![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 4:40*pm, Marty Shapiro
wrote: Dan wrote in news:8e803d10-c44e-44da-bf45- : On Feb 20, 5:26*am, Denny wrote: Three years ago my mechanic/fbo put a ton of money into an Aztec, hired a pilot, hired a firm to create the books, had the FAA in on 3 different trips inspecting the plane, the office, the books, taking the pilot for a check ride, yadda, yadda... Then once approved to operate 135 he began bidding for jobs... He found that the competition was playing hardball, even running a Learjet on jobs for less than he was willing to do with the Aztec, they often bid jobs for barely more than their fuel costs apparently losing money to establish rapport with the shipper... The competitors took jobs where they would be deadheading back after the run and still underbid him, plus they beat him to the punch by taking the run a half day sooner because he was still trying to find cargo for both directions... *In the end he went belly up... If you are going to succeed you will do most of the flying yourself, you will need to be an A&P to hold your maintenance costs down, you will be ready to live out of the airplane yes, sleep in it for a week at a time as you hopscotch across the country taking cargo from a to b, then deadheading to c for a run to d, and so on, you will likely have to get by with only insurance for for PL & PD and take the chance you won't destroy the plane which means your family will have to front the money for the plane instead of a bank loan ... Other than that, it should be a piece of cake! denny Wow! That sounds like quite a nightmare. *Apparently aviation and successful entrepreneurialism do NOT go hand in hand. You paint a picture so bleak (and it might well be true) that it makes me wonder why anyone goes into aviation. I have a good paying job now, but I'd like to do something more fun when I get to a point in my life I can work and not be concerned with making top dollar (i.e. 10-20 years out). *I'm trying to plan out how I might prepare for doing something in aviation. Currently, when thinking about what I'd like to do when I "retire" I think I'd like to fly a lot. *However, it is expensive so it would be better to get paid to do it rather than spend big money on a hobby. I'm not sure the CFI route is for me. *I prefer cross country flights with a definate destination. *--Dan I read several years ago that the combined record of all airlines since day one of commercial aviation shows a net loss. *As they say the only way to become a millionaire in aviation is to start with a few billion. -- Marty Shapiro Silicon Rallye Inc. (remove SPAMNOT to email me)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Somehow Southwest and Netjets are doing pretty good though, so with good management it should be possible to make money. Not that I claim to have the magic bullet of course. --Dan |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 4:02*pm, Dan wrote:
On Feb 20, 4:40*pm, Marty Shapiro wrote: Dan wrote in news:8e803d10-c44e-44da-bf45- : On Feb 20, 5:26*am, Denny wrote: Three years ago my mechanic/fbo put a ton of money into an Aztec, hired a pilot, hired a firm to create the books, had the FAA in on 3 different trips inspecting the plane, the office, the books, taking the pilot for a check ride, yadda, yadda... Then once approved to operate 135 he began bidding for jobs... He found that the competition was playing hardball, even running a Learjet on jobs for less than he was willing to do with the Aztec, they often bid jobs for barely more than their fuel costs apparently losing money to establish rapport with the shipper... The competitors took jobs where they would be deadheading back after the run and still underbid him, plus they beat him to the punch by taking the run a half day sooner because he was still trying to find cargo for both directions... *In the end he went belly up... If you are going to succeed you will do most of the flying yourself, you will need to be an A&P to hold your maintenance costs down, you will be ready to live out of the airplane yes, sleep in it for a week at a time as you hopscotch across the country taking cargo from a to b, then deadheading to c for a run to d, and so on, you will likely have to get by with only insurance for for PL & PD and take the chance you won't destroy the plane which means your family will have to front the money for the plane instead of a bank loan ... Other than that, it should be a piece of cake! denny Wow! That sounds like quite a nightmare. *Apparently aviation and successful entrepreneurialism do NOT go hand in hand. You paint a picture so bleak (and it might well be true) that it makes me wonder why anyone goes into aviation. I have a good paying job now, but I'd like to do something more fun when I get to a point in my life I can work and not be concerned with making top dollar (i.e. 10-20 years out). *I'm trying to plan out how I might prepare for doing something in aviation. Currently, when thinking about what I'd like to do when I "retire" I think I'd like to fly a lot. *However, it is expensive so it would be better to get paid to do it rather than spend