![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
a wrote:
On Aug 12, 1:17 pm, Ross wrote: wrote: Subject says it all. Why do the landings for night currency have to be made to a full stop? Thanks Chris I read the replies and I hope this is a better answer. One poster said it correctly, the FARs say you have to. But, night flying is so different than day. The perspectives of the runway environment are different and whether you have a dark night or a full moon night. Safety would be an answer, but I think it is more the difference. Night flying on a moonless night is akin to IFR, almost, especially in a sparsely populated area. Just another bit of information. Before I had to sell my plane, our local airport wanted to get night approach lights. I took the airport sponsor and another pilot and went to a couple of airports that had VASI lights. I made much better landings at night following the VASI than I did at my home airport without them. I really found it amazing. I guess ThenI tended to be high on approach at night. -- Regards, Ross C-172F 180HP Sold ![]() KSWI If you want to really test your night time skills, find an isolated uncontrolled airport with minimal lighting -- be sure it has a 4000 foot or more runway. Then, do your landings planning touchdown a thousand feet from the approach end. The only way I can do it consistently is to put the Mooney in landing configuration, set the manifold pressure to where I want it, and fly the approach airspeed. I make throttle adjustments until my target flare point stays fixed in my sight picture when I'm 500 feet above the ground. I would much rather fly an ILS to minimums with a crosswind component near max allowable than fly into small airports with basic lighting at night. At least on an ILS when I look up and see the airport environment I know where things are supposed to be. Landing between the RR lights, or just setting up right, means among other things factoring in the width of the runway when imagining the sight picture to look for. I prove all too often that that 'Right Stuff" is really hard to find in my flight bag. ....then there are the country fields with pilot-activated lighting.... Brian W |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ohh... ok.. they work in the day light too..
I do land on runways at night with out "night approach lights" BT "Ross" wrote in message ... BT wrote: what are "night approach lights"? do not recall hearing that term before BT "Ross" wrote in message ... snip -- Regards, Ross C-172F 180HP Sold ![]() KSWI It was my lame term for VASI, etc type of approach landing light systems. -- Regards, Ross C-172F 180HP Sold ![]() KSWI |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
a wrote:
On Aug 11, 6:39 pm, wrote: Subject says it all. Why do the landings for night currency have to be made to a full stop? Thanks Chris Look at the regs for day time currency. . The easy answer is, if you bounce enough you could otherwise get 2 touch and go a littles, then a full stop, on a 5000 foot runway. So if it's good enough for day... Why would you want to skimp on proving to yourself you were still sharp enough? If you did three and weren't happy with them, even if to a full stop, would you stop because you could put a check mark next to current, or would you go back for some more to prove to yourself, not anyone else, you were good enough? I'd not want to fly with someone else as a PIC if he or she told me she had been inactive, then did 3 touch and goes. Would you? That's nice but doesn't address the original question, which was about the regulations, not what you feel is good enough. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 13, 9:35*pm, Jessica wrote:
wrote: Subject says it all. *Why do the landings for night currency have to be made to a full stop? IIRC, the reasoning is due to the lack of overall perspective of the airport environment at night compared to day. *Everything that is not lit disappears, so it is beneficial to have additional experience in that environment. *Perhaps the FAA expected pilots to practice taxing after each landing, although they did not require this. I've heard of students who received their primary training at night, and while they made great night landings had a lot of trouble at first during the day, so your mileage may vary. The simplest way to get your landings to a full stop is merely due stop and goes on a runway with suitable length (with tower's permission as applicable). Taildraggers need landings to a full stop during the day to maintain currency. If you are flying a more complex aircraft, you really want to get off the runway, stop and grab the checklist to make sure you are properly configured for the takeoff. If you forget something, say, leave the flaps down, or the trim where it was, etc, you could find yourself in a lot more trouble on a stop and go or touch and go than if the sun was shining. Anyway, it's what I always do. Saving a couple of minutes just isn't worth it. K l e i n |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you are flying a more complex aircraft, you really want to get off
the runway, stop and grab the checklist to make sure you are properly configured for the takeoff. If you forget something, say, leave the flaps down, or the trim where it was, etc, you could find yourself in a lot more trouble on a stop and go or touch and go than if the sun was shining. Anyway, it's what I always do. Saving a couple of minutes just isn't worth it. In my mind, the real question is why a 'bounce and go' is allowed for daytime currency in a nosedragger... -- Geoff The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 16, 9:17*am, "Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea Hawk @See My
Sig.com wrote: If you are flying a more complex aircraft, you really want to get off the runway, stop and grab the checklist to make sure you are properly configured for the takeoff. *If you forget something, say, leave the flaps down, or the trim where it was, etc, you could find yourself in a lot more trouble on a stop and go or touch and go than if the sun was shining. *Anyway, it's what I always do. *Saving a couple of minutes *just isn't worth it. In my mind, the real question is why a 'bounce and go' is allowed for daytime currency in a nosedragger... - Geoff The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate. I may be wrong about this, but I think daytime recent experience requires full stop landings too. A brief google search didn't answer another question -- that is, what does the FAA consider a 'take off'. If it just meant getting the wheels off the ground, I could do a take off from a dead stop off and a landing to a full stop without having to fly a circuit. I'd have to taxi a circuit though for the next cycle. That's a technical/legal question of course, the idea of doing 3 t-o and landings is to demonstrate you still know how to do tham. That should be the minimum requirement any of us have. If we have not flown in 90 days, boys and girls, there's rust on them there reflexes. Go do some airwork, maybe with a safety pilot. Find a crosswind and land into it. Do slow flight for a while, hang that damned thing on its prop. Do a steep 360 and stay within 50 feet of altitude. Do enough of that then ask yourself if you were riding in someone else's airplane and knew that was the extent of his recent experience, would you let him fly you somewhere? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe The Sea Hawk @see my sig.com wrote:
If you are flying a more complex aircraft, you really want to get off the runway, stop and grab the checklist to make sure you are properly configured for the takeoff. If you forget something, say, leave the flaps down, or the trim where it was, etc, you could find yourself in a lot more trouble on a stop and go or touch and go than if the sun was shining. Anyway, it's what I always do. Saving a couple of minutes just isn't worth it. In my mind, the real question is why a 'bounce and go' is allowed for daytime currency in a nosedragger... They are not. Read 61.57 a.1.ii -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert Moore wrote:
wrote In my mind, the real question is why a 'bounce and go' is allowed for daytime currency in a nosedragger... They are not. Read 61.57 a.1.ii Perhaps you did not accurately read the post to which you responded? Bob Moore Yep, all I saw was "dragger"... -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why must night landings be full-stop? | Ron Garret | Piloting | 25 | March 17th 08 12:34 PM |
Night currency question | john | Piloting | 55 | December 19th 07 07:00 AM |
Radio protocol regarding full stops on full stop only nights | Ben Hallert | Piloting | 33 | February 9th 05 07:52 PM |
regaining night currency but not alone | Teacherjh | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | May 28th 04 02:08 PM |
Night Currency | Doug Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | October 17th 03 10:53 PM |