 PM |
More journalistic delirium about the Lidle crash | Greg Farris | Piloting | 3 | November 28th 06 06:07 AM |
Winds A Factor In Lidle Crash | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 72 | November 10th 06 08:43 PM |
Lidle crash: who is wrong? | Blasto | Piloting | 57 | October 20th 06 08:05 AM |