big money on a hobby. I'm not sure the CFI route is for me. *I prefer cross country flights with a definate destination. *--Dan I read several years ago that the combined record of all airlines since day one of commercial aviation shows a net loss. *As they say the only way to become a millionaire in aviation is to start with a few billion. -- Marty Shapiro Silicon Rallye Inc. (remove SPAMNOT to email me)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Somehow Southwest and Netjets are doing pretty good though, so with good management it should be possible to make money. Not that I claim to have the magic bullet of course. Interesting that Southwest also doesn't have a defined benefit retirement plan, and instead has a 401K like the rest of us. I'm sure that helps. -Robert |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:46:03 -0800 (PST), "Robert M. Gary"
wrote in : On Feb 20, 1:40*pm, Larry Dighera wrote: On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:37:49 -0800 (PST), Dan wrote in : Currently, when thinking about what I'd like to do when I "retire" I think I'd like to fly a lot. *However, it is expensive so it would be better to get paid to do it rather than spend big money on a hobby. If your motivation is revenue generation, consider real estate investment. *If you start buying foreclosures, and put enough equity in them so that the rental income makes the mortgage payment, you will be able to leverage your equity investment's appreciation by something like 80%. * What about your equity? Doesn't it deserve a return too? Huh? That's the whole point. Let's use $100,000 as the home price. If the real estate appreciates at 10% annually, with a 20% down payment (the equity), you are able to realize a gain of, not 10% of $20,000 ($2,000), but 10% of $100,000 ($10,000) annually. You could put it in eTrade savings account and get 4% FDIC insured so why put it into real-estate hoping to just get your payment out of it?? For the appreciation in property value. The rent payment just covers your costs (approximately) over the life of the investment. Real estate goes up and down, but over the long run, .... With the rate of population growth worldwide, I don't see how it can miss. The only true downside is the lack of liquidity, but that's not really an issue for retirement income. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:16:30 -0800 (PST), "Robert M. Gary"
wrote: Interesting that Southwest also doesn't have a defined benefit retirement plan, and instead has a 401K like the rest of us. I'm sure that helps. Wasn't a good part of it having real cheap fuel by long term options which have also now expired? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I have a friend that has been doing this for many years. It probably helps that he has over 20,000 hours and has held his 135 certificate, accident free, for 20 years. I don't think the FAA is the biggest thing to overcome, there are some canned 135 ops manuals you can get. What may ultimately kill my friend's 135 operation is the drug requirements. He currently pays to have his main IA receive regular, FAA approved, drug screening. However, every other mechanic that works on the plane needs the same, including the avionics shop. I was down at the avionics shop and they said they are considering dropping their drug testing program for their 135 customers (only my friend now). Their concern is that if they are missing one poster on their employee posting board the FAA can fine them $35,000. They said that would put them out of business and its just not worth it for a couple 135 customers. -Robert, CFII All repair stations have to have a drug testing 'policy' in place to keep the station certified. Isn't the avionics shop a repair station? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 5:33*pm, "Blueskies" wrote:
All repair stations have to have a drug testing 'policy' in place to keep the station certified. Isn't the avionics shop a repair station? They said the testing (or at least the posters) were specific to the 135. -Robert |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ... On Feb 20, 5:33 pm, "Blueskies" wrote: All repair stations have to have a drug testing 'policy' in place to keep the station certified. Isn't the avionics shop a repair station? They said the testing (or at least the posters) were specific to the 135. -Robert I cannot find anything under part 145 about required drug testing. I'll bet you are right it is limited to stations that support 135/121 air carriers... |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 5:41*pm, Larry Dighera wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:46:03 -0800 (PST), "Robert M. Gary" wrote in : On Feb 20, 1:40*pm, Larry Dighera wrote: On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:37:49 -0800 (PST), Dan wrote in : Currently, when thinking about what I'd like to do when I "retire" I think I'd like to fly a lot. *However, it is expensive so it would be better to get paid to do it rather than spend big money on a hobby. If your motivation is revenue generation, consider real estate investment. *If you start buying foreclosures, and put