![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Talk is cheap, while skepticism is free...well, except perhaps for a
diminution of imagination. I remember when news of Greg Cole's Sparrow Hawk first appeared on RAS. There were the predictable skeptics: - he'll never deliver anything; - he'll never deliver at U.S. ultralight weight; - it won't have the predicted performance if he does deliver; - it'll cost too much in any event; - insurance woes will kill it; - it'll be too fragile; - it's not 15 meters; - etc... Never mind the man's publicly-known technical background and professional resume of the time. Since then he has not only delivered, but done so at a rate that helps sustain a technology-intensive business in what remains a low-volume market. I, for one, am impressed as all get-out, at many levels. Now - in the same understated manner in which he acknowledged the existence of Sparrow Hawk hardware/airframe development - Greg Cole has informed the U.S. soaring world of his second (as known to me, anyway) sailplane/hardware under development. And - as with the Sparrow Hawk - Greg Cole has not only imagined a ship 'outside the box* of conventional soaring thought' but begun seriously acting upon his imaginings. He has my deep respect and sincere wishes for continuing business success...and would have even were we not from the same country. He's not alone in so having that, BTW; I'm no less impressed with the work of Attie Jonkers and Danny Howell (as known largely to me via the same convention) and the tremendous belief and years of effort of Bob Kuykendall (as known to me mostly via RAS). Throughout its history and as well demonstrated still today, soaring has attracted some remarkable people! Personally, I'm less skeptical about the Duck Hawk than I am hopeful sufficient numbers of them will wind up in the hands of soaring pilots with sufficient imagination and talent and wherewithal to begin expanding 'everyone's' commonly accepted realm of soaring possibilities. Ditto Danny Howell's Lighthawk. While I doubt any of the men mentioned here dream and design and create mostly for reasons of receiving 'Attaboys!' I'm genuinely pleased to be in a position to give them mine. I can hardly wait until the first Duck Hawk airframe is completed, even though I'll almost certainly never be in a position to pilot it. Bob - anticipatorily - W. * 'Outside the box' - Am I the only one who remembers from the Albuquerque convention Greg Cole's intention (then, anyway) to stress the Duck Hawk for 'useful' dynamic soaring speeds and maneuvers (and concomitant stresses)...as in enabling it to be capable of dynamically soaring (say) the fringes of the jet stream? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kudos to Region 10 Fredericksburg Contest Team | Tim[_2_] | Soaring | 2 | August 14th 07 10:00 PM |
Kudos to SSA | Ray Lovinggood | Soaring | 1 | January 25th 06 03:49 PM |
Kudos on ssa enewsletter.. | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 7 | February 19th 05 03:38 PM |
cat and duck | Richard Bennett | Home Built | 17 | November 13th 04 03:21 AM |
Flightsim navigation...Kudos to Charles Wood | Dr. Anthony J. Lomenzo | Simulators | 2 | August 21st 03 12:05 PM |