A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

F-35, not F-22, to Protect U.S. Airspace



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #2  
Old February 3rd 09, 12:47 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Peter Skelton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 93
Default F-35, not F-22, to Protect U.S. Airspace

On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:45:03 -0600, Ian B MacLure
wrote:

hcobb wrote in news:da77e6cd-ee43-4fcb-8644-
:

[snip]

Now if Europe fails to back President Neo against terrorist states and
so forces America to take action to take out the danger (that is even
more acute for Europe simply because they don't got no Atlantic moat
for the limited protection that offers in a global world), then the
blame for the hundreds, thousands or millions of lives to be lost does
not fall on America.


And of course the Eurabians including Il Dottore's country all
have enormous Mooselimb fifth columns resident therein and a
power elite that seems determined to hand them the knives they
will use to slit Eurabian throats.

Could I humbly sugggest that you look into muslim populations
before you spew your tripe? The US has a larger Muslim population
than any European country but Russia. On a per cant basis it is
near the European median.

That or use smileys.

Peter Skelton
  #3  
Old February 2nd 09, 09:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
hcobb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 64
Default F-35, not F-22, to Protect U.S. Airspace

On Feb 2, 6:45 am, 150flivver wrote:
Exactly how was the Air Force supposed to prevent 9/11? I guess the
Air Force wasn't prepared to prevent the banking crisis or global
warming either.


Which service is it that's supposed to at least intercept hostile
aircraft in American skies?

Perhaps this also should be handed over to the USMC?

-HJC
  #4  
Old February 3rd 09, 12:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
150flivver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 171
Default F-35, not F-22, to Protect U.S. Airspace

On Feb 2, 3:08*am, hcobb wrote:
On Feb 2, 6:45 am, 150flivver wrote:

Exactly how was the Air Force supposed to prevent 9/11? *I guess the
Air Force wasn't prepared to prevent the banking crisis or global
warming either.


Which service is it that's supposed to at least intercept hostile
aircraft in American skies?

Perhaps this also should be handed over to the USMC?

-HJC


9/11 was a criminal act conducted by foreign criminals. Calling it
war doesn't make it so. Law enforcement is something I don't want the
military involved in. The FBI and CIA dropped the ball on this one,
not the Air Force. Shooting down airliners filled with hostages/
citizens is something the Soviet Union would do, not what the USA does.
  #5  
Old February 3rd 09, 02:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Ian B MacLure
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 100
Default F-35, not F-22, to Protect U.S. Airspace

150flivver wrote in news:359a3711-b5ea-4741-
:

On Feb 2, 3:08*am, hcobb wrote:
On Feb 2, 6:45 am, 150flivver wrote:

Exactly how was the Air Force supposed to prevent 9/11? *I guess the
Air Force wasn't prepared to prevent the banking crisis or global
warming either.


Which service is it that's supposed to at least intercept hostile
aircraft in American skies?

Perhaps this also should be handed over to the USMC?

-HJC


9/11 was a criminal act conducted by foreign criminals. Calling it


It was an act of war by a non-state actor. We quite properly
took it at face value and opened hostilities on the actors
and their supporters.

war doesn't make it so. Law enforcement is something I don't want the
military involved in. The FBI and CIA dropped the ball on this one,
not the Air Force. Shooting down airliners filled with hostages/
citizens is something the Soviet Union would do, not what the USA does.


The FBI and CIA had been knecapped by Jamie Gorelick at Klintoon's
behest. It was more than your career was worth to ask inconvenient
questions or, god forbid, share information. Many of the necessary
dots were already plotted. They just could not legally be connected
and it took an enormous effort against determined Dhimmicrap
opposition to change that situation.

IBM

  #6  
Old February 3rd 09, 01:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Jack Linthicum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 301
Default F-35, not F-22, to Protect U.S. Airspace

On Feb 2, 9:51*pm, Ian B MacLure wrote:
150flivver wrote in news:359a3711-b5ea-4741-
:

On Feb 2, 3:08*am, hcobb wrote:
On Feb 2, 6:45 am, 150flivver wrote:


Exactly how was the Air Force supposed to prevent 9/11? *I guess the
Air Force wasn't prepared to prevent the banking crisis or global
warming either.


Which service is it that's supposed to at least intercept hostile
aircraft in American skies?


Perhaps this also should be handed over to the USMC?


-HJC


9/11 was a criminal act conducted by foreign criminals. *Calling it


* * * * It was an act of war by a non-state actor. We quite properly
* * * * took it at face value and opened hostilities on the actors
* * * * and their supporters.

war doesn't make it so. *Law enforcement is something I don't want the
military involved in. *The FBI and CIA dropped the ball on this one,
not the Air Force. *Shooting down airliners filled with hostages/
citizens is something the Soviet Union would do, not what the USA does.


* * * * The FBI and CIA had been knecapped by Jamie Gorelick at Klintoon's
* * * * behest. It was more than your career was worth to ask inconvenient
* * * * questions or, god forbid, share information. Many of the necessary
* * * * dots were already plotted. They just could not legally be connected
* * * * and it took an enormous effort against determined Dhimmicrap
* * * * opposition to change that situation.

* * * * IBM


IIRC Clinton left office in January 2001, the FBI and CIA continued
their feud that says "I won't tell you anything you can use", and FBI
telephone taps that should have been tied to that "Osama bin Ladin
wants to do harm to the US" line in the PDB. As near as I can tell
that division still exists, perhaps expanded by the NSA being able to
say "I know something you don't". We now have an extra level of DNI to
add to the various inter service and interagency versions of that same
attitude. I would bet that more useful intelligence gets stuffed into
burn bags than gets into the PDB.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
F-35, not F-22, to Protect U.S. Airspace T.L. Davis Naval Aviation 12 February 3rd 09 02:09 AM
Help Us Protect Wickenburg Municipal Airport Mike[_22_] Piloting 0 September 10th 08 05:39 AM
Wichita Airspace Question and overlapping airspace Owen[_4_] Piloting 1 February 14th 07 09:35 PM
Policy OKs First Strike to Protect U.S.(NOT US BUT ISRAEL!) [email protected] Naval Aviation 1 March 21st 05 06:44 AM
Two airspace classes for one airspace? (KOQU) John R Piloting 8 June 30th 04 04:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.