![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phil wrote:
I think it's pretty likely they deactivated it because they had a replacement that was even better. I was under the impression that improvements in recon by satellite made use of the SR-71 obsolete. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Logajan" wrote in message .. . Phil wrote: I think it's pretty likely they deactivated it because they had a replacement that was even better. I was under the impression that improvements in recon by satellite made use of the SR-71 obsolete. That's what they say. I'm not saying he is right, or is wrong, but what he says does make sense. How long did the SR-71 exist, before anyone knew about it? What he is hinting at is probably the Aurora. You know, the one that leaves donut shaped con trails? -- Jim in NC |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Morgans" wrote in message ... I'm not saying he is right, or is wrong, but what he says does make sense. How long did the SR-71 exist, before anyone knew about it? Not very long. I remember reading an article about it in about 1970, and it wasn't news then. IIRC, the SR-71 was "outed" early as a peace keeping effort. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:42:31 -0500, "Maxwell" wrote:
"Morgans" wrote in message ... I'm not saying he is right, or is wrong, but what he says does make sense. How long did the SR-71 exist, before anyone knew about it? Not very long. I remember reading an article about it in about 1970, and it wasn't news then. IIRC, the SR-71 was "outed" early as a peace keeping effort. An article I read a while back indicated that "outing" the Blackbird was a political move by Johnson; he was under increasing pressure about Vietnam, and unveiled the RS-71 as a distraction. Yes, *RS*-71. Johnson transposed the letters, and the Air Force had to call it "SR" forever after.... (RS: Reconnaissance Strike) Ron Wanttaja |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What he is hinting at is probably the Aurora. You know, the one that leaves
donut shaped con trails? Bill Fox, the man who donated everything for our awesome "Blackbird Suite", has confirmed that there was, indeed, an Aurora. He won't say anything more about it. (He worked at the Skunkworks for over 30 years, and ran the famous "Area 51" for a couple of years.) BTW: Bill says we lost nearly half of the SR-71s ever built, none to enemy fire. It was a VERY dangerous bird to fly. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Wanttaja wrote:
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:42:31 -0500, "Maxwell" wrote: "Morgans" wrote in message ... I'm not saying he is right, or is wrong, but what he says does make sense. How long did the SR-71 exist, before anyone knew about it? Not very long. I remember reading an article about it in about 1970, and it wasn't news then. IIRC, the SR-71 was "outed" early as a peace keeping effort. An article I read a while back indicated that "outing" the Blackbird was a political move by Johnson; he was under increasing pressure about Vietnam, and unveiled the RS-71 as a distraction. Yes, *RS*-71. Johnson transposed the letters, and the Air Force had to call it "SR" forever after.... (RS: Reconnaissance Strike) Ron Wanttaja In the late 60's I was in air defense in Korea. Every once in a while we would track (well, not really, it was going too fast for a track lock) something that was going at "impossible" speeds for the time, almost always either coming in from the Pacific and up across North Korea or leaving North Korea and heading out to the Pacific. While on mid tour leave, I was standing by the runway at Kadena AFB killing time until my ride to the States watching airplanes when the ground started shaking and there was this hellacious noise. I looked down at the end of the runway (I was about midfield) and saw this little black spec getting bigger and bigger until it was almost in front of me, at which point it basically stood on it's tail and disappeared in the sky within a few seconds. There was a guy standing behind me; I turned to him and said "Did you see that!". I then noticed he was an AP and he said "Did I see what?" I got the drift real quick and changed the subject. A few years later the existence of the SR-71 was acknowledged and I put two and two together. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Big John writes:
Although the pilot takes off and lands the airplane manually, the navigation system is accurate enough to put the airplane on the runway in zero-zero conditions after flying nonstop from Californiato Iraqand return with four inflight refuelings. I'm not so sure about that. The ANS was accurate to within half a mile or so, as I recall. It wasn't good enough for a landing in zero visibility. Of course, the published accuracy for the ANS could be (dramatically) understated. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:09:55 -0700, Jay Honeck wrote:
has confirmed that there was, indeed, an Aurora. Must be true... it's on the internet. :-) http://wave.prohosting.com/aurora85/images/montana.html -- Dallas |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Big John writes: Although the pilot takes off and lands the airplane manually, the navigation system is accurate enough to put the airplane on the runway in zero-zero conditions after flying nonstop from Californiato Iraqand return with four inflight refuelings. I'm not so sure about that. The ANS was accurate to within half a mile or so, as I recall. It wasn't good enough for a landing in zero visibility. Of course, the published accuracy for the ANS could be (dramatically) understated. As could be your understanding of anything that deals with real flight. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Big John writes: Although the pilot takes off and lands the airplane manually, the navigation system is accurate enough to put the airplane on the runway in zero-zero conditions after flying nonstop from Californiato Iraqand return with four inflight refuelings. I'm not so sure about that. The ANS was accurate to within half a mile or so, as I recall. How the **** would you know, idiot boi? It wasn't good enough for a landing in zero visibility. Of course, the published accuracy for the ANS could be (dramatically) understated. Ya think? Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|