![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 16, 9:51 am, rlovinggood wrote:
I'm curious why you're not considering the gas powered CR-V? I have been a Honda person for years, with four Honda motorcycles, my first Accord that ran for 396,000 miles before it was totalled in a wreck and my current Accord that has 201,000 miles on it and remains a great car. If Honda made sailplanes, I would probably be lusting after one all the time. The CR-V is rated to tow "only" 1,500 lbs. Remember how I started this thread: Trailer hitch getting ripped off the car and the trailer most likely weighs more than 1,500 lbs. I'm tired of having to weld up the car where the trailer hitch is attached... Now, after driving the 2000 Accord for a few years, I do like the power of the V-6 over that of a four. Also, it seems that some V-6's give very similar mileage as four cylinder engines. My wife drives a 2006 Hyundai Sonata with a four cylinder and on the same trek as I drive to work, it gets NO BETTER mileage than my six cylinder Accord. From the web page: www.fueleconomy.gov The numbers shown below are the "new" EPA estimates on mileage. Note that the four cylinder CR-V doesn't do much better than any of the V6 vehicles. Since a very high percentage of my driving is highway driving, I tend to look at those figures more than the city or combined numbers. Yes, a four cylinder will work, but for not much, if any, penalty, why not use a V6? Power corrupts and absolute power is pretty neat. 2007 Hyundai Santa Fe 3.3 litre V6 4WD 17 city 19 combined 24 hwy 2007 Toyota RAV4 3.5 litre V6 4WD 19 city 21 combined 26 hwy 2007 Honda CR-V 2.4 litre inline four 4WD 19 city 22 combined 26 hwy 2000 Honda Accord 3.0 litre V6 FWD 18 city 21 combined 25 hwy Ray Lovinggood Carrboro, North Carolina, USA I second the "treading water" approach. A well depreciated Subaru or even (and I'm admittedly biased here) Dodge with a Cummins diesel, until newer smaller diesels start showing up. I'm addicted to owning 3/4 ton pickups. I bought mine (on ebay) with 124,000 miles on it for under $11,000. I'm always amazed at the fuel economy. Empty, I get 19.5 mpg on the highway, 17ish around town. Towing my trailer, 19 highway and 16ish around town. I feel it's about twice as much vehicle and engine than I really need. If I could find a mid size pickup with a 2.5 to 3 liter TD engine (that I could afford) I'd have one. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
rlovinggood wrote:
I'm curious why you're not considering the gas powered CR-V? I have been a Honda person for years, with four Honda motorcycles, my first Accord that ran for 396,000 miles before it was totalled in a wreck and my current Accord that has 201,000 miles on it and remains a great car. If Honda made sailplanes, I would probably be lusting after one all the time. The CR-V is rated to tow "only" 1,500 lbs. Remember how I started this thread: Trailer hitch getting ripped off the car and the trailer most likely weighs more than 1,500 lbs. I'm tired of having to weld up the car where the trailer hitch is attached... Now, after driving the 2000 Accord for a few years, I do like the power of the V-6 over that of a four. Also, it seems that some V-6's give very similar mileage as four cylinder engines. My wife drives a 2006 Hyundai Sonata with a four cylinder and on the same trek as I drive to work, it gets NO BETTER mileage than my six cylinder Accord. From the web page: www.fueleconomy.gov The numbers shown below are the "new" EPA estimates on mileage. Note that the four cylinder CR-V doesn't do much better than any of the V6 vehicles. Since a very high percentage of my driving is highway driving, I tend to look at those figures more than the city or combined numbers. Yes, a four cylinder will work, but for not much, if any, penalty, why not use a V6? Power corrupts and absolute power is pretty neat. 2007 Hyundai Santa Fe 3.3 litre V6 4WD 17 city 19 combined 24 hwy 2007 Toyota RAV4 3.5 litre V6 4WD 19 city 21 combined 26 hwy 2007 Honda CR-V 2.4 litre inline four 4WD 19 city 22 combined 26 hwy 2000 Honda Accord 3.0 litre V6 FWD 18 city 21 combined 25 hwy Ray Lovinggood Carrboro, North Carolina, USA 1500 lb towing capacity, not so good. I checked the Element, it's the same. Wonder if a diesel Rav is on the way... Shawn |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
rlovinggood wrote:
