![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hawkeye wrote:
It is a tricycle geared aircraft Dan...the question is...where is the nose gear! "Just called shipping, it'll be here on Monday" -- Cheers Dave Kearton |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, Hawkeye writes On Feb 25, 4:24 pm, Cubdriver usenet AT danford DOT net wrote: Here is a photo on Wiki that shows how the outer wing floats (pontoons) can swing up, so that the pontoon becomes the wingtip. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...K_RNZAF_Catali... That has got to be the case with your photo. A larger question is: where's the tail wheel? Blue skies! -- Dan Ford On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:30:54 -0800 (PST), William Hung wrote: http://www.sa-transport.co.za/aircra...by-5a_ra98.JPG OK, I've seen pictures of PBYs with; 1. All three gears down and the outer potoons down, 2. All gears down, potoons up, 3. Gears up, potoons down, 4. and now the above picture with only the main gears down, but nose wheel still tucked in and pontoons still up or maybe no pontoons. My question are; are the gears controlled individually, are the pontoons controlled separately, are the font and main gears controlled separately also? If so, why? Wil Blue skies! -- Dan Ford Claire Chennault and His American Volunteers, 1941-1942 new from HarperCollinswww.FlyingTigersBook.com It is a tricycle geared aircraft Dan...the question is...where is the nose gear! No, it isn't. It's a PBY-5, not a PBY-5A. The wheels alongside the fuselage are beaching gear, not landing gear. No mainwheels, no nose gear. Comparisons he http://www.catalina.org.nz/what%20is%20a%20PBY.htm The photo of the PBY-2 shows the beaching gear. -- Peter Ying tong iddle-i po! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Twydell wrote:
It is a tricycle geared aircraft Dan...the question is...where is the nose gear! No, it isn't. It's a PBY-5, not a PBY-5A. The wheels alongside the fuselage are beaching gear, not landing gear. No mainwheels, no nose gear. Comparisons he http://www.catalina.org.nz/what%20is%20a%20PBY.htm The photo of the PBY-2 shows the beaching gear. Well, I just learned something I didn't know: that all the models including the PBY-5 were flying boats and that the first amphibian models started with the PBY-5A model. This newsgroup can be an amazing resource, when we aren't fighting over politics. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Peter Twydell wrote: In message , Hawkeye writes On Feb 25, 4:24 pm, Cubdriver usenet AT danford DOT net wrote: Here is a photo on Wiki that shows how the outer wing floats (pontoons) can swing up, so that the pontoon becomes the wingtip. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...K_RNZAF_Catali... That has got to be the case with your photo. A larger question is: where's the tail wheel? Blue skies! -- Dan Ford On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:30:54 -0800 (PST), William Hung wrote: http://www.sa-transport.co.za/aircra...by-5a_ra98.JPG OK, I've seen pictures of PBYs with; 1. All three gears down and the outer potoons down, 2. All gears down, potoons up, 3. Gears up, potoons down, 4. and now the above picture with only the main gears down, but nose wheel still tucked in and pontoons still up or maybe no pontoons. My question are; are the gears controlled individually, are the pontoons controlled separately, are the font and main gears controlled separately also? If so, why? Wil Blue skies! -- Dan Ford Claire Chennault and His American Volunteers, 1941-1942 new from HarperCollinswww.FlyingTigersBook.com It is a tricycle geared aircraft Dan...the question is...where is the nose gear! No, it isn't. It's a PBY-5, not a PBY-5A. The wheels alongside the fuselage are beaching gear, not landing gear. No mainwheels, no nose gear. Comparisons he http://www.catalina.org.nz/what%20is%20a%20PBY.htm The photo of the PBY-2 shows the beaching gear. Looks like a 5a to me, you can see the outline of the still closed nosewheel door. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 25, 10:56*pm, Dale wrote:
In article , *Peter Twydell wrote: In message , Hawkeye writes On Feb 25, 4:24 pm, Cubdriver usenet AT danford DOT net wrote: Here is a photo on Wiki that shows how the outer wing floats (pontoons) can swing up, so that *the pontoon becomes the wingtip. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...K_RNZAF_Catali.... That has got to be the case with your photo. A larger question is: where's the tail wheel? *Blue skies! -- Dan Ford On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:30:54 -0800 (PST), William Hung wrote: http://www.sa-transport.co.za/aircra...y-5a_ra98..JPG OK, I've seen pictures of PBYs with; 1. All three gears down and the outer potoons down, 2. All gears down, potoons up, 3. Gears up, potoons down, 4. and now the above picture with only the main gears down, but nose wheel still tucked in and pontoons still up or maybe no pontoons. My question are; are the gears controlled individually, are the pontoons controlled separately, are the font and main gears controlled separately also? *If so, why? Wil Blue skies! -- Dan Ford Claire Chennault and His American Volunteers, 1941-1942 new from HarperCollinswww.FlyingTigersBook.com It is a tricycle geared aircraft Dan...the question is...where is the nose gear! No, it isn't. It's a PBY-5, not a PBY-5A. The wheels alongside the fuselage are beaching gear, not landing gear. No mainwheels, no nose gear. Comparisons he http://www.catalina.org.nz/what%20is%20a%20PBY.htm The photo of the PBY-2 shows the beaching gear. Looks like a 5a to me, you can see the outline of the still closed nosewheel door.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Peter's right, Dale. There's no place to retract those "main wheels" and it is sitting tail heavy on a stand. Not to mention the older style tail. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 25, 5:24*pm, Cubdriver usenet AT danford DOT net wrote:
