A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Turbo prop question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 25th 08, 09:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,969
Default Turbo prop question

"Robert M. Gary" wrote in
:

On Apr 25, 3:26*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Frank Olson wrote
innews:0ShQ

j.90501$rd2.26964@pd7urf3no:

He's not wrong but he's not
right if you know what I mean.


Yes, we all lived through the Clinton years, we know that it depends
on the definition of "it" and not wrong but not right, etc.



Em, ok, not quite the same thing...


You would think that if you could grasp that subtlety, though, you'd
have sussed out the more recent string of lies...


Bertie


Bertie
  #2  
Old April 25th 08, 10:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt W. Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 427
Default Turbo prop question


"Frank Olson" wrote in message
news:0ShQj.90501$rd2.26964@pd7urf3no...
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Chris W wrote in news:74gQj.67968$y05.19485
@newsfe22.lga:

I was channel surfing the other day and caught the tail end of some

show
about rich people and their planes. Anyway the pilot of this one

single
engine turbo prop said there was no mechanical connection between the
prop and engine. How can that be?


I didn't catch the name of the plane. but as I remember, there were 4
seats in the passenger area, and it was pretty roomy. The only other
distinctive thing I can remember is it had a fairly large cargo door
with a power assist to close it because it was so far over head when

it
was open.




It's a free turbine. Most modern turboprops use that system. There's a
seperate turbine that runs the prop geabox. He's technically incorrect
since that turbine is part of the engine... Bertie



Rich people. More money than brains.


Envious people - generally stupid.


  #3  
Old April 26th 08, 04:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Frank Olson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 90
Default Turbo prop question

Matt W. Barrow wrote:
"Frank Olson" wrote in message
news:0ShQj.90501$rd2.26964@pd7urf3no...
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Chris W wrote in news:74gQj.67968$y05.19485
@newsfe22.lga:

I was channel surfing the other day and caught the tail end of some
show
about rich people and their planes. Anyway the pilot of this one
single
engine turbo prop said there was no mechanical connection between the
prop and engine. How can that be?


I didn't catch the name of the plane. but as I remember, there were 4
seats in the passenger area, and it was pretty roomy. The only other
distinctive thing I can remember is it had a fairly large cargo door
with a power assist to close it because it was so far over head when
it
was open.



It's a free turbine. Most modern turboprops use that system. There's a
seperate turbine that runs the prop geabox. He's technically incorrect
since that turbine is part of the engine... Bertie


Rich people. More money than brains.


Envious people - generally stupid.




Touché! :-)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
turbo prop first officer needed pcj Piloting 0 October 27th 04 05:13 AM
turbo prop first officer needed pcj Piloting 2 October 27th 04 05:07 AM
Turbo prop AT-6/SNJ? frank may Military Aviation 11 September 5th 04 02:51 PM
Piston V.S Turbo Prop Vigo Owning 10 July 2nd 04 06:15 PM
A36 Bonanza turbo prop Jeff Owning 46 January 7th 04 02:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.