![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone remember......... The missile will make the internal gun and the
dog fight obsolete? Fighters will kill thier targets at BVR and never see them? Modern submarines with missiles make surface ships obsolete? Modern man portable anti tank missiles make the tank obsolete? Clearly UAVs have an important and increasing role especially in military roles but there will always be a need to have a pilot on station somewhere who can actually see what is going on with his own eyes. John Dupre' "These things are here to stay and they are proliferating. We'll see them on every runway of every airport doing patrols and day-to-day routine tasks." Some are even predicting that the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter will be the last manned fighter. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And what about "the longbow will never defeat armor" no, wait . . .
Sorry dude. Smokeless powder and cased cartrdges did indeed replace black powder and minie balls. Technology has a way of surprising us, after all. What similar disadvantage(s) do UCAVS poseess (like each of your examples clearly did at their introduction) to limit their application? Moral disadvantages? Legal disadvantages? The technical limitations are falling away very quickly. Steve Swartz "JDupre5762" wrote in message ... Does anyone remember......... The missile will make the internal gun and the dog fight obsolete? Fighters will kill thier targets at BVR and never see them? Modern submarines with missiles make surface ships obsolete? Modern man portable anti tank missiles make the tank obsolete? Clearly UAVs have an important and increasing role especially in military roles but there will always be a need to have a pilot on station somewhere who can actually see what is going on with his own eyes. John Dupre' "These things are here to stay and they are proliferating. We'll see them on every runway of every airport doing patrols and day-to-day routine tasks." Some are even predicting that the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter will be the last manned fighter. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JDupre5762" wrote Does anyone remember......... The missile will make the internal gun and the dog fight obsolete? Fighters will kill thier targets at BVR and never see them? Modern submarines with missiles make surface ships obsolete? Modern man portable anti tank missiles make the tank obsolete? Clearly UAVs have an important and increasing role especially in military roles but there will always be a need to have a pilot on station somewhere who can actually see what is going on with his own eyes. "The bomber will always get through"? How about the cavalry? UAVs are pretty obviously the platform of choice for sensors in the recon role. They have a big role to play in SEAD but are unlikely to do autonomous targeting until a lot more experience is available. The only reason they can't do autonomous air to air is because our pilots will have no desire to share the sky with self-targeting AAMs. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great point, Paul, on the main limitation to the use of UCAVs in the A-A
mode is fear of "blue on blue" losses. Maybe there will be some role for manned vehicles (or remotely piloted vehicles) in some A-G applications where the advantages of having a robot pilot aren't so great. However, the advantages of lighter, leaner, cheaper, more lethal, less risk will be a powerful reason for getting the wet bags of protein out of the loop quickly. Steve Swartz "Paul F Austin" wrote in message .. . "JDupre5762" wrote Does anyone remember......... The missile will make the internal gun and the dog fight obsolete? Fighters will kill thier targets at BVR and never see them? Modern submarines with missiles make surface ships obsolete? Modern man portable anti tank missiles make the tank obsolete? Clearly UAVs have an important and increasing role especially in military roles but there will always be a need to have a pilot on station somewhere who can actually see what is going on with his own eyes. "The bomber will always get through"? How about the cavalry? UAVs are pretty obviously the platform of choice for sensors in the recon role. They have a big role to play in SEAD but are unlikely to do autonomous targeting until a lot more experience is available. The only reason they can't do autonomous air to air is because our pilots will have no desire to share the sky with self-targeting AAMs. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Future of Glass Goose? | geo | Home Built | 16 | May 2nd 04 10:37 PM |
100 years of unmanned flight. | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | November 20th 03 11:46 PM |
Joint Unmanned Combat Air Systems | buf3 | Military Aviation | 0 | November 5th 03 10:31 AM |
Air Force Academy Introduces Sweeping Changes, Looks to Future | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 1 | October 8th 03 07:40 PM |
Pitch for unmanned flights could come by year's end | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 20th 03 04:12 AM |