![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JGalban via AviationKB.com u32749@uwe wrote:
wrote: And since I've never seen a 172 where the VSI didn't wiggle when I turned the alternate on and off, I would want to know why it didn't before I flew it. On the ground, there doesn't always have to be a significant difference between cabin air pressure and outside pressure. I'd recommend trying the check in flight. If you don't see any difference there, then you've got a leak in the static system. Correct me if I'm wrong here, but isn't a preflight supposed to be done before you take off? And one more time... Since I've never seen a 172 where the VSI didn't wiggle when I turned the alternate on and off on the ground, I would want to know why it didn't before I flew it. begin speculation Now it could be that after some serial number Cessna changed something and the later models don't do that, and that would be OK as long as I have something at least quasi offical to tell me that. end speculation -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
begin speculation Now it could be that after some serial number Cessna changed something and the later models don't do that, and that would be OK as long as I have something at least quasi offical to tell me that. end speculation Do you have something quasi official that tells you the VSI must wiggle when alt static is checked on the ground? If so, then your question would appear to be answered. Seriously, I suspect that the 172 you're talking about probably does have a static leak into the cabin. If you want to verify that in order to get it fixed, flipping to the alt static at speed will be most convincing to maintenance personnel. Another way to check for a cabin static leak is to open a window (if allowed) in flight. If your VSI, airspeed and altimeter needles jump, you've got a leak in the cabin. On the ground, some aircraft do not experience a perceptable indication due to the location of the exterior static port. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) -- Message posted via http://www.aviationkb.com |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 1, 12:58 am, wrote:
I was preparing to fly a cessna 172SP the other day and as I usually do I pulled the alt.static expecting a small wiggle in the gauges. And got nothing. This was the first time I i got no response from the gauges. I was told by somebody at the front desk this was common and that many of the 172's show no movement at all. But.. if this is so.. how can I be certain the alt.static would work when I needed it. Thanks in advance. I have seen some airplanes show a small wiggle, and some that don't when the static port is turned on or off. There is no easy way to positively verify that your alternate static is working. If you are up to it, you could suck on the static port and ask someone to verify whether the VSI is showing a climb. Then repeat with the alt static open. The latter should not show a climb. Or get a suction for this purpose. Just a thought. I have never done it this way. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JGalban via AviationKB.com u32749@uwe wrote:
wrote: begin speculation Now it could be that after some serial number Cessna changed something and the later models don't do that, and that would be OK as long as I have something at least quasi offical to tell me that. end speculation Do you have something quasi official that tells you the VSI must wiggle when alt static is checked on the ground? If so, then your question would appear to be answered. Every CFI I had while a student said to do it and every 172 I've ever flown does it. Specifically, at the beginning of the preflight walk around, after ensuring the master is off, pull the alternate static control out, then shove it in to make sure it is off; the VSI should wiggle. That's while standing in the open door. Seriously, I suspect that the 172 you're talking about probably does have a static leak into the cabin. I am not the one that posed the original question nor have I flown a 172 newer than a P model. If you want to verify that in order to get it fixed, flipping to the alt static at speed will be most convincing to maintenance personnel. Another way to check for a cabin static leak is to open a window (if allowed) in flight. If your VSI, airspeed and altimeter needles jump, you've got a leak in the cabin. On the ground, some aircraft do not experience a perceptable indication due to the location of the exterior static port. Maybe, but the original poster was talking specifically about a 172. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:05:02 GMT, wrote:
JGalban via AviationKB.com u32749@uwe wrote: wrote: begin speculation Now it could be that after some serial number Cessna changed something and the later models don't do that, and that would be OK as long as I have something at least quasi offical to tell me that. end speculation Do you have something quasi official that tells you the VSI must wiggle when alt static is checked on the ground? If so, then your question would appear to be answered. Every CFI I had while a student said to do it and every 172 I've ever flown does it. Specifically, at the beginning of the preflight walk around, after ensuring the master is off, pull the alternate static control out, then shove it in to make sure it is off; the VSI should wiggle. That's while standing in the open door. Same for every 172 and 182 I've flown. Isn't the action of actuating the flaper in the selector box (or t or whatever it is that it's moving) creating a little pressure wave which is what makes the needles move? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Clark wrote:
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:05:02 GMT, wrote: JGalban via AviationKB.com u32749@uwe wrote: wrote: begin speculation Now it could be that after some serial number Cessna changed something and the later models don't do that, and that would be OK as long as I have something at least quasi offical to tell me that. end speculation Do you have something quasi official that tells you the VSI must wiggle when alt static is checked on the ground? If so, then your question would appear to be answered. Every CFI I had while a student said to do it and every 172 I've ever flown does it. Specifically, at the beginning of the preflight walk around, after ensuring the master is off, pull the alternate static control out, then shove it in to make sure it is off; the VSI should wiggle. That's while standing in the open door. Same for every 172 and 182 I've flown. Isn't the action of actuating the flaper in the selector box (or t or whatever it is that it's moving) creating a little pressure wave which is what makes the needles move? That's what I was told and that if the systems working, the needle bounces one way when opened and the other when closed. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 2, 3:55 pm, Andrew Sarangan wrote:
On Nov 1, 12:58 am, wrote: I was preparing to fly a cessna 172SP the other day and as I usually do I pulled the alt.static expecting a small wiggle in the gauges. And got nothing. This was the first time I i got no response from the gauges. I was told by somebody at the front desk this was common and that many of the 172's show no movement at all. But.. if this is so.. how can I be certain the alt.static would work when I needed it. Thanks in advance. I have seen some airplanes show a small wiggle, and some that don't when the static port is turned on or off. There is no easy way to positively verify that your alternate static is working. If you are up to it, you could suck on the static port and ask someone to verify whether the VSI is showing a climb. Then repeat with the alt static open. The latter should not show a climb. Or get a suction for this purpose. Just a thought. I have never done it this way. To clarify i have flown - rented - this aircraft a lot and it always wiggled. The aircraft is a 172SP. I would not cancel a VFR flight in the area for the lack of alt.static, but as my CFI said - I asked him this question too - IFR would be a different story. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-11-02 15:55:56 -0700, Andrew Sarangan said:
On Nov 1, 12:58 am, wrote: I was preparing to fly a cessna 172SP the other day and as I usually do I pulled the alt.static expecting a small wiggle in the gauges. And got nothing. This was the first time I i got no response from the gauges. I was told by somebody at the front desk this was common and that many of the 172's show no movement at all. But.. if this is so.. how can I be certain the alt.static would work when I needed it. Thanks in advance. I have seen some airplanes show a small wiggle, and some that don't when the static port is turned on or off. There is no easy way to positively verify that your alternate static is working. If you are up to it, you could suck on the static port and ask someone to verify whether the VSI is showing a climb. Then repeat with the alt static open. The latter should not show a climb. Or get a suction for this purpose. Just a thought. I have never done it this way. You don't want to, either. I have had avionics guys tell me that this can damage the instruments. -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Static Discharge | gman | Piloting | 12 | March 24th 07 07:56 PM |
KX-155 static | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 3 | September 13th 06 03:40 AM |
KX-155 static | Robert M. Gary | Owning | 4 | September 13th 06 03:40 AM |
IFR static discharge | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | April 2nd 06 08:06 PM |
static wicks | keepitrunning | Home Built | 6 | January 1st 06 01:01 AM |