I'm curious why you're not considering the gas powered CR-V? I have been a Honda person for years, with four Honda motorcycles, my first Accord that ran for 396,000 miles before it was totalled in a wreck and my current Accord that has 201,000 miles on it and remains a great car. If Honda made sailplanes, I would probably be lusting after one all the time. Do let me know when you take delivery of your Honda business jet. I'd love a ride in one :-). https://hondajet.honda.com/default.aspx?bhcp=1 Tony V. http://home.comcast.net/~verhulst/SOARING |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 16, 3:57 pm, Tony Verhulst wrote:
rlovinggood wrote: I'm curious why you're not considering the gas powered CR-V? I have been a Honda person for years, with four Honda motorcycles, my first Accord that ran for 396,000 miles before it was totalled in a wreck and my current Accord that has 201,000 miles on it and remains a great car. If Honda made sailplanes, I would probably be lusting after one all the time. Do let me know when you take delivery of your Honda business jet. I'd love a ride in one :-). https://hondajet.honda.com/default.aspx?bhcp=1 Tony V.http://home.comcast.net/~verhulst/SOARING I love hondas as well, have owned several of their cars and motorcycles. I was looking at getting a honda element as a friend said that his towed very well. After driving Jim Staniforth's subaru outback from ely to eureka and back, up and down some big mountains, to retrieve him and an LS-6 in a cobra, decided to try a subaru forester. I'm very happy with the car after a year, I was worried that the little four cylinder engine wouldn't have enough power but it hasn't been an issue. The car tows the LS-6 and now an ASH-26 up and down the mountains out west with no problems. I'm very happy with this car, it's easy to drive, park, and doesn't use too much fuel. As nice as it was, I don't miss my full size chevy pickup. Jim Dingess |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The CR-V's towing capacities are very limited. When I inspected an 08
model a few weeks ago I could not even see how one could get a class 3 hitch on it. 2NO |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The VW Rabbit (current model) works for me. Perfectly stable at 65 mph
(towing a Cobra with Discus inside) and 25 mpg with the trailer. No problem accelerating when going uphill with the trailer. 25,000 miles and nothing has gone wrong, though the car does have various rattles. Hitch assembly attaches to the car's frame. Don't see how there could be any problem there (though there now is a second hitch design available that isn't strong enough for glider towing). The exhaust system does rattle against the hitch assembly, which I have attempted to solve by gluing a thin strip from an old wing skid to the hitch assembly at the point of contact. As another data point -- a local pilot used to tow with a VW Scirocco, and he says it was a great towcar. rlovinggood wrote: The discussion on tow vehicles hits home. I have to replace the trusty Accord with something that has a beefier hitch attachment point. I've managed to rip the hitch off from the bottom of the trunk twice now. Car: 2000 Honda Accord V6 sedan, 201,000 miles. Trailer: 2006 Swan, with fiberglass top. Tongue weight: 170 lbs. Total weight: Not yet weighed, but empty trailer is, according to the manufacturer, 500 kg and the glider (LS1-d)weighs around 550 lbs, I think. I would imagine the total trailer weighs about 1,700 lbs. I hope to weigh it soon. The first hitch attached with three bolts to the bottom of the Honda trunk. The sheet metal measures "Oh Too Thin" I found out the hard way. I think the trunk started tearing when the trailer hitch wouldn't release from the knob as I was cranking the trailer hitch up off of the knob and I was lifting the rear end of the car. Why was the knob sticking? Because, unknown to me at the time, the Al-Ko hitch has a little rubber cover that provides a cushion for the trailer tongue when you back your car's bumper into it. It prevents the trailer tongue from scratching your bumper. Well, a bit of the rubber would get caught on the knob when hooking up the trailer and when I tried to release, I would end up jacking up the rear of the car a bit and stomp on the trailer hitch to release it. I thought it was just a tight connection. Turns out the car wasn't made for this abuse. Duh. A body shop welded up the trunk and I found another hitch design. This