![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim" wrote in message m... So you are saying if I loose power at high altitude in a fixed pitch prop aircraft, like a Skyhawk, I will have less drag if I stop the prop, as opposed to letting it windmill? Yes, but with a fixed pitch prop you may or may not be able to stop the prop by slowing down to a near stall. Once stopped, it may or may not stay stopped at best glide speed. It would depend on the pitch of your prop, the compression of your engine, your plane's best glide speed, the quality of the pilot's speed control, and the phase of the moon. Vaughn |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Tim" wrote: "Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message news ![]() In article , wrote: On May 5, 1:06 pm, Scott Skylane wrote: As an aside, the drag created by a windmilling propeller, i.e. one not feathered and attached to a dead engine, creates as much drag as a flat plate the same size as the area of the prop arc. Nope. The blades cannot be everywhere at once, and so the area affected is no larger than the blade area. Dan YES! In aeronautical engineering analysis, a windmilling prop is considered to be a flat disk, with drag numbers to match. Feathering the prop greatly reduces drag. So you are saying if I loose power at high altitude in a fixed pitch prop aircraft, like a Skyhawk, I will have less drag if I stop the prop, as opposed to letting it windmill? That is correct! -- Remove _'s from email address to talk to me. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Orval Fairbairn wrote:
wrote: Scott Skylane wrote: As an aside, the drag created by a windmilling propeller, i.e. one not feathered and attached to a dead engine, creates as much drag as a flat plate the same size as the area of the prop arc. Nope. The blades cannot be everywhere at once, and so the area affected is no larger than the blade area. YES! In aeronautical engineering analysis, a windmilling prop is considered to be a flat disk, with drag numbers to match. Feathering the prop greatly reduces drag. Three answers not entirely correct, none entirely wrong - how can this be? Because as shown by simple empirical measurements, "it depends" as indicated in this thesis: http://www.goshen.edu/physics/PropellerDrag/thesis.htm (Scroll down to review figures 11 through 14 if you are in a hurry. Figure 13 label provides a summary relevant to this thread.) As the author of that thesis noted: "The available publications and information in the area of propeller drag are almost non-existent, not because of any difficulties of the research sophistication, but because of the simplicity of it. To investigate propeller drag one does not need electronics and a large grant, one only needs a wind tunnel and a spring for a quick measurement. Therefore, most of the research in this field was done before articles were indexed as they are now. It was not until I found some journals from the 1930's that I could actually piece together trails of research." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Logajan wrote:
Orval Fairbairn wrote: wrote: Scott Skylane wrote: As an aside, the drag created by a windmilling propeller, i.e. one not feathered and attached to a dead engine, creates as much drag as a flat plate the same size as the area of the prop arc. Nope. The blades cannot be everywhere at once, and so the area affected is no larger than the blade area. YES! In aeronautical engineering analysis, a windmilling prop is considered to be a flat disk, with drag numbers to match. Feathering the prop greatly reduces drag. Three answers not entirely correct, none entirely wrong - how can this be? Because as shown by simple empirical measurements, "it depends" as indicated in this thesis: http://www.goshen.edu/physics/PropellerDrag/thesis.htm (Scroll down to review figures 11 through 14 if you are in a hurry. Figure 13 label provides a summary relevant to this thread.) As the author of that thesis noted: "The available publications and information in the area of propeller drag are almost non-existent, not because of any difficulties of the research sophistication, but because of the simplicity of it. To investigate propeller drag one does not need electronics and a large grant, one only needs a wind tunnel and a spring for a quick measurement. Therefore, most of the research in this field was done before articles were indexed as they are now. It was not until I found some journals from the 1930's that I could actually piece together trails of research." True that propeller research went away around WWII, but wind turbine research is currently a hot topic and that's what the propeller becomes when the engine stops. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Engine-out procedures and eccentric forces on engine pylons | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 18 | May 26th 07 01:03 AM |
Saturn V F-1 Engine Testing at F-1 Engine Test Stand 6866986.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 1 | April 11th 07 04:48 PM |
F-1 Engine for the Saturn V S-IC (first) stage depicts the complexity of the engine 6413912.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 9th 07 01:38 PM |
Tilt-rotor folding/feathering props. | Charles Gray | Military Aviation | 2 | June 19th 04 03:18 AM |
1710 allison v-12 engine WWII p 38 engine | Holger Stephan | Home Built | 9 | August 21st 03 08:53 AM |