enough equity in them so that the rental income makes the mortgage payment, you will be able to leverage your equity investment's appreciation by something like 80%. * What about your equity? Doesn't it deserve a return too? Huh? *That's the whole point. * Let's use $100,000 as the home price. *If the real estate appreciates at 10% annually, with a 20% down payment (the equity), you are able to realize a gain of, not 10% of $20,000 ($2,000), but 10% of $100,000 ($10,000) annually. You could put it in eTrade savings account and get 4% FDIC insured so why put it into real-estate hoping to just get your payment out of it?? For the appreciation in property value. *The rent payment just covers your costs (approximately) over the life of the investment. * Real estate goes up and down, but over the long run, .... *With the rate of population growth worldwide, I don't see how it can miss. *The only true downside is the lack of liquidity, but that's not really an issue for retirement income. The long term average for real estate appreciation is 5%, after accounting for inflation. --Dan |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 5:16*pm, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:
On Feb 20, 4:02*pm, Dan wrote: On Feb 20, 4:40*pm, Marty Shapiro wrote: Dan wrote in news:8e803d10-c44e-44da-bf45- : On Feb 20, 5:26*am, Denny wrote: Three years ago my mechanic/fbo put a ton of money into an Aztec, hired a pilot, hired a firm to create the books, had the FAA in on 3 different trips inspecting the plane, the office, the books, taking the pilot for a check ride, yadda, yadda... Then once approved to operate 135 he began bidding for jobs... He found that the competition was playing hardball, even running a Learjet on jobs for less than he was willing to do with the Aztec, they often bid jobs for barely more than their fuel costs apparently losing money to establish rapport with the shipper... The competitors took jobs where they would be deadheading back after the run and still underbid him, plus they beat him to the punch by taking the run a half day sooner because he was still trying to find cargo for both directions... *In the end he went belly up... If you are going to succeed you will do most of the flying yourself, you will need to be an A&P to hold your maintenance costs down, you will be ready to live out of the airplane yes, sleep in it for a week at a time as you hopscotch across the country taking cargo from a to b, then deadheading to c for a run to d, and so on, you will likely have to get by with only insurance for for PL & PD and take the chance you won't destroy the plane which means your family will have to front the money for the plane instead of a bank loan ... Other than that, it should be a piece of cake! denny Wow! That sounds like quite a nightmare. *Apparently aviation and successful entrepreneurialism do NOT go hand in hand. You paint a picture so bleak (and it might well be true) that it makes me wonder why anyone goes into aviation. I have a good paying job now, but I'd like to do something more fun when I get to a point in my life I can work and not be concerned with making top dollar (i.e. 10-20 years out). *I'm trying to plan out how I might prepare for doing something in aviation. Currently, when thinking about what I'd like to do when I "retire" I think I'd like to fly a lot. *However, it is expensive so it would be better to get paid to do it rather than spend big money on a hobby. I'm not sure the CFI route is for me. *I prefer cross country flights with a definate destination. *--Dan I read several years ago that the combined record of all airlines since day one of commercial aviation shows a net loss. *As they say the only way to become a millionaire in aviation is to start with a few billion. -- Marty Shapiro Silicon Rallye Inc. (remove SPAMNOT to email me)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Somehow Southwest and Netjets are doing pretty good though, so with good management it should be possible to make money. Not that I claim to have the magic bullet of course. Interesting that Southwest also doesn't have a defined benefit retirement plan, and instead has a 401K like the rest of us. I'm sure that helps. -Robert- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Virtually no jobs in the corporate world these days have a pension. I don't feel sorry for the Southwest pilots. --Dan |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:40:15 -0800 (PST), Dan wrote in
: The long term average for real estate appreciation is 5%, after accounting for inflation. To do as well in the stock market it would have to yield 25% appreciation, unless you're buying on margin..... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
An-2 starting | Jaroslaw Manek | Aviation Photos | 0 | May 27th 07 08:30 PM |
Starting at the right age | Photoplasm | Aviation Photos | 4 | April 24th 07 08:37 PM |
Just starting out... | Jase Vanover | Piloting | 20 | April 24th 05 08:23 PM |
Starting FS9 | Hector Relva | Simulators | 1 | September 22nd 03 02:21 PM |
Boeing 307 Starting Up! | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 5 | August 8th 03 06:53 PM |