A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Smoke, mirrors and the GBU - 12



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #12  
Old September 2nd 03, 10:25 PM
Xenia Dragon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Simon Robbins" wrote in message ...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

The smoke and atmospheric interference you describe make the laser

deginator
non-operable.


Only in extreme cases. Humidity, mild dust and other airborne particulates
will degrade the laser's performance but not necessarily block it
completely.

You miss the reason for the laser being there in the first place.


No, a high bit rate of modulated binary data is not going to force the
seeker to loose lock if the seeker algorithm is written to handle it. Or
perhaps the technology is a lot less mature than I imagined it to be.

Si



THANKS to all those who took the time to help with my query.
It was good of you. I have since done some persistent
Googling and find that in addition to the country
mentioned in the thread there are other nations, including
China, which have products to defeat laser targeting of their ground
positions. The US military in turn is aware of all countermeasures
to its laser guided bombs and has contracted research on
improvements which will continue to make it difficult for those
countries with only a basic defensive capabiility to oppose
US policy initiatives. As a lay person I only need basic info
on the subject.

Cheers Xenia
  #15  
Old September 3rd 03, 04:09 AM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John R Weiss" wrote in message
et...
"GregD" wrote...

No, they are different. Tarver *invented* Morris Code, back when
he single-handedly (hehe, there's an image for you) designed the
Boeing 777, remember? Tarver's Morris Code consisted of a 3x3
matrix of 'x' and 'o' characters, not the serial stream dots and
dashes of the more common Morse Code.


Further, the 'x' and 'o' characters on one or more matrices could then be
translated into sounds and spaces:


Acousticly coupled DTMF should work just fine.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.