Here is a photo on Wiki that shows how the outer wing floats (pontoons) can swing up, so that *the pontoon becomes the wingtip. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...K_RNZAF_Catali... That has got to be the case with your photo. A larger question is: where's the tail wheel? *Blue skies! -- Dan Ford On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:30:54 -0800 (PST), William Hung wrote: http://www.sa-transport.co.za/aircra...by-5a_ra98.JPG OK, I've seen pictures of PBYs with; 1. All three gears down and the outer potoons down, 2. All gears down, potoons up, 3. Gears up, potoons down, 4. and now the above picture with only the main gears down, but nose wheel still tucked in and pontoons still up or maybe no pontoons. My question are; are the gears controlled individually, are the pontoons controlled separately, are the font and main gears controlled separately also? *If so, why? Wil Blue skies! -- Dan Ford Claire Chennault and His American Volunteers, 1941-1942 new from HarperCollinswww.FlyingTigersBook.com- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well, since you have posted this picture and Peter Twydell has pointed out that what we are looking at is a beaching gear and nt a landing gear(tail heavy and no accomadation for retraction), I've learned a lot about the PBY. To answer your question, the two little wheels about five feet south of the two gentleman's legs would be the "tail wheels(for beaching)" Now, only if I can hit the big one. The PBY would definitely be my flying ATV. Wil |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I doubt that it would be possible for a Catalina to be able to take
off with the beaching wheels, They were not made for that kind of speed on land. In fact, in the water you'd never get up enough speed either, it would be like dragging two anchors. Even the information on the picture states it is a -5A and can be confirmed by running the registration number through the FAA database. The shadow on the picture obscures the outline of the wheel well on the side of the aircraft, the wheel was exposed when retracted, only the strut was covered by doors, much the same as other aircraft such as the Goose and Albatross. The reason for the creation of an amphibian seaplane was that being strictly a seaplane meant limiting its areas of operations. Many locations in the world do not have or would it be feasible to create beaching facilities. Having to haul the beaching gear and crews was also unpractical. The amphibian could use inland runways to stop for/ deliver fuel/supplies. Remember the more time spent in salt water the greater risk for corrosion which adds to operational maintenance. Its nice to be able to land on water when needed but it has its drawbacks too. When Kermit Weeks brought his Sunderland from the UK to the US, he had to provide for the logistics of landing on bodies of water large enough which also had good water surface conditions plus access to refueling facilities capable of supporting such a large aircraft at each stop of the journey. Had he had an emergency, he might not been able to find a spot with suitable water conditions...ever been in a small boat in rough water. Its harder in an airplane! Fortunately the Sunderland made the trek stopping and over wintering in Oshkosh until the pond/lake at his new Florida facility was ready for its arrival. They installed the beaching gear and parked it at a boat storage area in a local marina. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 27, 12:58*pm, Hawkeye wrote:
I doubt that it would be possible for a Catalina to be able to take off with the beaching wheels, They were not made for that kind of speed on land. In fact, in the water you'd never get up enough speed either, it would be like dragging two anchors. Even the information on the picture states it is a -5A and can be confirmed by running the registration number through the FAA database. The shadow on the picture obscures the outline of the wheel well on the side of the aircraft, the wheel was exposed when retracted, only the strut was covered by doors, much the same as other aircraft such as the Goose and Albatross. The reason for the creation of an amphibian seaplane was that being strictly a seaplane meant limiting its areas of operations. Many locations in the world do not have or would it be feasible to create beaching facilities. Having to haul the beaching gear and crews was also unpractical. The amphibian could use inland runways to stop for/ deliver fuel/supplies. Remember the more time spent in salt water the greater risk for corrosion which adds to operational maintenance. Its nice to be able to land on water when needed but it has its drawbacks too. When Kermit Weeks brought his Sunderland from the UK to the US, he had to provide for the logistics of landing on bodies of water large enough which also had good water surface conditions plus access to refueling facilities capable of supporting such a large aircraft at each stop of the journey. Had he had an emergency, he might not been able to find a spot with suitable water conditions...ever been in a small boat in rough water. Its harder in an airplane! Fortunately the Sunderland made the trek stopping and over wintering in Oshkosh until the pond/lake at his new Florida facility was ready for its arrival. They installed the beaching gear and parked it at a boat storage area in a local marina. Cool... Yeah amphibian would be the way to go. Wil |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|