one bolted to the "frame" in two points and also to the "tie down" or "tow" loop that is right over the center of the hitch. The first hitch bolted here, too. But I've managed to tear that out too. I think I did that when I bottomed out recently. That is, when I drove the car out of a gravel driveway onto a road and the trailer hitch hit the ground. I suppose that's when the bottom of the trunk cracked around the central hitch attachment point. Damn. So now, I need a vehicle that I can afford to buy, and afford to commute 80 miles per day to work. Oil just hit US$88 per barrel. I try to ride a bus to work as often as I can, but sometimes, I still drive. So, no, I'm not buying a Ford F-150 or Chevy pickup truck. I'm not getting an Avalanche or Ford Excursion. In fact, I'm not getting a Ford of anything. I've had two and they both lived up to the name of "Found on the Road Dead." I wish Honda had their turbo diesel here in America in the CR-V. Sigh. So, I think I've narrowed my search to the current Toyota RAV4 with V6 and the current Hyundai Santa Fe with V6. Both seem to have good reviews in media that I have found. The plus for the RAV4 is that it is a Toyota. It also gets about the same mileage as my Accord, even with all wheel drive and 69 more horsepower! The Hyundai gets excellent reviews on safety, but mileage isn't as good as the RAV4. Both are rated to tow 2,000 lbs without the trailer towing package. And both can tow 3,500 lbs with the tow package. Which shall it be? I don't know, the story isn't over yet. But if anyone wants a good hitch for a 2000 Accord (probably fit any sixth generation Accord), send me a note. Should be great for a bicycle rack. Ray Lovinggood Carrboro, North Carolina, USA Have trailer and glider, but no tow vehicle |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() So, I think I've narrowed my search to the current Toyota RAV4 with V6 The RAV 4 is in PERMANENT four wheel drive. I owned one for a bit, and the fuel consumption was horrendous. And that was a 2 liter 4 cylinder example so God knows what the six will be like. I'd ask some searching questions before purchase. Alistair Wright Scotland. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tony,
While I'm not in the market for a powered aircraft, Honda or other make, I do live somewhat close to the place where they will be assembled: Burlington, North Carolina. In fact, Burlington is a common turnpoint for us when we fly our 300 km FAI triangle around the RDU Class C airspace. This evening as I got off the bus coming back from work, I saw a Subaru Forester in the park and ride parking lot with a 'For Sale' sign on it. 2002 'S' model with 72,000 miles. Asking $10k or best offer. Normally aspirated four banger with four speed auto tranny. Has a trailer hitch on it. Ray At 23:00 16 October 2007, Tony Verhulst wrote: rlovinggood wrote: I'm curious why you're not considering the gas powered CR-V? I have been a Honda person for years, with four Honda motorcycles, my first Accord that ran for 396,000 miles before it was totalled in a wreck and my current Accord that has 201,000 miles on it and remains a great car. If Honda made sailplanes, I would probably be lusting after one all the time. Do let me know when you take delivery of your Honda business jet. I'd love a ride in one :-). https://hondajet.honda.com/default.aspx?bhcp=1 Tony V. http://home.comcast.net/~verhulst/SOARING |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://world.honda.com/news/2004/4040506.html
The Honda Diesel will be the car to own. Incredible. achieved up to 92 MPG to boot. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of the cars got 92 MPG. They don't mention what the other one got.
Mike Schumann "tommytoyz" wrote in message oups.com... http://world.honda.com/news/2004/4040506.html The Honda Diesel will be the car to own. Incredible. achieved up to 92 MPG to boot. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Saturn V Vehicle for the Apollo 4 Mission in the Vehicle Assembly Building 6754387.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 12th 07 01:38 AM |
license woes | gen | Soaring | 17 | November 11th 06 04:50 PM |
Still more Airbus woes (1) | john smith | Piloting | 11 | June 17th 06 09:42 PM |
Volkslogger woes | Dan Rihn | Soaring | 10 | March 25th 04 03:10 PM |
Cambridge 302 DDV woes - Help me PLEASE !!! | Mike Borgelt | Soaring | 7 | October 11th 03 10:44 AM |