![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Dave Eadsforth
writes Greetings All, Just wanted to say thank you to everyone for all the valuable historical and expert comments - I think I understand the pros and cons very well now. Very much appreciated! Cheers, Dave -- Dave Eadsforth |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A tight turning circle down in the weeds is damn difficut to attack
without hitting the ground yourself. By DIW I mean the defender is flying as low as he can and still stay alive, 25 feet or less. The attacker has his hands full trying to pull lead and keep from slipping below the defender's turning plane. You can find cases of this in BoB records where RAF pilots were down low and had a 109 trapped at six but got out of it by getting even lower. I know a PRANG pilot back in the 70's who got bounced by 2 F14s and kept them from tracking him by going down just above the waves. He was creaking around for a week after pulling 7G for way too long but they ran out of fuel before they ever got 'guns' on him. That was after his flight successfully attacked the Ike by coming in at zero feet in sea clutter. Walt BJ |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Are aircraft cost-effective for defensive purposes? | Chad Irby | Military Aviation | 6 | September 12th 03 01:23 AM |
NACO charts - why have a reference circle? | Bob Gardner | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | September 6th 03 01:15 PM |