![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 1, 8:43*pm, 309 wrote:
I'm for no politics with our group. My experience, even in soaring, is that "politics" is not something you can "avoid." *Who's been in a club that remained perfectly peaceful for more than say, 10 minutes? There is good politics and there is bad politics...good politics is how compromise is achieved. *Everything else is "bad" politics, usually where there is a self-serving drive (on the left or the right...listed here alphabetically, with no "political persuasion")...and can usually be spotted when compromise is not possible. *My philosophy on politics has changed over the years. *I was an idealistic engineer who thought he could avoid politics altogether. *Avoiding politics doesn't get you out of politics...you just turn yourself into an "innocent bystander," a "pawn in the game," if you will. I believe pilots are generally somewhat conservative: *they look at high risk endeavors (like soaring) and weigh the risks, try to mitigate them, and accept risks that can be managed...but shy away from excessive risk. *Pilots who fail to shy away from excessive risk generally wind up as candidates for the Darwin Awards...but that might be off topic, as well. *I know (and have known) pilots of both "persuasions" ... there are some I will not fly with (and probably a few who won't fly with me!). I can identify with the person who started this thread: *Because of the "financial crisis" I can't afford to pay for as many tows in 2009 (or will chose not to "invest" in those tows, and instead stuff money in a mattress -- aka my children's college fund). *Some of us chose to buy 1-26's instead of those coveted ASH-26E's, thinking (conservatively?) that we could not afford the more (?) desirable "toy," and have chosen to live within our means. *Whether you are of a left or right political persuasion, there's little point in arguing that people buying things they really could not afford (including ponzi scheme investments) is at the root of the financial mess we're left with today. *Those that argue the true cause is greed are totally correct: *it is almost as "greedy" to buy a home you know you cannot afford as it is to try and sell somebody a home they cannot afford. Strike "home" and insert "glider" if you wish... *Teaching somebody how to mend a bad credit rating or how to enhance their ability to earn an income is a much better service than helping somebody buy a house they will only be able to afford in a "good economy." *I refinanced twice (contributing to the mortgage sellers each time) to get a low, long term fixed loan for the roof over my head and housing my glider. *Keeping the roof over my head is more important than investing in tows, or having a Beamer to tool around town in. My hope is that we'll have "good" politics in the next few years, and rather than trying to "minimize the pain," our "leaders" try to allow necessary pain, so those who need to will learn from this (I sure have), and avoid repeating this. *And hopefully those who have been responsible will not have to pay too much for the actions of those who have not been responsible. To the person that said "when I'm coring a 500 fpm thermal, I know I am THERE" I say amen, and hope more pilots get to have that pleasure. "Good" politics helps us advance our art, sport and science of aviation. *ANYbody who has dealt with the FAA knows that there are political forces that cannot be ignored -- some for good reasons, some for bad reasons. Thank you to all those who have contributed, even those that think there should be no contribution to this thread. -Pete (flame proof suit has been put on, so have at it -- I plan not to argue with anybody) In this group, I'd just as soon stick to the politics centered on sensible advocacy for our sport; things like airspace, FAA regs, and the like. When it comes to foreign policy, economics, and social issues, there are plenty of outlets for expressing our opinions (and often reinforcing our personal biases). Regarding the posted opinion that started this thread, which was obviously of the economic variety, I'm just not ready to bemoan the price of aerotows and self-launchers. Anyone lucky enough to worry about those things is very lucky, indeed. There are many folks all over the world just trying to keep their families safe, warm and fed. I wish you all good fortune in the coming year, soaring and otherwise...Happy New Year. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is the YouTube video legit. | Greg Hall | Piloting | 37 | June 14th 08 11:26 PM |
Another weird YouTube plane video | gatt[_2_] | Piloting | 50 | February 14th 08 05:09 PM |
Another weird YouTube plane video | Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe | Piloting | 1 | February 8th 08 04:57 AM |
Navy stops video on YouTube | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 5 | August 23rd 07 02:03 AM |
Another YouTube video | [email protected] | Soaring | 38 | August 20th 07 03:57 PM |